Medieval tradition of courtly love and its influence upon transforming matrimonial relations in European societies
Introduction. The article presents a study on the system of gender social roles in modern neolib-eral societies transformation, in particular, European and Russian society; and the genetic relationship of this change with the cultural tradition of courtly love. The purpose of the work is to analyse the symbolic tradition of worshipping Beautiful Lady within the courtly love which originated in Western European chivalric culture in the middle ages, and to shew how it is connected with the modern processes of radical transformation of gender social roles and gender communication system in European and Russian society. Research methods. The research is based on the following methods: a) semiotic methods of analysing cultural signs by R. Barthes and Ch. S. Peirce; b) psychoanalytic techniques of studying guilt complex, erotic worshipping and masochist syndrome by H. Marcuse and L. von Sacher-Masoch; c) cultural procedure of investigating love narrative in European culture by D. de Rougemont. The materials include cultural symbols representing the traditions of courtly love typical for Western Europe in the middle ages; literature prosaic texts of Romanticism and Realism, closely related to such representation. Results. The results consist in the revealing of the cultural and psychological succession between: a) prosaic, poetic and symbolic consequences of the courtly tradition of worshipping Beautiful Lady and b) diminishing of the significance of social institution of traditional family in modern Western and Russian society. The article examines the psychological, social and semiotic mechanisms of such continuity. It reveals the direct relationship between the masochistic psychological complex; Marcuse's concept of civilization repression; symbolic courtly male reverence for women codified in the signs of Eternal Femininity and Beautiful Lady in the middle ages; and the transgression of modern gender relations. It is emphasised that in nowadays' global society, there is a proliferation of simulative exchange of free intimacy in which the simulation of love begins to be interpreted as true intimacy. Conclusions. It is concluded that the "post-family" intimacy in the modern neoliberal society is symbolically based on a conscious deviance as well as transgression of the gender-power relations system. The basic principles of such transgression were formulated within the Western European courtly tradition of worshipping Beautiful Lady. The author notes that in the middle ages, the chivalrous revision of traditional gender-power relations in the culture of troubadours and minstrels, was limited to the scope of the symbolic and it was a cultural artifact. In the modern society, this tradition was able to change the classical social institutions of family and marriage; and because of this fact, this tradition acquired the power of social action.
Keywords
гендерные роли в обществе,
институт семьи,
институт брака,
культурная традиция,
куртуазная любовь,
поклонение Прекрасной Даме,
мазохизм,
social gender roles,
social institute of marriage,
social institute of family,
cultural tradition,
courtly love,
worshipping Beautiful Lady,
masochismAuthors
Sharov Konstantin S. | Moscow State University n.a. M.V. Lomonosov | const.sharov@mail.ru |
Всего: 1
References
Бердяев Н.А. Метафизика пола и любви // Русский эрос, или Философия любви в России / сост. В.П. Шестаков. М., 1991. C. 232-265.
Соловьев В.С. Смысл любви // Русский эрос, или Философия любви в России / сост. В.П. Шестаков. М., 1991. C. 19-76.
Розанов В.В. Люди лунного света. М., 1990. 298 с.
Schultz J.A. Courtly Love, the Love of Courtliness, and the History of Sexuality. Chicago, 2006. 224 p.
Pandey N.B. Caput mundi: Female Hair as Symbolic Vehicle of Domination in Ovidian Love Elegy // The Classical Journal. 2018. Vol. 113, № 4. P. 454-488. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/ 10.5184/classicalj.113.4.0454
Shamma T. Women and Slaves: Gender Politics in the Arabian Nights // Marvels & Tales. 2017. Vol. 31, No. 2. P. 239-260. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.13110/marvelstales.31.2.0239.
Lupack A. The Oxford Guide to Arthurian Literature and Legend. Oxford, 2005. 512 p.
Moore J. C. Courtly Love: A Problem of Terminology // Journal of the History of Ideas. 1979. Vol. 40, № 4. P. 621-632.
Rougemont D. de. L'amour et l'Occident. Paris, 2001. 448 p.
Bogin M. The Women Troubadours. New York, 1980. 192 р.
Чернышевский Н.Г. Что делать? М., 2011. 448 c.
