Self-defense of civil rights and accountability measures

In the modern development of private law, especially important to the issue of protection of civil rights measures independent, one-sided, because the specifics of private relations requires a particular sectoral measures to counter various independent attacks on personal rights. Currently, self-defense enshrined in the law as a way to curb rights violations (Art. 14 of the Civil Code), but pandectists right to exist, and there are measures of self-defense is not only preclusive but reductive character, which emphasizes the possibility of the existence of self-defense as a means of redress, including in the domestic civil law. Self-defense is a form of protection is realized mainly way to prevent them, and sometimes the way to restore them if permitted by law. Within the industry, there are forms of self-defense unilateral protection measures (human rights unilateral action). Unilateral measures relate human rights to a broad concept of civil protection, which also includes the concept of civil liability, because it is inherent in the recovery (compensation) character. In a narrow sense, specific protection measures are not the same responsibility, not least because it can be implemented the first subjects of civil relations unilaterally and independently, that is, without the participation of public-powerful, and do not involve any additional charges for a particular offender. In a retrospective aspect of the civil liability of the state and sold exclusively by force. Therefore, measures of civil liability are always connected with the other party relationship, the offender. Measure the civil protection can also be used in the absence of a specific offense, they can not be associated with the adverse effects of sanctions and for a particular offender. It should not be considered responsible as a protective legal relationship, because the responsibility does not arise solely in independent legal relationship of protective detention, and is an internal component of any civil legal relationship as the undisturbed in the form of predetermined regulatory or contractually possible applicable measures of responsibility or specific measures implemented in the case of the offense. Self-protection and judicial protection in combination provide both prevention of violations and the restoration of rights, but the mechanism of forced implementation of the final functional aim of protecting the rights - to restore them by applying measures of responsibility belongs only to the state.

Keywords

Authors

References