Other measures of criminal character in the Russian Federation and the Republic of Korea | Tomsk State University Journal of Law. 2019. № 31. DOI: 10.17223/22253513/31/9

Other measures of criminal character in the Russian Federation and the Republic of Korea

A comparative legal study of the provisions of Russian and South Korean legislation on other measures of a criminal-law nature and an attempt is made to distinguish these measures and punishment on the basis of differences in their characteristics and content are made in the article. It is noted that the legislator in the Russian Federation and the Republic of Korea had different approach to the status of certain criminal legal measures (in particular, compulsory measures of medical nature and confiscation of property). Penalties and other measures of a criminal-law nature are criminal-legal measures and have a number of common features. Firstly, such measures are set in the General Part of the criminal law and, in the case of South Korean medical compulsory measures (compulsory treatment) and some other measures, in special laws. Secondly, they are measures of state compulsion and consist of certain deprivations and restrictions. Thirdly, these measures shall be imposed by the court on persons found guilty of committing acts prohibited by criminal law. Punishment also has two features that are not pertain to other measures of a criminal-law nature - it is set in the sanctions of the Special Part of the Criminal Law1 articles and entails a specific legal consequence (criminal record). Neither in Russian nor in South Korean legislation there is no definition of other measures of a criminal-law nature, as well as there is no closed list such measures. Russian legislator directly refers to other measures of a criminal-law nature compulsory measures of medical nature, confiscation of property and judicial fine, while others, which are «other» measures on all grounds (for example, probation), are considered in this context only in the doctrine of criminal law. The legislation of the Republic of Korea does not contain the term «other measures of a criminal-law nature» at all, and their conditional list, compiled in the result of an analysis of disparate norms of various laws, includes compulsory treatment, imprisonment in a workhouse and the performance of community service. Conditional sentence and some other measures may be included in this list also, however this article focuses on, first of all, comparison of Russian and South Korean legal provisions on the compulsory treatment of persons who committed an act forbidden by criminal law and the confiscation of property. In addition, the article examines the legislative regulation of the judicial fine, which was introduced in the Criminal Code in 2016 and has some specific similarities with the South Korean «other» measures used as a substitute for common fine. Other measures that may be considered as other measures of a criminal-law nature are mentioned in the research, but are not considered in detail.

Download file
Counter downloads: 163

Keywords

уголовная ответственность, наказание, иные меры уголовно-правового характера, criminal responsibility, punishment, other measures of a criminal-law nature

Authors

NameOrganizationE-mail
Minyazeva Tatyana F.Institute of Legislation and Comparative Law under the Government of the Russian Federation; Peoples' Friendship University of Russiaminyazeva2008@rambler.ru
Dobryakov Denis A.Peoples' Friendship University of Russiaden-dobryakov@yandex.ru
Всего: 2

References

Шеслер А.В. К вопросу о карательном характере уголовного наказания // Актуальные проблемы борьбы с преступностью: вопросы теории и практики : материалы XX междунар. науч.-практ. конф. Красноярск : Сиб. юрид. ин-т МВД России, 2017. С. 11-15.
Прозументов Л.М. Уголовная ответственность и стадии ее реализации // Актуальные проблемы борьбы с преступлениями и иными правонарушениями. 2018. № 16-2. С. 32-34.
Комментарий к Уголовному кодексу Российской Федерации (постатейный) / под ред. Г.А. Есакова. 6-е изд., перераб. и доп. М. : Проспект, 2015. 592 с.
Уголовно-правовое воздействие / под ред. А.И. Рарога. М. : Проспект, 2016. 288 с.
Комментарий к Уголовному кодексу Российской Федерации / под ред. Ю.И. Скуратова, В.М. Лебедева. 2-е изд., изм. и доп. М. : Норма: ИНФРА-М, 1998. 832 с.
Векленко С.В., Карпов К.Н. Конфискация имущества: противоречия законодательства // Вестник ВИ МВД России. 2010. № 1. С. 20-26.
Пащенко Е.А. Конфискация имущества: реалии и ожидания // Северо-Кавказский юридический вестник. 2015. № 4. С. 81-88.
Уткин В.А. Реформа системы уголовных наказаний как условие эффективности альтернативных санкций // Вестник Кузбасского института. 2011. № 1 (4). С. 6-8.
Пропостин А.А. Конфискация как имущественная мера криминологической безопасности // Вестник Томского государственного университета. 2010. № 331. С. 119-122.
Сыч К.А., Курлаева О.В. Конфискация имущества как предмет уголовно-правового исследования // Уголовно-исполнительное право. 2013. № 1. С. 69-72.
김혜경. 형법개정안상 공소제기 없는 몰수의 해석과 집행절차에 관한 연구 // 형사정책연구. 2015. 제26권, 제2호 (통권 제102호). 59-94면. [Ким Хве Кен. Толкование и исполнение конфискации имущества без обвинения в новой поправке к уголовному закону // Корейский криминологический обзор. 2015. № 26, т. 2 (102). С. 59-94].
조균석. 범죄수익몰수제도의 문제점과 개선방안 // 인권과정의. 9월, 2011. 통권제420호. 112-127면. [Чжо Хё Сок. Конфискация доходов от преступления // Права человека. 2011. Т. 420, сентябрь. С. 112-127].
정웅석. 유죄판결 없는 몰수제도 도입에 관한 연구 // 형사법의 신동향. 3월, 2015. 통권 제46호. 182-242면. [Чон Ун Сок. Исследование о введение конфискации имущества без обвинительного приговора суда // Новые тенденции уголовного права. 2015. Т. 46, март, С. 182-242].
 Other measures of criminal character in the Russian Federation and the Republic of Korea | Tomsk State University Journal of Law. 2019. № 31. DOI: 10.17223/22253513/31/9

Other measures of criminal character in the Russian Federation and the Republic of Korea | Tomsk State University Journal of Law. 2019. № 31. DOI: 10.17223/22253513/31/9

Download full-text version
Counter downloads: 1105
Download file