Impossibility of performance of an obligation in Turkish and Swiss civil law in the context of Russian Civil Code reform: features of reception and development (part II)
The article is devoted to comparative analysis of creation and development of the institutions of impossibility of performance of an obligation in Turkish, Swiss, German and Russian law. Amendments to Russian Civil Code in relation to impossibility of performance which came into force on June, 1 2015 are estimated. Author gives the recommendations for the future development of Russian institution of impossibility of performance taking into consideration the results of the same institutions' reforms in Turkish and German law dated 2012 and 2002, respectively, and current reform of Swiss Code of Obligations. This research is relevant due to features of studies legal institution which can be called as a «field of struggle» between different legal traditions gradually taking the form of harmonization. It was created on the basis of the doctrine of the pandect law school in the end of XIX century. So called pandect model of impossibility of performance of an obligation by German civilest Friedrich Mommsen was adopted literally or with the minor modifications by most of the countries of the Romano-Germanic legal systems during the XIX century. For example, it was realized in Swiss Code of Obligations dated 1912 and - by copying of the French version of the latter - in Turkish Code of Obligations dated 1926. Currently the institution of impossibility of performance of the obligations are under the reform influenced by the such lex mercatoria as UNIDROIT Principles of International Commercial Contracts, Principles of European Contract Law and Draft Common Frame of Reference. These soft law acts were created taking into consideration of the approach of the Anglo-Saxon law to the regulation of private relationship. Thus, studied legal institution can be interesting for all those interested in the phenomenon of legal globalization. Research allows concluding that Swiss version of the Pandect model of the studied legal institution is adopted by Turkish legislator. However, if the latter keeps unchangeable from 1912, its Turkish analogue was developed in 2012. The scale of Turkish civil law reform was slight, but its character is very indicative. Inspite of the fact that the Pandect model of impossibility of performance of an obligation is sharply criticized by the modern European scientists, that is why some legal systems (in particular, German one) rejected it, Turkish legislator during its reform of civil law demonstrated adherence to the pandect model of this institute. This fact is confirmed, for example, by the norms of the Turkish Code of Obligations settled the legal consequences of the subsequent impossibility of performance of an obligation.
Keywords
невозможность исполнения обязательства,
обязательственное право Турции,
Швейцарии и Германии,
реформа ГК РФ,
impossibility of performance of an obligation,
Turkish,
Swiss and German obligation law,
Russian Civil Code reformAuthors
| Terdi Ekaterina S. | Tomsk State University | Muhacheva_ekater@mail.ru |
Всего: 1
References
Терди Е.С. Невозможность исполнения обязательства в гражданском праве Турции и Швейцарии в контексте реформы ГК РФ: особенности рецепции и развития (Ч. I) // Вестн. Том. гос. ун-та. Право. 2016. № 1(19). С. 111-120.
Bundesgesetz betreffend die Erganzung des Schweizerischen Zivilgesetzbuches (Funfter Teil: Obligationenrecht) : Beschluss 30 Marz 1911, Inkrafttreten 1 Januar 1912, Quelle AS 27 317 [Electronic resource]. URL.: https://www.admin.ch/opc/de/classified-compilation/19110009/ index.html#fn1 (access date: 10.04.2016).
Türk Borçlar Kanunu : Kanun numarasi 6098, Kabul Tarihi 11/1/2011 [Electronic resource] // Resmi Gazete. 2011. № 27836. URL: http://www.mevzuat.gov.tr/MevzuatMetin/1.5.6098.pdf (access date: 10.04.2016).
Aksoy H.C. Impossibility in Modern Private Law: A Comparative Study of German, Swiss and Turkish Laws and the Unification Instruments of Private Law. London: Springer International Publishing, 2014. 219 p.
Bürgerliches Gesetzbuch[Electronic resource] // Bundesministerium der Justiz. Electronic data. [S.l. et a.]. URL: http://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/bgb (access date: 10.04.2016).
UNIDROIT Principles of International Commercial Contracts, 2010. Rome : UNIDROIT, 2010. 454 p.
The Principles of European Contract Law (Parts I and II revised 1998; Part III revised 2002) [Electronic resource] // UiO: Det juridiske fakultet. Electronic data. Oslo, [s.a.]. URL: http://www.jus.uio.no/lm/eu.contract.principles.parts.1.to.3.2002/8.102.html (access date: 10.04.2016).
Principles, Definitions and Model Rules of European Private Law. Draft Common Frame of Reference (DCFR). - Munich : Sellier, 2009. 642 p.
О применении судами некоторых положений Гражданского кодекса Российской Федерации об ответственности за нарушение обязательств [Электронный ресурс] : постановление Пленума Верховного Суда Российской Федерации от 24 марта 2016 г. № 7 // КонсультантПлюс : справ. правовая система. Версия Проф. Электрон. дан. М., 2016. Доступ из локальной сети Науч. б-ки Том. гос. ун-та, свободный.
Bürgerliches Gesetzbuch. Alte Fassung [Electronic resource] // Dejure.org. Electronic data. [S.l. et a.]. URL: http://dejure.org/gesetze/0BGB010102 (access date: 10.04.2016).
Мухачева Е.С. Прекращение обязательства невозможностью его исполнения // Вестн. Том. гос. ун-та. Право. 2014. № 3(13). С. 116-125.
Мухачева Е.С. Невозможность исполнения обязательства в российском, европейском и единообразном частном праве: дис.. канд. юрид. наук. Томск, 2013. 228 с.
Мухачева Е.С. Соотношение экономической и практической невозможности исполнения обязательств // Вестн. Том. гос. ун-та. 2012. № 365. С. 108-111.
Aksoy H.C., Schafer H-B. Economic Impossibility in Turkish Law from the Perspective of Law and Economics [Electronic resource] // researchgate.net. Electronic data. [S.l. et a.]. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/240135103_Economic_impossibility_in_Turkish_contract_la w_from_the_perspective_of_law_and_economics (access date: 10.04.2016).
Develioglu H.M. The adaptation of the contracts [Electronic resource] // erdem-erdem.com. -Electronic data. [S.l. et a.]. URL: http://www.erdem-erdem.com/en/articles/the-adaptation-of-contracts/ (access date: 10.04.2016).
Develioglu H.M. Court of cassation decisions regarding the scope of the application of article 138 of the Turkish code of obligations of indebtedness in foreign currencies [Electronic resource] // erdem-erdem.com. Electronic data. [S.l. et a.]. URL: http://www.erdem-erdem.com/en/articles/court-of-cassation-decisions-regarding-the-scope-of-the-application-of-article-138-of-the-turkish-code-of-obligations-of-indebtedness-in-foreign-currencies/ (access date: 10.04.2016).
Сарбаш С.В. Исполнение обязательства по частям [Электронный ресурс] // Вестн. ВАС РФ. 2003. № 12. Электрон. версия печат. публ. URL: http://www.lawmix.ru/comm/3493/_(дата обращения: 10.04.2016).
Грибанов В.П. Осуществление и защита гражданских прав [Электронный ресурс] // Классика российского права. Электрон. версия печат. публ. URL: http://civil.consultant.ru/ elib/books/1/page_17.html (дата обращения: 10.04.2016).
Schweizer Obligationenrecht 2020 Entwurf fur einen neuen allgemeinen Teil [Electronic resource] // orco2020. Electronic data. [S.l. et a.]. URL: http://or2020.ch/ (access date: 10.04.2016).
