Elements of system and Su-field analysis of environmental monitoring tools (using the example of the geomagnetic data)
Decision-making in the field of technosphere safety is based on timely receipt of up-to-date and complete information about the state of the environment. Geomagnetic monitoring plays an important role in reducing the negative impact of extreme geophysical events on objects and systems of the technosphere (power lines, communication systems, railway automation, etc.). In this paper, geomagnetic monitoring is considered from the point of view of system approach, the main problems of obtaining geomagnetic data are identified and formulated, the main of which is incomplete coverage by the monitoring network. Using a Su-field representation, an approach is proposed and formalized, that extends the process of obtaining and using data with an interpolating computer model. The implementation of this model uses adaptive spatial interpolation to determine the optimal interpolation methods, taking into account the geographical location of the interpolated points and the global geomagnetic activity index. The effectiveness of the approach is demonstrated by the example of the geomagnetic information of the SuperMAG project using a web-based software solution. Contribution of the authors: the authors contributed equally to this article. The authors declare no conflicts of interests.
Keywords
system analysis,
Su-field analysis,
geomagnetic data,
spatial interpolation,
decision supportAuthors
| Vorobeva Gulnara R. | Ufa University of Science and Technology | gulnara.vorobeva@gmail.com |
| Vorobev Andrei V. | Ufa University of Science and Technology; Geophysical Center of RAS | geomagnet@list.ru |
| Farvaev Emil F. | Ufa University of Science and Technology | farvaev.emil@gmail.com |
| Orlov Gleb O. | Ufa University of Science and Technology | orlovgleb99@mail.ru |
Всего: 4
References
Vorobey A., Soloviev A., Pilipenko V., Vorobeva G., Sakharov Y. An Approach to Diagnostics of Geomagnetically Induced Currents Based on Ground Magnetometers Data // Appl. Sci. 2022. V. 12. Art. 1522. 10.3390/ app12031522.
Vorobev A.V., Vorobeva G.R. Approach to Assessment of the Relative Informational Efficiency of Intermagnet Magnetic Observatories // Geomagn. Aeron. 2018. V. 58. P. 625-628.
Кориков А.М., Павлов С.Н. Теория систем и системный анализ. М.: ИНФРА-М, 2024. 288 с.
Imboden D., Pfenninger S.Introduction to Systems Analysis Mathematically Modeling Natural Systems. Berlin,: Spinger, 2012. 252 p.
Петров В. Структурный анализ систем. Вепольный анализ. ТРИЗ. Екатеринбург: Издательские решения, 2018. 280 с.
Гареев Р.Т. Эвристические приема: ТРИЗ. М.: МГИУ, 2008. 134 с.
Vorobey A.V., Soloviev A.A., Pilipenko V.A., Vorobeva G.R.Interactive computer model for aurora forecast and analysis // Solar-Terrestrial Physics. 2022. V. 8 (2). P. 84-90.
Vorobev A.V., Pilipenko V.A., Krasnoperov R.I., Vorobeva G.R., Lorentzen D.A. Short-term forecast of the auroral oval position on the basis of the "virtual globe"' technology // Russ. J. Earth Sci. 2020. V. 20. Art. ES6001.
Gjerloev J.W. The SuperMAG data processing technique // J. Geophys. Res. 2012. V. 117. Art. A09213.
Waters C.L., Gjerloev J.W., Dupont M., Barnes R.J. Global maps of ground magnetometer data // J. Geophys. Res. Space Physics. 2015. V. 120. P. 9651-9660.
Zhang H., Tian Y., Zhao P. Dispersion Curve Interpolation Based on Kriging Method // Applied Sciences. 2023. V. 13 (4). Art. 2557.
Lebrenz H., Bardossy A. Geostatistical interpolation by quantile kriging // Hydrology and Earth System Sciences. 2019. V. 23. P. 1633-1648.
Alexa M. Conforming weighted Delaunay triangulations // ACM Transactions on Graphics. 2020. V. 39. P. 1-16.
Weng Y., Cao J., Chen Zh. Global optimization of optimal Delaunay triangulation with modified whale optimization algorithm // Engineering with Computers. 2024. V. 40. P. 1-22.
Nguyen L. et al. Design and Implementation of Web Application Based on MVC Laravel Architecture // European Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science. 2022. V. 6. P. 23-29.
Rahman M.H., Naderuzzaman M., Kashem M.A. et al.Comparative Study: Performance of MVC Frameworks on RDBMS // International Journal of Information Technology and Computer Science (IJITCS). 2024. V. 16 (1). P. 26-34.
Hule K., Ranawat R. Analysis of Different ORM Tools for Data Access Object Tier Generation: A Brief Study // International Journal of Membrane Science and Technology. 2023. V. 10. P. 1277-1291.
Marculescu B., Zhang M., Arcuri A. On the Faults Found in REST APIs by Automated Test Generation. // ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology. 2022. V. 31. P. 1-43.
Golmohammadi A., Zhang M., Arcuri A. Testing RESTful APIs: A Survey // ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology. 2023. V. 33 (1). Art. 27.
Bogner J., Kotstein S., Pfaff T. Do RESTful API design rules have an impact on the understandability of Web APIs? // Empirical Software Engineering. 2023. V. 28 (6). Art. 132.
