The evaluation vector of a review in musical discourse | Yazyk i Kultura – Language and Culture. 2018. № 42. DOI: 10.17223/19996195/42/3

The evaluation vector of a review in musical discourse

This paper is the first to present the results of discourse analysis of the music disc reviews from BBC Music Magazine. Music communication management aims music values distribution and music and aesthetic tastes cultivation at the audience. This process takes place both at traditional philharmonic and concert hall stages as well as via media sources, such as radio, television and the press. A modern music magazine exceeds the scope of a print version and becomes a multimodal and multisensory resource. Music critics, whose reviews compile a significant part of the BBC Music Magazine volumes, play an important role in attracting readers to music life. Being members of a professional discourse community, the authors of these articles indirectly influence the development of music communication in the English-speaking world. The addressee of such journalistic messages are not only educated, by and large, music lovers, but also performers and sound companies. The article provides the notion of musical discourse. The results received in the process of qualitative and quantitative text analysis show, what lexical and stylistic means the music critics use to influence the audience, creating positive, satisfactory or negative image in readers. Evaluation requires the correspondence of the critic's inner scale with the one offered in BBC Music Magazine. Thus three basic evaluation modalities resulted in the division of star rated reviews in three groups. The first group includes four and five star reviews, where positive image of music is created with the help of adjectives sometimes intensified with adverbs and positive nouns. Comparison and metaphors are also frequently used. The balance in the description of positive and negative elements obtained by the use of contrasting conjunctions together with the verb lack form three star satisfactory reviews. Finally, negative lexical means and irony are characteristic of negative two star reviews. The explanation and the origin of nowadays modern star rating is also given in this article. The basic differences between the reviews of different types (positive, satisfactory and negative) were distinguished with the help of Tropes 8.4.4. program. The quantitative analysis revealed the highest subjectiveness in negative reviews, the balance of positive and negative features in satisfactory ones and small or very small quantity of negative elements in positive reviews.

Download file
Counter downloads: 187

Keywords

review, evaluation scale, music critic, musical discourse, evaluation, музыкальный критик, рецензия, шкала оценки, оценка, музыкальный дискурс

Authors

NameOrganizationE-mail
Vikulova L. G.Moscow City Pedagogical Universityvikulovalg@mail.ru
Shchepilova A. V.Moscow City Pedagogical Universitychepilovaa@yandex.ru
Vostrikova O. V.Pushkin Institute of Russian language; Moscow City Pedagogical Universityo.w.wolke@list.ru
Shevchenko N.L.Moscow City Pedagogical Universitynadezhdashevchenko86@gmail.com
Kasyanova N.B.Moscow City Pedagogical Universitykassianata@yandex.ru
Всего: 5

References

Levi-Strauss C. The Naked Man. The University of Chicago Press, 1990. 746 p.
BBC Music Magazine. February 2016. URL: https://newsstand.google.com/issues/ CAAqBwgKMOWWhQIwq_rQAg/sections/CAQqEAgAKgcICjDlloUCMKv60AIwt NjIAw?authuser=0 (дата обращения: 20.17.2016).
BBC Music Magazine. July 2015. URL: https://newsstand.google.com/issues/ CAAqBwgKMOWWhQIw0-LSAQ/sections/CAQqEAgAKgcICjDlloUCMNPi0gEwn6y ZAg?authuser=0 (дата обращения: 12.07.2016).
BBC Music Magazine. Dec. 2015. URL: https://newsstand.google.com/issues/ CAAqBwgKMOWWhQIw2eLSAQ/sections/CAQqEAgAKgcICjDlloUCMNni0gEw0o PSAw?authuser=1 (дата обращения: 15.07.2016).
Тулупов В.В. Техника и технология СМИ: печать, радио, телевидение, Интернет. СПб. : Изд-во Михайлова В. А., 2008. 320 с.
URL: https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/good (Толковый словарь Оксфорд).
URL: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/good (Толковый словарь Мериам Вебстер).
URL: http://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/good (Толковый словарь Кембридж).
Kress G., van Leeuwen T. Reading Images. The Grammar of Visual Design. London : Routledge, 1996. 288 p.
Основы теории коммуникации / под ред. М.А. Василика. М. : Гардарики, 2003. 615 с.
URL: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Star_(classification).
Алешинская Е.В. Теоретико-методологические основы разграничения жанров профессионального дискурса // Вестник Томского государственного университета. Филология. 2014. № 5 (31). С. 5-23.
Aleshinskaya E. Key components of Musical Discourse Analysis // Research in Language. 2013. № 11, vol. 4. P. 423-444. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/rela-2013-0007.
Bradby B. Discourse analysis // Continuum encyclopedia of popular music of the world / D. Horn, D. Laing, P. Oliver & P. Wicke (eds.). London ; New York : Continuum. P. 67-70.
URL: http://musicstudies.org/
Pavlovova M. Complex Linguistic Analysis of Musical Discourse. The Genre of Concert Notice. Saarbrucken : Lambert Academic Publishing, 2013. 272 p.
Lunden K. The Death of print? The Challenges and opportunities facing the print media on the web. Oxford : Reuters Institute Fellowship Paper, University of Oxford, 2009. 96 p.
Agawu K. Music as Discourse: Semiotic Adventures in Romantic Music. Oxford : Oxford University Press, 2009. 336 p.
Blacking J. The Structure of Musical Discourse: The Problem of the Song Text // Year book for Traditional Music. 1982. Vol. 14. P. 15-23.
Викулова Л.Г., Макарова И.В. Издательская деятельность как дискурсивная практи ка: книжный каталог // Когниция, коммуникация, дискурс. 2013. № 7. С. 23-32.
Викулова Л.Г., Серебренникова Е. Ф. Структуры моделирования ценностных ориен тиров дискурса социальной реальности в массмедийном коммуникативном пространстве // Вестник МГПУ. Сер. «Филология. Теория языка. Языковое образование». 2014. № 2 (14). С. 55-63.
Turino T. Music as Social Life: The Politics of Participation. Chicago : The University of Chicago Press, 2008. 258 p.
 The evaluation vector of a review in musical discourse | Yazyk i Kultura – Language and Culture. 2018. № 42. DOI:  10.17223/19996195/42/3

The evaluation vector of a review in musical discourse | Yazyk i Kultura – Language and Culture. 2018. № 42. DOI: 10.17223/19996195/42/3

Download full-text version
Counter downloads: 2580