To explication of the issue of contemporaneity: general philosophical and cultural historical approaches | Tomsk State University Journal of Cultural Studies and Art History. 2019. № 33. DOI: 10.17223/22220836/33/1

To explication of the issue of contemporaneity: general philosophical and cultural historical approaches

The term “contemporaneity” has a complicated diverse structure and axiological aspect of content, due to that, attempts to define it face difficulty. Mostly, the issue of contemporaneity is determined by the modernity of the instruments used to construct and reflect the coordinates of the modern world. The difficulty is also associated with the necessity to combine some concept of actual physical time, which is not simply individual, with its axiological content, significant for the majority. It causes the problem of the language of definition, and art, from our point of view, is solution. The object of the article is the explication of the issue of contemporaneity including the aspect of its construction, based on the comparative analysis of classic and modern philosophical concepts. The authors admit the possibility to find a synthetic definition of the term “contemporaneity” and the explication of the issue of contemporaneity in philosophy by means of two approaches, defined as general philosophical (contemporaneity is considered a historical situation, the issue is identified through its axiological content) and historical cultural (the idea of contemporaneity is also defined through art practice). The authors propose that art with its autonomy makes it possible to use the unique complete language of description/ construction of contemporaneity as time and existential subjectivity defined in its actual uncertainty. This proposition is criticized by the authors as well. To reach the goal, the authors consider basic content of the concepts within general philosophical approach (Hegel, Nietsche, Heidegger, Spengler and others), and historical cultural approach (Baudelaire, Habermas, Groys and others), by means of approving the use of art practice, firstly, by forming the idea of contemporaneity in art sphere, and, secondly, by the functional aspect of art sphere considered through the concept of autonomy of art. The authors' analysis is based on the philosophy of Boris Groys. One of the main issues is implied in the way he develops the logic of contemporaneity as link between art creating it and cultural historical process. The division between approaches was caused not only by the idea of distinguishing concepts considering contemporaneity from general ontological perspective and through art practice, but also by the necessity to identify the main aspects forming the idea of contemporaneity.

Download file
Counter downloads: 281

Keywords

современность, современное искусство, время в искусстве, Борис Гройс, Contemporaneity, contemporary art, time in art, Boris Groys

Authors

NameOrganizationE-mail
Baboshko Elena Yu.Tomsk State Universityelena.baboshko@gmail.com
Galkin Dmitriy V.Tomsk State Universitygalkindv@me.com
Всего: 2

References

Калинеску М. Идея современности [Электронный ресурс] // Художественный журнал. 2016. № 98. URL: http://moscowartmagazine.com/issue/31/article/541 (дата обращения: 18.10.2018).
Гройс Б. Политика поэтики. М. : Ад Маргинем Пресс, 2012. 401 с.
Ницше Ф. Стихотворения. Философская проза. СПб. : Худ. лит., 1993. 670 c.
Гройс Б. Утопия и обмен. М. : Знак, 1993. 374 с.
Гройс Б. Логика равноправия [Электронный ресурс] // Художественный журнал. 2005. № 58/59. URL: http://moscowartmagazine.com/issue/30/article/508 (дата обращения: 16.11.2018).
Гройс Б. Топология современного искусства [Электронный ресурс] // Художественный журнал. 2006. № 61/62. URL: http://moscowartmagazine.com/issue/36/article/696 (дата обращения: 5.10.2018).
Гайденко П.П. Прорыв к трансцендентному : Новая онтология ХХ века. М. : Республика, 1997. 495 с.
Ницше Ф. Полное собрание сочинений : в 13 т. Т. 12 : Черновики и наброски 18851887 гг. / пер. с нем. В.М. Бакусева; науч. ред. С.В. Казачков. М. : Культурная революция, 2005. 560 с.
Гегель Г.В. Феноменология духа / пер. с нем. Г.Г. Шпета; под ред. М.Ф. Быковой. М. : Наука, 2000. 495 с.
Этапы дискуссий о модерне в философии. Этапы дискуссий о модерне в философии // История философии: Запад - Россия - Восток (кн. 4 : Философия ХХ в.) / под ред. Н.В. Мотро-шиловой и А.М. Руткевича. М. : Греко-латинский кабинет Ю.А. Шичалина, 1999. 448 с.
Фурс В.Н. Философия незавершенного модерна Юргена Хабермаса. Минск : Эконом-пресс, 2000. 224 с.
Хабермас Ю. Модерн - незавершенный проект // Политические работы. М., 2005. С. 16-19, 22-28.
Радикальная педагогика: уроки В. Беньямина : материалы круглого стола. Ч. 1 [Электронный ресурс] // Моск. книж. журнал. 2012. URL: http://morebo.ru/tema/segodnja/item/ 1343244686153 (дата обращения: 17.11.2018).
Джеймисон Ф. Постмодернизм и общество потребления [Электронный ресурс] // Логос : интернет-журнал. URL: http://www.ruthenia.ru/logos/number/2000_4/10.htm (дата обращения: 25.11.2018).
Андерсон П. Истоки постмодерна. М. : Изд. дом «Территория будущего», 2011. 168 с.
 To explication of the issue of contemporaneity: general philosophical and cultural historical approaches | Tomsk State University Journal of Cultural Studies and Art History. 2019. № 33. DOI:  10.17223/22220836/33/1

To explication of the issue of contemporaneity: general philosophical and cultural historical approaches | Tomsk State University Journal of Cultural Studies and Art History. 2019. № 33. DOI: 10.17223/22220836/33/1

Download full-text version
Counter downloads: 654