Freedom of religion in China and in Russia: modern legal framework and the system of state restrictions | Tomsk State University Journal of Law. 2018. № 28. DOI: 10.17223/22253513/28/4

Freedom of religion in China and in Russia: modern legal framework and the system of state restrictions

According to the Constitution of 1982 (amended in 2004), People's Republic of China (PRC) is proclaimed a secular country. However, the society in this state has very long religious traditions. There are different religious beliefs there with an increasing number of followers. This makes the bodies of public power contact with various religious institutes. Having analyzed national laws and rules, it is possible to conclude that a religious policy of China is aimed at the prevention of free activity of religious organizations of new and unrecognized beliefs. The similar purposes of legal regulation were established in Russia at adoption of the Federal law Russian Federation of 26.10.1997 No. 125-FZ (an edition of 06.07.2016) "About freedom of worship and about religious associations" and its subsequent changes that enables us to take into account a positive experience of China. Legal regulation in the sphere of freedom of worship in China has a number of features and a controlled character of religion is the main of them. Besides this fundamental beginning, it is possible to point out several principles of Chinese policy in the sphere under consideration. Religion cannot be used as the tool for a disorderly conduct in the country. Moreover, the government of the PRC can create, change the status and unregister religious organizations; it exercises supervision of places within which religious activity is carried out. It is necessary to get a construction license before any activities for construction of a religious object begin. Moreover, the government of China operates personnel of the religious organizations. Any information about the appointment to the post or dismissal in the religious organization, as well as about the vacancy of the main religious post is reported to a public authority. Taking into account a negative experience of activity of foreign powers in China throughout the 19th century noted by oppression, operation and mockeries, the Chinese government is suspicious about the activity of foreign missionaries and foreign organizations in the country. Any foreign religious organization, which wants to conduct religious activity in the PRC, has to enter strong relationship with the contact Chinese religious organization. Russia and China build their relationship with religious institutes on the basis of secular principles. However, in each country restrictions for realization of freedom of worship and freedom of worship are set. Often they have an arbitrary and excessive character. This complicates the construction of a truly constitutional state as it is proclaimed in Article 1 of the Constitution of the Russian Federation and Article 5 of the Constitution of the People's Republic of China and will result in the destruction of statehood and destabilization of the civil world.

Download file
Counter downloads: 149

Keywords

светское государство, религиозные организации, конфессиональная политика, государственные ограничения, свобода совести, secular state, religious organizations, confessional policy, state restrictions, freedom of worship

Authors

NameOrganizationE-mail
Isaeva Anastasia A.Tomsk State Universitytess@mail2000.ru
Всего: 1

