IS HELLO BARBIE AN INTERACTIVE DOLL OR SOCIAL ROBOT?
Dolls with elements of artificial intelligence appeared on the market of interactive toys, they are a completely new type of object for interaction with children. The most popular ones are Cayla (https://www.myfriendcayla.com/) and Hello Barbie (http://hellobarbiefaq.mattel.com) Of course, the automation of the doll took place a long time ago. Robot dolls are heirs of automatons, mechanical anthropomorphic automata, popular in the 16th - 19th centuries. The automaton simulated human movements in various situations, such dolls did not become the subject of a children's game, but entertained an adult audience. Later the automaton transformed into clockwork toys for children. New dolls differ from their predecessors, they have an artificial intelligence, which fundamentally changes the level of interactivity of this toy, the function and nature of the interaction. Specificity of the doll-toy is manipulation and controllability. Interacting with the doll, the child reflects his experience, his emotions and feelings, while at the same time, through a role-playing game he assimilates the categories of human relationships ", passes the stages of socialization. A doll is a child's double. A robotic doll loses its ability to unite with a child, on the contrary, it becomes a full-fledged independent Other, which requires a completely different interaction. Of course, the process of training, development of social skills occurs in this case, but it will be substantially limited. The robotic doll is able to interact only within the framework of one social role, its personality, preferences, behavioral models and speech strategies have already been prescribed by the developers in advance. Anthropomorphism is a common parameter for a traditional doll and a social robot, but the perception of human likeness is perceived by the child in different ways. Researchers note a number of possible negative consequences: emotional attachment, desocialization, the construction of other models of social relationships. A separate place is occupied with discussion of the threat of privacy and protection of privacy, robotic dolls connect to the network to receive updates, as well as save custom dialogs. Social robots with an anthropomorphic interface have been used for several years in communication with children not as a toy. For example, they are used as assistants in teaching a foreign language. Social robots of "doll design" are successfully used in the psychotherapeutic sphere - interaction with autistic children.
Keywords
кукла,
социальный робот,
взаимодействие человека и робота,
взаимодействие ребенка и робота,
кукла,
социальный робот,
взаимодействие человека и робота,
взаимодействие ребенка и робота,
doll,
social robot,
human-robot interaction,
child-robot interactionAuthors
| Zilberman Nadezhda N. | National Research Tomsk State University | zilberman@ido.tsu.ru |
Всего: 1
References
Clay R.J. Creeping Baby Doll. URL: https://research.archives.gov/id/595011 (дата обращения: 14.03.2017).
Autoperipatetikos / The National Museum of Toys and Miniatures educates. URL: http://toyandminiaturemuseum.org/collection/autoperipatetikos/ (дата обраще- ния: 14.03.2017).
Feaster P.A. Cultural History of the Edison Talking Doll Record. URL: https://www.nps.gov/edis/learn/photosmultimedia/a-cultural-history-of-the-edisontalking- doll-record.htm (дата обращения: 14.03.2017).
Официальный сайт компании Zapf Creation AG. URL: http://www.zapfcreation.com
ISO 8373:2012 Robots and robotic devices - Vocabulary. URL: https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/#iso:std:iso:8373:ed-2:v1:en (дата обращения: 14.03.2017).
Смирнова Е.О., Абдулаева Е.А. Куклы нашего времени // Вестник практической психологии образования. 2010. Т. 2006, № 2. С. 81-85.
Морозов И.А. Феномен куклы в традиционной и современной культуре : автореф. дис. ... д-ра ист. наук. М. : Индрик, 2011. 46 c.
Лотман Ю.М. Куклы в системе культуры // Лотман Ю.М. Избранные статьи : в 3 т. Таллинн, 1992. Т. I. С. 377-380.
Duffy B.R. Anthropomorphism and the social robot // Robotics and autonomous systems. 2003. Vol. 42, № 3. Р. 177-190.
Hegel F. et al. Understanding social robots // Advances in Computer-Human Interactions, 2009. ACHI'09. Second International Conferences on. IEEE. 2009. Р. 169-174.
Вейценбаум Д. Возможности вычислительных машин и человеческий разум: От суждений к вычислениям / пер. с англ. И.Б. Гуревича. М.: Радио и связь, 1982. 368 с.
Sharkey A., Sharkey N. Granny and the robots: ethical issues in robot care for the elderly // Ethics and information technology. 2012. Vol. 14, № 1. Р. 27-40.
Royakkers L., van Est R. A literature review on new robotics: automation from love to war // International journal of social robotics. 2015. Vol. 7, № 5. Р. 549-570.
Turkle S. Alone together: Why we expect more from technology and less from ourselves. 2011. URL: http://www.jamesjmarkey.com/uploads/3/4/9/8/3498982/edtc 802.a3.pdf (дата обращения: 14.03.2017).
Levy D. The ethical treatment of artificially conscious robots // International Journal of Social Robotics. 2009. Vol. 1, № 3. Р. 209-216.
Manta I.D., Olson D.S. Hello Barbie: First They Will Monitor You, Then They Will Discriminate Against You. Perfectly. 2015. Р. 135-187.
Michael K., Hayes A. High-Tech Child's Play in the Cloud: Be safe and aware of the difference between virtual and real // IEEE Consumer Electronics Magazine. 2016. Vol. 5, № 1. Р. 123-128.
Taylor E., Michael K. Smart Toys that are the Stuff of Nightmares [Editorial] // IEEE Technology and Society Magazine. 2016. Vol. 35, № 1. Р. 8-10.
Westlund J.K., Breazeal C., Story A. Deception, Secrets, Children, and Robots: What’s Acceptable // Workshop on The Emerging Policy and Ethics of Human-Robot Interaction, held in conjunction with the 10th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction. 2015.
Short E. et al. How to train your dragonbot: Socially assistive robots for teaching children about nutrition through play // Robot and Human Interactive Communication, 2014 RO-MAN: The 23rd IEEE International Symposium on. IEEE, 2014. Р. 924-929.
Hood D., Lemaignan S., Dillenbourg P. When children teach a robot to write: An autonomous teachable humanoid which uses simulated handwriting // Proceedings of the Tenth Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction. ACM, 2015. Р. 83-90.
Dautenhahn K., Billard A. Games Children with Autism Can Play with Robota //Universal Access and Assistive Technology: Proceedings of the Cambridge Workshop on UA and AT’02. Springer Science & Business Media, 2013. Р. 179.
Wainer J. et al. Using the humanoid robot KASPAR to autonomously play triadic games and facilitate collaborative play among children with autism // IEEE Transactions on Autonomous Mental Development. 2014. Vol. 6, № 3. Р. 183-199.