ASTP to ACTFL: the Development of Rating Scales for Oral Language Testing in the USA | Yazyk i Kultura – Language and Culture. 2019. № 48. DOI: 10.17223/19996195/48/16

ASTP to ACTFL: the Development of Rating Scales for Oral Language Testing in the USA

The modern approach to oral language testing is the outgrowth of quite a long research and cooperative development of measurement instruments intended to evaluate how well a person speaks a language. Among these instruments the most important are rating (assessment) scales. Most studies seem to agree that the Foreign Services Institute rating scale devised in 1950-s in the USA originates rating scale methodology in oral language testing. The question then arises: is there evidence of the applications of performance rating scales prior to them? And how have they evolved over time? The present study based on data obtained from an archival database and secondary sources attempts to fill this gap and get an in-depth historical understanding of the subject. World War II and posterior wars and international conflicts, in which the United States participated, demanded to shift the language teaching curricula toward more aural and oral methods and to focus on speaking ability training which resulted in a shift in testing practices. The routine of testing speaking skills based on intuitive judgement of the experienced examiner did not score the tests accurately and so didn't meet the demands of the time. The problem was solved by introducing a new generation of measuring instruments - direct tests where the test taker's performance was judged against a fixed set of criteria described in rating scales on several ascending levels or bands. This work's originality is rooted in providing evidence of several applications of rating scales earlier in 1940-s by W. Kaulfers, F. Agard and H. Dunkel. A brief chronological account helped to trace back their evolution and detect the current state. It also helped "looking back to look forward" and get some perspectives for their future. We suggest that further development of oral language assessment techniques would be associated not only with the construction of computer and Internet versions of tests, but also their computer-aided assessment. Today, the solution of such global tasks is impossible without a broad interdisciplinary approach and joint efforts of highly qualified specialists from different countries. Knowledge and professional comprehension of events in the history of applied linguistics and language testing, as well as reliance on previous experience, can determine their success.

Download file
Counter downloads: 117

Keywords

история языкового тестирования, устное тестирование, критериальное оценивание, рейтинговые шкалы, оценочные шкалы, шкала FSI, шкала ILR, шкала ACTFL, Language testing history, oral testing, criterion referenced assessment, rating scales, assessment scales, FSI scale, ILR scale, ACTFL scale

Authors

NameOrganizationE-mail
Baluyan S.R.Southern Federal Universitybaluyans@sfedu.ru
Всего: 1

References

Цатурова И.А Из истории развития тестов в СССР и за рубежом. Таганрог, 1969.
Цатурова И.А., Балуян С.Р. Тестирование устной коммуникации. М. : Высш. шк., 2004.
EUson D. G., EUson E. C. Historical note on the rating scale // Psychological Bulletin. 1953. № 50 (5). P. 383-384.
McReynolds P., Ludwig K. On the history of rating scales // Personality and Individual Differences. 1987. № 8 (2). P. 281-283.
Myron H. Teaching French to the Army // The French Review. 1944. № 17 (6). P. 345-52.
Ghigo F. Standardized Tests in the ASTP at the University of North Carolina // The French Review. 1944. № 17 (6). P. 358-360.
Kaulfers W. V. War-time developments in modern language achievement testing // Modern Language Journal. 1944. № 28. P. 136-150.
Agard F., Dunkel H. An investigation of second-language teaching. Chicago : Ginn & Company, 1948.
Barnwell D.P. A History of Foreign Language Testing in the United States: from its begin nings to the present. Tempe, Arizona : Bilingual Press, 1996.
Stansfield C.W. ACTFL Speaking proficiency guidelines. ERIC Digest. Washington, DC : ERIC Clearinghouse on Languages and Linguistics, 1992. Retrieved from ERIC database (ED 347 852).
Spolsky B. Measured words. Oxford : Oxford University Press, 1995.
Sollenberger H. Development and Current Use of the FSI Oral Interview Test // Direct testing of speaking proficiency. Theory and application / Clark L.D. (ed.). Princeton, NJ : Educational Testing Service, 1978. P. 1-12.
Wilds C.P. The Oral Interview Test // Testing Language Proficiency / R.L. Jones, B. Spol-sky (eds). Washington, DC : Center for Applied Linguistics,1975. P. 29-38.
Lowe P. The ILR Oral Interview: Origins, Applications, Pitfalls, and Implications // Die Unterrichtspraxis. 1983. № 16 (2). P. 230-244.
 ASTP to ACTFL: the Development of Rating Scales for Oral Language Testing in the USA | Yazyk i Kultura – Language and Culture. 2019. № 48. DOI: 10.17223/19996195/48/16

ASTP to ACTFL: the Development of Rating Scales for Oral Language Testing in the USA | Yazyk i Kultura – Language and Culture. 2019. № 48. DOI: 10.17223/19996195/48/16

Download full-text version
Counter downloads: 1851