The discourse analysis in overcoming difficulties on teaching the literary translation | Language and Culture. 2014. № 3.

The discourse analysis in overcoming difficulties on teaching the literary translation

Download file

Counter downloads: 206

Keywords

discourse, text, discourse analysis, lingvo-cognitive approach, cognitive-discourse approach, cognitive paradigm, structure of discourse, literary text

Authors

Name	Organization	E-mail
		ste-bojko@yandex.ru

Всего: 1

References

BOBYLYOV, B.G., 1991. Theoretical bases of the philological analysis of the literary text in national teacher training University. The abstract of the doctoral dissertation. Moscow: Institute of the National-Russian bilingualism of NPA of the USSR. 2 items of l.

GORELIKOV, M.I. and MAGOMEDOV, D.M., 1989. Linguistical analysis of the literary text. 2nd prod. fixed. and ed. Moscow: Russian language, 150 p.

NOVIKOV, L.A., 2007. Literary text and its analysis. the 3rd, prod. fixed. Moscow: URRS: LKI, 304 p.

VASILYEVA, A.N., 1995. Stylistical analysis of language of literary text. Moscow: Rain bow, 185 p.

ROSTOVA, E.G., 1994. Lingvostranovedchesky analysis and interpretation of literary text. Moscow: Ying t of Russian of A.S. Pushkin, 147 p.

ARNOLD, I.V., 2010. Stylistic of modern English (decoding stylistics). Moscow: Publish ing house: Flint; Science. 384 p.

KIBRIK, A.A., 2003. The discourse analysis in cognitive prospect: dissertation in the form of science paper. Dr. philological sciences. Moscow. 90 p.

CHAFE, W., 1994. Discourse, consciousness and time. The flow and displacement of con scious experience in speaking and writing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

GIVON, T. ed., 1983. Topic continuity in discourse: An introduction.

TOMLIN, R., 1995. Focal attention, voice and word order: An experimental cross-linguistic study. Downing, P. and Noonan, M. ed. Word order in discourse. Amsterdam: Benjamins, pp. 517-554.

LONGACRE, R., 1983. The grammar of discourse. New York: Plenum Press.

HALLIDAY, M.A.M., 1985. An introduction to functional grammar. London: Arnold.

MANN, W. and THOMPSON, S., 1992. Rhetorical structure theory and text analysis.

POLANYI, L., 1988. A formal model of the structure of discourse. Journal of Pragmatics.

LABOV, W., 1972. Language in the Inner City: Studies in the Black English Vernacular. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

VAN DIJK, T.A. and KINTSCH, W., 1983. Strategies of discourse comprehension. New York: Academic Press.

GERNSBACHER, M.A., 1990. Language comprehension as structure building. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

KUBRYAKOVA, E.S., 2000. About concepts of a discourse and the discursive analysis of modern linguistics: (Review). Discourse, speech, speech activity: Functional and structural aspects: reviews. Moscow, pp. 7-26.

KUBRYAKOVA, E.S. and ALEXANDROVA, O.V., 1997. Types of text and discourse spaces. World Categorization: space and time: Materials of scientific conference. Moscow: Dialogue Moscow State University, 190 p.