Organisation of interpersonal communication in the process of professionally-oriented foreign language training in higher education: experience of introducing the ideas of ethical phenomenology | Yazyk i Kultura – Language and Culture. 2025. № 71. DOI: 10.17223/19996195/71/10

Organisation of interpersonal communication in the process of professionally-oriented foreign language training in higher education: experience of introducing the ideas of ethical phenomenology

The relevance of the work is connected with the need to prepare a modern university graduate to participate in international projects to solve professional problems. The language of communication is English as the language of international communication. The conditions of intercultural interaction imply the ability to solve professional tasks in cooperation with people who may differ significantly. Cultural, religious perceptions have an impact on communication and can become an insurmountable barrier in the implementation of professional activities. Responding to the demands of the individual and professional sphere in the training of a university graduate capable of participating in intercultural interaction in the intermediary language, foreign language teaching at the university should be aimed at the formation of professionally oriented intercultural language personality of the learner. The formation of this type of language personality is possible through the professional orientation of foreign language speech activity and involvement of students in acquiring the experience of intercultural interaction. An appeal to the theoretical works devoted to the interaction of people who differ in cultural, religious ideas, representing different points of view, has shown that significant developments in this area belong to the French philosopher Emmanuel Levinas. In his works E. Levinas addresses the problem of cognition of being, the other person and oneself. The author calls the interlocutor the Other with a capital letter, recognises his right to otherness, the possibility of having his own values and ideas. Interaction with the Other should not be reduced to the desire to make him/her the same as you, to find common ground and rely on similarity. The philosopher's ideas are that interaction is realised through difference, which enriches our lives by expanding the ways of seeing the world. The experience of the Other, according to Levinas, should be perceived "in preference", manifesting the ethical component of human society. A necessary component of effective interaction with the Other are acts of solidarity as selfless assistance to the Other. Based on these theoretical provisions, it is possible to apply them to the preparation of students for intercultural interaction through the organisation of interpersonal communication situations in the educational process during classroom work. Interpersonal communication of students should be based on a respectful attitude to the interlocutor, recognition of his/her identity, the right to self-expression and self-realisation. To the knowledge and skills that ensure effective interaction, it is necessary to include scientific knowledge: about the social nature of culture, intersubjective relations through the acceptance of diversity. Overcoming cultural barriers on the basis of scientifically grounded knowledge about the nature of culture ensures the flow of intercultural communication in a rational understanding of differences. In addition to individual characteristics, interests and preferences, the differences between the participants of the study group are due to different levels of language training and the degree of involvement in future professional activities. It is possible to unite the efforts of students when solving tasks in research activities. Working in mini groups to achieve a common goal contributes to the emergence of acts of solidarity, taking into account the differences of participants. The development and organisation of research activities, providing interpersonal interaction of students in the intermediary language, was carried out in the process of foreign language training of students of the aerospace faculty of Perm National Research Polytechnic University. On the basis of the professional standard, the labour functions of a specialist graduate were specified, the problems of professional communication were identified, and professionally oriented content was selected. In order to intensify the foreign language speech activity of students and to provide the experience of interpersonal interaction, all classroom sessions were organised in the form of group work while solving research problems in the intermediate language. Independent work of students was aimed at individual development of skills and abilities of professionally oriented intercultural linguistic personality and was realised with the help of information technologies. In the process of foreign language communication in a group each participant has difficulties, which are related to the difficulty of extracting information from a foreign language text, extracting semantic information, lack of prior knowledge, processing information, correlation of the received information and the task to be solved, structuring and presentation of the message, lack of appropriate vocabulary and grammar, and others. The observation of the group work showed the presence of acts of solidarity in the following cases: providing a model, active listening, distribution of roles according to the needs and interests of the participants, checking and correcting the language design, creative solutions, respectful attitude to the ideas and proposals of all participants, tolerance to interrogations and clarifications, to the language difficulties of the students, understanding of responsibility for their own proposals and attempts to explain their expediency, attempts to explain the reasons, arguments, and the use of the language of the students' own proposals. The selected methodological techniques of organising interpersonal interaction of students in accordance with the stages of solving research problems promoted joint work of students and the emergence of acts of solidarity in the conditions of accepting the differences of interlocutors. The application of E. Levinas's theoretical ideas to the organisation of the educational process in higher education contributes to providing students with a positive experience of interpersonal interaction in the intermediary language. The authors declare no conflicts of interests.

