Reframing as a Factor of Discourse Efficiency in Political Discourse of the Spanish Party Podemos | Yazyk i Kultura – Language and Culture. 2021. № 53. DOI: 10.17223/19996195/53/4

Reframing as a Factor of Discourse Efficiency in Political Discourse of the Spanish Party Podemos

The methodological combination of contextual, linguocognitive, lexico-semantic, discourse and frame analysis tools provides an opportunity to present an integrated study of the Spanish party Podemos communicative strategy basing on its key messages from 2014 to 2019. The study assesses the systemic laws of the impact of cognitive-discursive techniques, that interpreter exercises over the individual and collective cognitive space of target groups, as well as interconnections and interactions that determine the dynamics of communicative intentions and pragmalinguistic mechanisms that lead to the implementation of necessary social actions. The article reveals the dependence of Podemos on the reframing technique in accordance with the pragmatic framework and meaningful function of the current socio-political context in order to increase the effectiveness of key messages to strengthen the support of the electorate. The hypothesis of the conditionality of the discursive change of the frame is confirmed by Podemos determination to transform an unfavorable communicative situation in favor of the addresser. The frequent indicators of the reframing procedure are the use of basic concepts and metaphorical models of antagonism, multilingual and gender-marked references, and contrast statistics. The achievement of illocutionary goals and speech power intensification of the Podemos discourse are determined by constructing the image by building certain sequences of speech acts - representatives, commissives and directives - that guarantee independent shaping of assessments in the consciousness of the addressee. Particular attention is paid to the analysis of combinations of discourse pragmalinguistic parameters, such as performance, empathy and manipulation, thanks to which Podemos incorporates effectively and organically its own discourse into the public agenda with an eye to the subsequent dominance of the previously defined picture of the world in the minds of voters.

Download file
Counter downloads: 102

Keywords

Podemos, frame reframing, discourse analysis, pragmalinguistics, political discourse, performativity, empathy

Authors

NameOrganizationE-mail
Larionova M. V.Moscow State Institute of International Relationslarionova.m@list.ru
Demkina A. V.Embassy of the Russian Federation in the Argentine Republic, Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federationa.v.dyomkina@yandex.ru
Всего: 2

References

Кубрякова Е. С. Язык и знание: На пути получения знаний о языке: Части речи с когнитивной точки зрения. Роль языка в познании мира. М. : Языки славянской культуры, 2004. 560 с.
Иванова С.В., Чанышева З.З. Слово в контексте культурно-исторического универсума на примере политического дискурса // Вестник Российского университета дружбы народов. Серия: Лингвистика. 2018. Т. 22, № 4. С. 821-843.
Ван Дейк Т. А., Кинч В. Стратегии понимания связного текста. Новое в зарубежной лингвистике. М., 1988. Вып. 23.
Арутюнова Н.Д. Метафора и дискурс // Теория метафоры. М. : Прогресс, 1990. С. 5-32.
Lakoff G. No pienses en un elefante. Lenguaje y debate politico. Madrid : Foro Complutense, 2007. (In Spanish).
Иссерс О. С. Коммуникативные стратегии и тактики русской речи. 5-е изд. М. : Изд-во ЛКИ, 2008. 288 с.
Lakoff R. Persuasive Discourse and Ordinary Conversation, with Examples from Advertising // Analyzing Discourse: Text and Talk / D. Tannen (ed.). Washington DC : Georgetown University Press, 1982. P. 25-42.
Van Dijk T.A Discourse, Power and Access. Texts and Practices: Readings in Critical Discourse Analysis / C.R. Caldas-Coulthard, M. Coulthard (eds). L. : Routledge, 1996. Р. 84-104.
Апресян Ю.Д. Типы коммуникативной информации для толкового словаря. Язык: система и функционирование. М., 1988. С. 10-22.
Демьянков В.З. Доминирующие лингвистические теории в конце XX века // Язык и наука конца XX века. М. : Ин-т языкознания РАН, 1995. С. 239-320.
Van Dijk T.A. Society and discourse: how social contexts influence text and talk. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 2009.
Searle John R. A classification of illocutionary acts // Language in Society. 1976. № 5. P. 1-23.
Арутюнова Н.Д., Гутнер Г.Б. Прагматика. Гуманитарная энциклопедия. Центр гуманитарных технологий, 2002-2018 (последняя редакция: 25.08.2018). URL: https://gtmarket.ru/concepts/6935
Горбачева Е. Н. Категория фактогенности как прагматическая основа перформативности (на материале русско- и англоязычного юридического дискурса) // Вестник ЛГУ им. А.С. Пушкина. 2015. № 1. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/kategoriya-faktogennosti-kak-pragmaticheskaya-osnova-performativnosti-na-materiale-russko-i-angloyazychnogo-yuridicheskogo-diskursa
Блакар Р. Язык как инструмент социальной власти // Язык и моделирование социального взаимодействия. М., 1987. C. 88-125.
Кара-Мурза С.Г. Манипулирование сознанием. М. : Эксмо, 2005. 832 с.
Van Dijk T.A. Discourse and manipulation // Discourse & Society. 2006. Vol. 17 (2). P. 359-383.
 Reframing as a Factor of Discourse Efficiency in Political Discourse of the Spanish Party Podemos | Yazyk i Kultura – Language and Culture. 2021. № 53. DOI: 10.17223/19996195/53/4

Reframing as a Factor of Discourse Efficiency in Political Discourse of the Spanish Party Podemos | Yazyk i Kultura – Language and Culture. 2021. № 53. DOI: 10.17223/19996195/53/4

Download full-text version
Counter downloads: 1739