Criminal legal proceeding and criminalistics: the role of the version in the establishment of the truth | Tomsk State University Journal of Law. 2015. № 4(18).

Criminal legal proceeding and criminalistics: the role of the version in the establishment of the truth

The interrelation and unity of criminalistics and criminal procedure right is indisputable. Such communication is the most obvious during the proof. The reason of it is scientific justification of transition from knowledge of material and ideal traces of the mechanism of criminal activity to criminal prosecution and appointment guilty fair punishment or to refusal of criminal prosecution innocent, to release them from punishment, rehabilitation of everyone who unreasonably underwent criminal prosecution. One of the functions of criminalistics is ensuring such transition, which has the greatest practical value. At present time, refusal of establishment of truth on criminal case can lead to essential derogation of level of security of the personality's rights in the sphere of criminal legal proceedings. Obviously, it's a difficult process of clarification of truth on during the preliminary investigation, ensuring compliance of all established circumstances of the committed crime of the objective reality existing at the time of the crime's commission. More over, it's a way from ignorance to knowledge, from knowledge of small, private factors of the investigated crime to knowledge of all its parties, to establishment of the person, it made. The investigator's thinking in the form of investigative versions, development and verification of investigative versions is one of methods of knowledge of an objective truth of criminal legal proceedings. The investigative version is a truth learning tool as is one of possible explanations of collected material which has or can be related to the investigated case. This requirement makes also the concrete practical sense: it is necessary to build not any investigative versions, and only investigative versions, which follow from collected material, only reasonable, really possible investigative versions. During the investigation by check of established facts and circumstances, by gradual collecting of proofs one versions disappear, and degree of probability of others raises. This process of quantitative changes happens until leads to high-quality changes of our knowledge of the studied event until the probable knowledge is replaced with the reliable knowledge. Anyway, the only way of achievement of truth is considered transition from probability to reliability, and in this transition play probabilistic knowledge huge role.

Download file
Counter downloads: 279

Keywords

версия, истина, достоверность, вероятность, уголовный процесс, version, truth, reliability, probability

Authors

NameOrganizationE-mail
Smirnova Irina G.The Baikal state University of Economics and law (Irkutsk)smirnova-ig@mail.ru
Egereva Olesya A.The Baikal state University of Economics and law (Irkutsk)olirk@mail.ru
Всего: 2

References

Смахтин Е.В., Смирнова И.Г. Обеспечение защиты прав потерпевшего уголовно-процессуальными и криминалистическими средствами при реализации назначения уголовного судопроизводства // Криминологический журнал Байк. гос. ун-та экономики и права. 2015. Т. 9, № 2. С. 359-369.
Ишэн Ю. Юридическая истина в определении сущности предмета доказывания // Lex russica. 2014. № 1. С. 58-66.
Пещак Я. Следственные версии. Криминалистическое исследование / под ред. А.Р. Ра-тинова: пер. со словацкого д.ю.н. А. М. Ларина. М.: Прогресс, 1976. 228 с.
Старченко А.А. Гипотеза. М.: Госюриздат, 1962. 72 с.
Горский Г.Ф. Проблемы доказательств в советском уголовном процессе. Воронеж: Изд-во Воронеж. ун-та, 1978. 303 с.
Проблемы судебной этики / под ред. М.С. Строговича. М.: Наука, 1974. 272 с.
Перлов И.Д. Исполнение приговора в советском уголовном процессе. М.: Юрид. лит., 1963. 227 с.
Строгович М.С. Материальная истина и судебные доказательства в советском уголовном процессе. М.: Изд-во АН СССР, 1955. 384 с.
Белкин Р.С. Криминалистика и доказывание (методологические проблемы). М.: Юрид. лит., 1969. 216 с.
Петрухин И.Л. Истина, достоверность и вероятность в суде // Юрид. мир. 2003. № 8. С. 17-25.
Гросс Г. Руководство для судебных следователей как система криминалистики. Новое изд., перепеч. с изд. 1908 г. М.: ЛекЭст, 2002. 1088 с.
Строгович М.С. Курс советского уголовного процесса: в 2 т. Т. 1: Основные положения науки советского уголовного процесса. М.: Наука, 1968. 472 с.
Хмыров А. А. Проблемы теории доказывания: учеб. пособие. Краснодар, 1996. 154 с.
Овсянников И. Логика доказывания в уголовном процессе // Российская юстиция. 1998. № 9. С. 5-6.
Ивашина В.М. Роль следственной версии в установлении истины в уголовном судопроизводстве // Вестн. Саратов. гос. академии права. 2011. № 1. С. 148-152.
 Criminal legal proceeding and criminalistics: the role of the version in the establishment of the truth | Tomsk State University Journal of Law. 2015. № 4(18).

Criminal legal proceeding and criminalistics: the role of the version in the establishment of the truth | Tomsk State University Journal of Law. 2015. № 4(18).

Download full-text version
Counter downloads: 1127
Download file