Keywords

professionally oriented intercultural linguistic personality, professional training, E. Levinas' ethics, intercultural communication, interpersonal interaction, intermediary language, interlocutor differences, act of solidarity, group work

Authors

NameOrganizationE-mail
Timkina Yuliya Y.Perm National Research Polytechnic Universitytimkinaj@mail.ru
Alikina Elena V.Perm National Research Polytechnic Universityelenaalikina@yandex.ru
Всего: 2

References

Тимкина Ю.Ю., Безукладников К.Э. Ключевые характеристики профессиональноориентированной межкультурной языковой личности // Вестник Пермского национального исследовательского политехнического университета. Проблема: языкознания и педагогики. 2023. № 1. С. 8-18.
Серова Т.С., Гураль С.К., Бердникова А.А. Предметное содержание и структурная организация учебного дискурса при обучении доказательному монологическому высказыванию // Язык и культура. 2022. № 57. С. 240-257.
Халяпина Л.П. Междисциплинарная координация в системе профессионально-ориентированного обучения иностранным языкам в вузе // Вестник Пермского национального исследовательского политехнического университета. Проблемы языкознания и педагогики. 2017. № 2. С. 149-157.
Сысоев П.В. Подготовка педагогических кадров к реализации предметно-языкового интегрированного обучения в вузе // Высшее образование в России. 2021. № 5. С. 21 31.
Прохорова А.А., Безукладников В.К., Чечеткина А.И. Особенности обучения мультилингвальных преподавателей эпохи цифровизации // Язык и культура. 2021. № 56. С. 234-253.
Аликина Е.В., Рапакова Т.Б. Формирование инфографической компетенции в научно-исследовательской деятельности курсантов военного вуза в процессе изучения иностранного языка // Вестник Пермского национального исследовательского политехнического университета. Проблема: языкознания и педагогики. 2019. № 1. С. 147-157.
Deardorff D.K. Manual for developing intercultural competencies: Story circles. Routledge, 2019. 34 p.
Ямпольская А.В., Шолохова С.А. Предисловие к переводу статьи Эмманюэля Левинаса «Заметки о смысле» // (Пост)феноменология: новая феноменология во Франции и за ее пределами. Сер. Философские технологии. 2014. С. 11-17.
Lee S. Ethics is an Optics: Ethical Practicality and the Exposure of Teaching // Journal of Philosophy of Education. 2019. Vol. 53 (1). Р. 145-164.
Bruna M.G., Bazin Y. Answering Levinas' call in organization studies // European Management Review. 2018. Vol. 15 (4). Р. 577-588.
Tajalli P., Segal S. Levinas, weber, and a hybrid framework for business ethics // Philosophy of Management. 2019. Vol. 18 (1). Р. 71-88.
Сокулер З.А. Пассивнее самой пассивности: субъективность и идентичность в учении Э. Левинаса // Субъективность и идентичность / отв. ред. А.В. Михайловский. М. : ВШЭ, 2012. С. 198-211.
Калинина А. С. Понятие другого и этика в философии Э. Левинаса // Вестник Челябинского государственного университета. Философские науки. 2020. № 5. С. 124129.
Ferri G.Intercultural communication: Critical approaches and future challenges. Springe, 2018. 117 p.
Левинас Э. Время и Другой. Гуманизм другого человека. СПб. : Высшая религиознофилософская школа, 1999. 266 с.
Ямпольская А. Вклад Левинаса в феноменологию и в деконструкцию феноменологии // Логос. 2004. № 1 (41). С. 88-105.
Miller A. Levinas, ethics and the people: a reply to Soyoung Lee and Paul Standish // Journal of Philosophy of Education. 2019. Vol. 53 (2). Р. 440-452.
Metais F., Villalobos M. Embodied ethics: Levinas’ gift for enactivism // Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences. 2021. Vol. 20. Р. 169-190.
Saldukaityte J. Emmanuel Levinas and ethical materialism // Religions. 2021. Vol. 12 (10). Р. 870.
Strhan A. Levinas, Durkheim, and the everyday ethics of education // Levinas and the Philosophy of Education: Routledge. 2019. Dec 18. Р. 9-23.
Ryan U. Solidarity acts in the context of language diversity: Students’ encounters with epistemological difference // The Journal of Mathematical Behavior. 2022. Vol. 66. Р. 100946.
Buddeberg E. Thinking the other, thinking otherwise: Levinas’ conception of responsibility // Interdisciplinary Science Reviews. 2018. Vol. 43 (2). Р. 146-155.
Сысоев П.В. Пересматривая конструкт межкультурной компетенции: обучение межкультурному взаимодействию в условиях «диалога культур» и «не-диалога культур» // Язык и культура. 2018. № 43. С. 261-281.
Флиер А.Я. Культура как социально-регулятивная система и ее историческая типология // Культура культуры. 2014. № 2 (2).
Володина Е.В., Володина И.В. Формирование готовности к коммуникации в инновационной инженерной и научно-исследовательской деятельности у студентов технического вуза средствами иностранного языка // Перспективы науки и образования. 2020. № 5 (47). С. 122-134.
Brandom R. Articulating reasons: An introduction to inferentialism. Harvard University Press, 2009. 240 p.
 Organisation of interpersonal communication in the process of professionally-oriented foreign language training in higher education: experience of introducing the ideas of ethical phenomenology | Yazyk i Kultura – Language and Culture. 2025. № 71. DOI: 10.17223/19996195/71/10

Organisation of interpersonal communication in the process of professionally-oriented foreign language training in higher education: experience of introducing the ideas of ethical phenomenology | Yazyk i Kultura – Language and Culture. 2025. № 71. DOI: 10.17223/19996195/71/10

Download full-text version
Counter downloads: 81