References

Васильев Л.С. Культы, религии, традиции в Китае. М. : Восточная литература, 2001.
Цзянь В., Горобец Л.А. Даосизм в современном Китае. СПб. : Петербургское востоковедение, 2005. 156 с.
Dillon M. Religious minorities and China. London : Minority Rights Group International, 2001. 32 р.
Hassall G. Baha’i Country Notes: China. History of the Baha'i community in China. URL: https://bahai-library.com/hassall_notes_china (дата обращения: 15.03.2018).
Xin X. The Jews of Kaifeng China: History, Culture and Religion. Jersey City, NJ: KTAV Publishing House, 2003. 197 р.
Lieu, Samuel N.C. Manichaeism in Central Asia and China. Leiden; New York; Köln; Brill : Brill Academic Publ., 1998. 258 р.
О свободе совести и о религиозных объединениях: Федеральный закон РФ от 26.10.1997 № 125-ФЗ // Собрание законодательства РФ. 29.09.1997. № 39. Ст. 4465.
The European Court of Human Rights. Judgment of 1 October 2009. Kimlya and Others v. Russia, Applications nos. 76836/01, 32782/03. URL: http://hudoc.echr. coe.int/eng?i=001-94565 (дата обращения 15.03.2018).
Законопроект № 1039149-6 «О внесении изменений в Федеральный закон “О противодействии терроризму” и отдельные законодательные акты Российской Федерации в части установления дополнительных мер противодействия терроризму и обеспечения общественной безопасности». URL: http://asozd2.duma.gov.ru/ main.nsf/%28SpravkaNew%29?OpenAgent&RN=1039149-6&02 (дата обращения:15.03.2018).
Стенограмма 396 заседания Совета Федерации. URL: http://www.council.gov.ru/activity/meetings/69433/transcript/ (дата обращения: 15.03.2018).
Worden Robert L., Matles Savada A., Ronald Dolan E. China: a country study. Washington, D.C. : Federal Research Division, Library of Congress, 1988. 788 р.
Kolodner E. Religious Rights in China: A Comparison of International Human Rights Law and Chinese Domestic Legislation // Human Rights Quarterly. 1994. № 3. Р. 407-430.
宗教事务条例. URL: http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/content/2017-09/07/content_5223 282 .htm (дата обращения: 15.03.2018).
Pitman Potter B. Belief in Control: Regulation of Religion in China // The China Quarterly. 2003. № 174. Р. 317-337.
Waye V., Xiong P. The Relationship Between Mediation and Judicial Proceedings in China // Asian Journal of Comparative Law. 2011. Vol. 6.
中国宗教概况. 国家宗教事务局. URL: http://www.sara.gov.cn/old/ zwgk/ 17839.htm (дата обращения 15.03.2018).
China. International Religious Freedom Report for 2016. U.S. Department of State. URL: https://www.state.gov/j/drl/rls/irf/religiousfreedom/index. htm#wrapper (дата обращения: 15.03.2018).
中华人民共和国国务院令 第686号. URL: http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/content/2017-09/07/content_5223282.htm (дата обращения: 15.03.2018).
China passes new religious regulations ‘to prevent extremism’. URL: https://www.worldwatchmonitor.org/2017/09/china-passes-new-religious-regulations-preven t-extremism/ (дата обращения: 15.03.2018).
Конституция КНР 1982 года (ред. от 2004 года). Chinalaw.Center. URL: http:// http://chinalaw.center/constitutional_law/china_constitution_revised_2004_russian/ (дата обращения: 15.03.2018).
中华人民共和国民族区域自治法, принятый 31 мая 1984 года, вступивший в силу 1 октября 1984 года. URL: http://www.china.org.cn/ english/government/207138.htm (дата обращения: 15.03.2018).
The European Court of Human Rights. Judgment of 2 October 2014. Church of Scientology of St Petersburg and Others v. Russia, Application no. 47191/06. URL: http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-146703 (дата обращения: 15.03.2018).
The United States' Congressional-Executive Commission on China. Zhejiang Government Launches Demolition Campaign, Targets Christian Churches. URL: http://www.cecc.gov/publications/commission-analysis/zhejiang-government-launches-demolition- campaign-targets-christian (дата обращения: 15.03.2018).
Cross burns as officials attempt to remove it. URL: http://www.chinaaid. org/2017/09/cross-burns-as-officials-attempt-to.html (дата обращения: 15.03.2018).
Доклад о деятельности Уполномоченного по правам человека в Российской Федерации за 2016 год // Российская газета. 2017. № 7270 (104).
National Human Rights Action Plan of China (2016-2020). URL: http://english.gov.cn/archive/publications/2016/09/29/content_281475454482622.htm (дата обращения: 15.03.2018).
W. Cole Durham, Jr. Religious Freedom in a Worldwide Setting: Comparative Reflections // Pontificia Accademia delle scienze sociali. Plenary Session (17th: 2011: Vatican City).
 Freedom of religion in China and in Russia: modern legal framework and the system of state restrictions | Tomsk State University Journal of Law. 2018. № 28. DOI:  10.17223/22253513/28/4

Freedom of religion in China and in Russia: modern legal framework and the system of state restrictions | Tomsk State University Journal of Law. 2018. № 28. DOI: 10.17223/22253513/28/4

Download full-text version
Counter downloads: 600
Download file