REPRESENTATIONS OF THE POSSIBLE ROBOT ROLE IN THE SOCIAL STATUS ABOVE HUMAN (ON THE EXAMPLE OF THE DEBATE GAME DISCOURSE) | Humanitarian Informatics. 2017. № 12. DOI: 10.17223/23046082/12/5

REPRESENTATIONS OF THE POSSIBLE ROBOT ROLE IN THE SOCIAL STATUS ABOVE HUMAN (ON THE EXAMPLE OF THE DEBATE GAME DISCOURSE)

In this study, we attempted to identify the role of the robot in the debate, using a comprehensive approach to collecting material (questioning using closed and open types of questions, analysis of robot questions in the first 20 minutes of interaction, analysis of calls to the robot during communication for several hours) and data analysis: qualitative and quantitative content analysis, semantic and discursive analysis). The key category in discussing the potential role of the robot in the debate was its intellectual capabilities. The direct interaction with the robot, this category is not actualized. The initial respondents presuppositions about the robot allowed its position to be lower than the person. During the interaction, students perceived the robot as a timekeeper (position above) as an equal living subject, the robot included in the informal interaction.

Download file
Counter downloads: 157

Keywords

социальная робототехника, социальный робот, взаимодействие человека и робота, социальный статус, дебаты, social robotics, social robot, human-robot interaction, social status, debate

Authors

NameOrganizationE-mail
Zilberman Nadezhda N.National Research Tomsk State Universityzilberman@ido.tsu.ru
Parkhomenko Andrey A.National Research Tomsk State Universityandreiparhomenco@mail.ru
Всего: 2

References

Breazeal C. Social interactions in HRI: the robot view // IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C: Applications and Reviews. 2004. Vol. 34, № 2. P. 181-186.
Shahid S., Krahmer E., Swerts M. Child-robot interaction across cultures: How does playing a game with a social robot compare to playing a game alone or with a friend? // Computers in Human Behavior. 2014. Vol. 40. P. 86-100.
Ferrer G., Garrell A., Sanfeliu A. Robot companion: A social-force based approach with human awareness-navigation in crowded environments // Intelligent robots and systems (IROS), 2013 IEEE/RSJ international conference on. IEEE, 2013. P. 1688-1694.
Gladden M.E. The Social Robot as ‘Charismatic Leader’: A Phenomenology of Human Submission to Nonhuman Power // Sociable Robots and the Future of Social Relations: Proceedings of Robo-Philosophy 2014. 2014. Vol. 273. P. 329.
Cormier D. et al. Would you do as a robot commands? an obedience study for human-robot interaction // International Conference on Human-Agent Interaction. 2013. URL: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/eb2b/e87b7d18e65cfb0b0008615f70aabefe0- c06.pdf
Chidambaram V., Chiang Y.H., Mutlu B. Designing persuasive robots: how robots might persuade people using vocal and nonverbal cues // Proceedings of the seventh annual ACM/IEEE international conference on Human-Robot Interaction. ACM, 2012. P. 293-300.
Siegel M., Breazeal C., Norton M.I. Persuasive robotics: The influence of robot gender on human behavior // Intelligent Robots and Systems, 2009. IROS 2009. IEEE/RSJ International Conference on. IEEE, 2009. P. 2563-2568.
Ham J. et al. Making robots persuasive: the influence of combining persuasive strategies (gazing and gestures) by a storytelling robot on its persuasive power // International conference on social robotics. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2011. P. 71-83.
Lee S.A., Liang Y. The role of reciprocity in verbally persuasive robots // Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking. 2016. Vol. 19, № 8. P. 524-527.
Ahmad M.I., Mubin O., Orlando J. Understanding behaviours and roles for social and adaptive robots in education: teacher's perspective // Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Human Agent Interaction. ACM, 2016. P. 297-304.
Kidd C.D., Breazeal C. Robots at home: Understanding long-term human-robot interaction // Intelligent Robots and Systems, 2008. IROS 2008. IEEE/RSJ International Conference on. IEEE, 2008. P. 3230-3235.
Agrawal S., Williams M.A. Robot Authority and Human Obedience: A Study of Human Behaviour using a Robot Security Guard // Proceedings of the Companion of the 2017 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction. ACM, 2017. P. 57-58.
Bartneck C. et al. The influence of robot anthropomorphism on the feelings of embarrassment when interacting with robots // Paladyn, Journal of Behavioral Robotics. 2010. Vol. 1, № 2. P. 109-115.
Geiskkovitch D.Y. et al. Please Continue, We Need More Data: An Exploration of Obedience to Robots // Journal of Human-Robot Interaction. 2015. Vol. 5, № 1. P. 82-99.
 REPRESENTATIONS OF THE POSSIBLE ROBOT ROLE IN THE SOCIAL STATUS ABOVE HUMAN (ON THE EXAMPLE OF THE DEBATE GAME DISCOURSE) | Humanitarian Informatics. 2017. № 12. DOI: 10.17223/23046082/12/5

REPRESENTATIONS OF THE POSSIBLE ROBOT ROLE IN THE SOCIAL STATUS ABOVE HUMAN (ON THE EXAMPLE OF THE DEBATE GAME DISCOURSE) | Humanitarian Informatics. 2017. № 12. DOI: 10.17223/23046082/12/5

Download full-text version
Counter downloads: 2266