Mathematical model of labour population shift
The dynamic model of Tiebout's hypothesis is offered to study interregional migratory streams. This model allows to formalize the regulation of the population movement by redistribution of capital investments between regions. There are considered N identical regions having own economy and the main production resources. Let х(к) be the amount of people living in the region i at the step k. Write the following difference equation for dynamics of change of the population: х(к+1)= x,(k) + W(k) - Y,(k), i=1,...,n, k=0,1,..., (1) where Wi(k) is the amount of people which arrives to region i at the step k, Yi(k) is the amount of the population which leaves region i at the step k. Here, for simplicity, natural change (increasing or decreasing) of the population is omitted. It is connected with the fact that this process rather slow. It follows from this assumption that the total population in all regions at each time step remains constant. Then, Y
t (k) = J zj, (k)x (k) < x (k), W
t (k) = J z
v (k)xj (k), (2) j=1 j=1 where zj(k) is the population share of the region i moved to the region j. It is obvious that the following conditions have to be satisfied: n z
u(k) = 0, 0i(k) < 1, i = 1,...,n. j=1 Substituting (2) in (1), we obtain the equations x, (k +1) = f 1 - J Zj (k) 1 x, (k) + J z j (k) Xj (k), i=\,...,n, k=0,1,.... (3) j=1 V j=
У The coefficients Zj(k) are defined by the region factors, which can be presented as follows: h. (k) = q. + , i = 1,...,n, k = 0,1,., x, (k) where q
t are constant factors (climate, cultural level, political stability, etc.), Z
t(k)/x
t(k) are economic factors: the ratio of capital investments Z,(k) into the region i to the amount of the people x,(k). According to Tiebout's hypothesis, there is a movement of the population from regions with the low total factor to regions with the high total factor proportionally to the difference of these factors. Mathematically it can be presented as Zji(k) = b, G{h/k)- h,(k)}, where fx, if x > 0, CT( x) = \ ' [0, if x < 0, bjj is the coefficient characterizing activity of inhabitants of the region i to remove to the region j. Note that in (3) it is possible a steady state when the migration between regions is lacking. It corresponds to a case when total factors of all regions are identical. The regulation of migration is carried out by redistribution of capital investments between regions. The task of optimum distribution of manpower resources between regions to maximize the total production efficiency is solved.
Keywords
миграция населения,
гипотеза Тибу,
распределение трудовых ресурсов,
бюджетный федерализм,
population shift,
Tiebout's hypothesis,
distribution of manpower,
budgetary federalismAuthors
Paraev Yury I. | Tomsk State University | paraev@mail.ru |
Ryumkin Alexander I. | Tomsk State University | airyumkin@mail.ru |
Tsvetnitskaya Svetlana A. | Tomsk State University | svetasa@sibmail.com |
Всего: 3
References
Tiebout C. A Pure Theory of Local Expenditures // The Journal of Political Economy. 1956. V. 64. Issue 5. Р. 416-424.
Oates R., Wallace E. An Essay on Fiscal Federalism // Journal of Economic Literature. 1999. Nc>. 9. P. 1120-1149.
Бесстремянная Г.Е. Применение гипотезы Тибу для российских муниципалитетов // Препринт # BSP/00/045 R. М. : Рос сийская экономическая школа, 2000. 47 с.
О Салливан А. Экономика города. 4-е изд. М. : Инфра-М, 2002. 706 с.
Макаров В.Л., Данков А.Н. Межтерриториальная и электоральная конкуренция // Препринт WP/2002/032. М. : Рос. экономи ческая школа, 2002. 22 c.
Пчелинцев О.С. Региональная экономика в системе устойчивого развития. М. : Наука, 2004. 108 c.
Итуэлл Дж., МилгейтаМ., Ньюмен П. Экономическая теория. М. : ИНФРА-М, 2004. 931 c.
Тихомиров Н.П. Демография. Методы анализа и прогнозирования. М. : Экзамен, 2005. 256 с.
WeingastB.R. Second generation fiscal federalism: The implications of fiscal incentives // Journal of Urban Economics. 2009. Na 7. P. 279-293.
Ларина С.Е. Бюджетная децентрализация: теория, методология и опыт реализации в Российской Федерации. М. : Наука, 2009. 198 с.
Ottaviano G.I.P., Thisse J.F. Integration, agglomeration and the political economics of factor mobility // Journal of Public Economics. 2002. Ыо. 4. Р. 429-456.
Kessler A.S., Lulfesmann C. Tiebout and redistribution in a model of residential and political choice // Journal of Public Economics. 2005. Ыо. 4. P. 501-528.