Harris K.M., McDade Th. W. The Biosocial Approach to Human Development, Behavior, and Health Across the Life Course // The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences. 2018. Vol. 4, № 4. P. 2-26. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7758/rsf.2018A4.01
Дюби Ж. Куртуазная любовь и перемены в положении женщин во Франции XII в. / пер. с фр. Е.Ю. Симакова // Одиссей. Человек в истории. М., 1990. С. 90-96.
Newman F. The Meaning of Courtly Love. Albany; New York, 1968. 102 p.
Бодрийяр Ж. Символический обмен и смерть. М., 2000. 387 с.
Ross J. The search for certainty: A pragmatist critique of society's focus on Biological Childbearing // The Pluralist. 2018. Vol. 13, № 2. P. 96-108. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/ 10.5406/pluralist. 13.2.0096
D'Albis H., Greulich A., Ponthiere G. Education, labour, and the demographic consequences of birth postponement in Europe // Demographic Research. 2017. Vol. 36, № 1. P. 691-728. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2017.36.23
Маркузе Г. Эрос и цивилизация. М., 2003. 320 с.
Бауман З. Индивидуализированное общество. М., 2002. 390 с.
Stockdill B.C. Love in the Time of ACT UP: Reflections on AIDS Activism, Queer Family, and Desire // QED: A Journal in GLBTQ Worldmaking. 2018. Vol. 5, № 1. P. 48-83. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.14321/qed.5.1.0048
Волкогонова О.Д. Интимность в ускользающем мире // Космополис. 2005. № 1 (11). С.154-160.
Захер-Мазох Л. фон. Венера в мехах. СПб., 2012. 224 c.
Kuschel K. The Work-family Field: Gaps and Missing Links as Opportunities for Future Research // Innovar: Revista de ciencias administrativas y sociales. 2017. Vol. 27, № 66. P. 57-74. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15446/innovar.v27n66.66711
Duits E.J. L'Autre desir: Du sadomasochisme a l'amour courtois. Paris, 2000. 135 p.
Стризое А.Л., Храпова В.А. Вербальное и визуальное в культуре: иерархия или дополнительность? // Вопросы философии. 2018. № 6. URL: http://vphil.ru/index.php?option=com_con-tent&task=view&id=2001&Itemid=52.
Делез Ж. Представление Захер-Мазоха // Л. фон Захер-Мазох. Венера в мехах. М., 1992. С. 240-256.
Бронте Ш. Шерли. М., 2010. 608 с.
Hutton R. Witches and Cunning Folk in British Literature 1800-1940 // Preternature: Critical and Historical Studies on the Preternatural. 2018. Vol. 7, № 1. P. 27-49. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/ 10.5325/preternature.7.1.0027
Шоу Б. Пигмалион // Избранные пьесы. М., 1999. С. 421-512.
Moeser C. Sex Wars and the Contemporary French Moral Panic: The Productivity and Pitfalls of Feminist Conflicts // Meridians. 2018. Vol. 16, № 1. P. 79-111. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/ 10.2979/meridians.16.1.09
Норвуд Р. Надо ли быть рабой любви? М., 1994. 448 с.
Гидденс Э. Трансформация интимности: сексуальность, любовь и эротизм в современных обществах. М., 2004. 208 с.
Захер-Мазох Л. фон. Демонические женщины. СПб., 2008. 320 с.
Аусландер Л. Женские + феминистские + лесбийские + гей + квир исследования = тендерные исследования // Введение в гендерные исследования. Ч. 2 / под ред. С. Жеребкина. Харьков, 2001. С. 63-93.
Grey C., Lady. Politics of visibilities in the modern European world // The Beacon. 2018. V. 1. 010520001. P. 1-20.
Jakobson R. Verbal Art, Verbal Sign, Verbal Time / ed. by K. Pomorska and S. Rudy. Minneapolis, MN, 1985. 224 p.
Kasl Ch. Women, Sex and Addiction: A Search for Love and Power. London, 1990. 416 p.
Oxfeldt E., Nestingen A., Simonsen P. The happiest people on Earth? Scandinavian narratives of guilt and discontent // Scandinavian Studies. 2017. Vol. 89, № 4. P. 429-446.
Sharov K.S., Ng M., Lim H.Ch. Soziale rollen und status von Frauen im kaiserlichen China: apologie der konfuzianischen kultur und vergleich mit mittelalterlichen Europa // The Beacon. 2018. V. 1. 020310207. P. 1-16.