QUALITY MANAGEMENT AS A CONDITION FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF E-LEARNING IN A MODERN UNIVERSITY | Humanitarian Informatics. 2016. № 11. DOI: 10.17223/23046082/11/8

QUALITY MANAGEMENT AS A CONDITION FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF E-LEARNING IN A MODERN UNIVERSITY

This paper presents the results of Tomsk State University experience in e-learning quality assurance basing on such indicators as the quality of learning materials, delivery systems, communication, and learning process support. Opportunities for managing these indicators are reviewed with the help of the LMS MOODLE with basic instruments and specially designed services as a part of university information learning environment and infrastructure. One of the effective ways of learning materials’ quality evaluation is their review by experts in a subject content and e-learning methods and technologies. Introduction of the e-learning courses that passed the review indicates productivity of professional activities of the university instructor. The key review stages of TSU on-campus e-learning courses are concentrated within a certain department. The course content review is performed by the specialists in the subject area of the MOOC. The expert should provide valid conclusions about the MOOC materials in general, constructive feedback, recommendations and suggestions on improving the MOOC. The most difficult stage of learning materials’ quality evaluation is work with social media and cloud services, as the materials there are marked by high mobility and variability. In this regard TSU staff uses by developing the course content in the LMS MOODLE those cloud based apps that expand the LMS functionality without its duplicating. The quality indicators of learning process support and related pedagogical communications are the most difficult to be measured. At TSU there is developed a service of users’ activity monitoring in LMS MOODLE to work with these indicators. The service is available as an auxiliary application in the LMS MOODLE to the staff of dean's offices and specialists responsible for e-learning in each university department. For quality evaluation of MOOC learning process support by course authors or their assistants a TSU MOOC curator on the Coursera platform monitors the admin board and analyses learners’ and instructors’ activity at course forums day-to-day. For identification of e-learning evaluation criteria from the users’ position there was held a pedagogical experiment with 23 TSU Master's degree students. The students were offered to state the e-learning evaluation criteria. The criteria were combined in five categories: quality of teaching materials, learning process management, individualization of learning, pedagogical communication, test and assessment system.

Download file
Counter downloads: 244

Keywords

электронное обучение, LMS MOODLE, МООК, мониторинг активности пользователей, e-learning, LMS MOODLE, MOOC, users activity monitoring

Authors

NameOrganizationE-mail
Olesya M. BabanskayaNational Research Tomsk State Universitybabanskaya@ido.tsu.ru
Galina V. MozhaevaNational Research Tomsk State University, Tomsk, Russiamozhaeva@ido.tsu.ru
Artem V. FeshchenkoNational Research Tomsk State University, Tomsk, Russiafav@ido.tsu.ru
Всего: 3

References

Moguš A. M. (2015). The use of quality management systems for e-learning, The Sixth International Conference on e-Learning (eLearning-2015). Retrieved from http://econference.metropolitan.ac.rs/files/pdf/2015/27-Ana-Mirkovic-Mogus-The-use-of-quality-management-systems-for-e-learning.pdf
Vasilkov, Y. & Gushina, L. (2014). Analysis of the effectiveness and efficiency of management systems based on system analysis methodology, International Journal for Quality Research, 8(3), 347-356
Putnik, G. & Ávila, P. (2015). Mechanisms to promote continuous improvement in quality management systems. International Journal for Quality Research, 9(1), 1-8.
Aniskina, N., Rashidi, A., & Winkel, R. (2014). To assess the quality by European standards. The construction of cross-border cooperation in the field of VET. Accreditation in Education, 70 (March), 70-71.
Conde, M.Á., García-Peñalvo, F.J., Rodríguez-Conde, M.J., Alier, M., Casany, M.J., & Piguillem, J. (2014). An evolving Learning Management System for new educational environments using 2.0 tools. Interactive Learning Environments, 22 (2), 188-204. doi: 10.1080/10494820.2012.745433
Casquero, O., Portillo, J., Ovelar, R., Romo, J., & Benito, M. (2013). PLEs in higher education: Exploring the transference of web 2.0 social affordances. International Journal of Virtual and Personal Learning Environments, Volume 4, Issue 4, 31-43. doi: 10.4018/ijvple.2013100103
Feshchenko A., Mozhaeva G., Kulikov I., & Zilberman N. (2015). Prospects for the Development of E-learning Technologies. Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Computer Supported Education, 208-212. doi: 10.5220/0005410102080212
Mozhaeva G., Feshchenko A., & Kulikov I. (2014). E-learning in the Evaluation of Students and Teachers: LMS or Social Networks? Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 152, 127 - 130.
 QUALITY MANAGEMENT AS A CONDITION FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF E-LEARNING IN A MODERN UNIVERSITY | Humanitarian Informatics. 2016. № 11. DOI: 10.17223/23046082/11/8

QUALITY MANAGEMENT AS A CONDITION FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF E-LEARNING IN A MODERN UNIVERSITY | Humanitarian Informatics. 2016. № 11. DOI: 10.17223/23046082/11/8