Student’s attitudes towards social robot (the Russian Federation and the Republic of Kazakhstan) | Humanitarian Informatics. 2015. № 9.

Student’s attitudes towards social robot (the Russian Federation and the Republic of Kazakhstan)

Download file

Counter downloads: 317

Keywords

the stereotype, human-robot interaction, social robotics, стереотип, взаимодействие робота и человека, социальная робототехника

Authors

Name	Organization	E-mail
Zilberman N.N.	National Research Tomsk State University
Amanzholova A.T.
Zhuravleva E.V.

Всего: 3

References

Tapus A., Mataric M.J. Towards socially assistive robotics // 日本ロボット学会誌. 2006. Vol. 24, № 5. Р. 576-578.

Trovato G. et al. Cross-cultural study on human-robot greeting interaction: acceptance and discomfort by Egyptians and Japanese // Paladyn, Journal of Behavioral Robotics. 2013. Vol. 4, № 2. Р. 83-93.

Syrdal D.S., Nomura T., Dautenhahn K. The Frankenstein Syndrome Questionnaire-Results from a Quantitative Cross-Cultural Survey // Social Robotics. 2013. Р. 270-279.

Nakada M. Robots and Privacy in Japanese, Thai and Chinese Cultures. Discussions on Robots and Privacy as Topics of Intercultural Information Ethics in ‘Far East’ // Proceedings Cultural Attitudes Towards Technology and Communication, Murdoch University, Australia. 2012. Р. 478-492.

Katz J.E., Halpern D. Attitudes towards robots suitability for various jobs as affected robot appearance // Behaviour & Information Technology. 2014. Vol. 33, № 9. Р. 941-953.

Louis Columbus Big Data Analytics, Mobile Technologies And Robotics Defining The Future Of Digital Factories [Электронный ресурс] // Forbes: Information for the World’s Business Leaders Forbes.com. Электрон. дан. 2015. URL: http://www.forbes. com/sites/louiscolumbus/2015/02/15/big-data-analytics-mobile-technologies-and-robotics-defi-ning-the-future-of-digital-factories/ (дата обращения: 12.03.2015).

Kanda T., Shimada M., Koizumi S. Children learning with a social robot //Proceedings of the seventh annual ACM/IEEE international conference on Human-Robot Interaction. ACM, 2012. Р. 351-358.

Haring K.S. et al. Perception of an Android Robot in Japan and Australia: A Cross-Cultural Comparison // Social Robotics. Springer International Publishing, 2014. Р. 166-175.

Hudlicka E. et al. Social interaction with robots and agents: Where do we stand, Where do we go? // Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction and Workshops, 2009. ACII 2009. 3rd International Conference on. 2009. Р. 1-6.

Furuta Y. Grad. Sch. of Comput. & Cognitive Sci., Chukyo Univ., Toyota, Japan Kanoh, M. ; Shimizu, T.; Shimizu, M. ;Nakamura, T. Subjective evaluation of use of Babyloid for doll therapy Fuzzy Systems (FUZZ-IEEE) // 2012 IEEE International Conference on 10-15 June 2012. 2012. Р. 1-4.

Breazeal C. Social interactions in HRI: the robot view // Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C: Applications and Reviews, IEEE Transactions on. 2004. Vol. 34, № 2. P. 181-186.

Duffy B. R. et al. What is a Social Robot? [Электронный ресурс]. Электрон. дан. 1999. URL: http://researchrepository.ucd.ie/bitstream/handle/10197/4412/P138. Duffy,Rooney, O'Hare,O'Donoghue-99.pdf?sequence=1 (дата обращения: 12.03.2015).

Bartneck C. et al. Cultural differences in attitudes towards robots // Proc. Symposium on Robot Companions (SSAISB 2005 Convention). 2005. Р. 1-4.

Bollini M. et al. Interpreting and executing recipes with a cooking robot //Experimental Robotics. Springer International Publishing, 2013. Р. 481-495.

Bae J.H. Trends, Practices, and Technology Issues in Early Childhood Education in Korea [Электронный ресурс] //Annual research Symposium 2012, University of Colombo. Электрон. дан. 2012. URL: http://archive.cmb.ac.lk/research/bitstream/ 70130/2994/1/Trends. pdf (дата обращения: 12.03.2015).

Зильберман Н.Н. Функциональная классификация социальных роботов // Гуманитарная информатика: сб. ст. / под ред. Г.В. Можаевой, Н.Н. Зильберман. 2014. Вып. 8 (специальный выпуск). С. 17-29.