Unlawful annexation of territory of a state as the basis for its extinction | Tomsk State University Journal of Law. 2019. № 32. DOI: 10.17223/22253513/32/8

Unlawful annexation of territory of a state as the basis for its extinction

The scientific literature puts forward conflicting theoretical positions on the results of the illegal annexation of the entire state territory. According to the first, the annexed state continues to exist. According to the second said annexation leads to his death. In addition, the jurisprudence discussed the question becomes whether the state, illegally annexing the territory of another, over her sovereignty. Some experts answer it negatively, others - positively. The conflicting theoretical views expressed often lead to ambiguous assessments of situations involving the accession of some States to others. Thus, the entry of Latvia, Lithuania and Estonia into the USSR in 1940 gave rise to a discussion. According to some researchers and politicians, the Baltic countries continued to exist as independent States despite the said accession. Other experts believe that as a result of this incorporation it has become impossible to consider Latvia, Lithuania and Estonia as sovereign political entities. The article attempts to overcome these controversial issues. To achieve this goal, it solved the following tasks. First, based on the concept of legal positivism, the elements that are constitutive for any state organization are highlighted. We are talking about the sovereign and his subjects. Then it is shown that the annexation of the entire territory of the state eliminates the sovereign power of the latter. That is why the annexed state itself ceases to exist. Then the article reveals the concept of sovereignty of state power and its transformation in territorial changes. This analysis led to the following conclusion. Any transition of the territory of one state to another requires that the political leadership of the latter perform functions on it, the implementation of which is traditionally considered in law as the exercise of the sovereignty of state power. Thus, the annexation implies the transfer of sovereignty from the state power, which has lost the territory, to the state power, which has received it. Finally, the article assesses the judgment according to which Latvia, Lithuania and Estonia did not cease to exist after joining the USSR in 1940. As you know, as a result of this incorporation, the population of the Baltic countries ceased to obey the structures that represented the sovereign power of these States before the said incorporation. Sovereign powers on the territory of Latvia, Lithuania and Estonia began to perform the USSR. It is clear from this that the state power that existed in Latvia, Lithuania and Estonia before the accession under discussion ceased to be such after it. That is why these States themselves ceased to exist.

Download file
Counter downloads: 134

Keywords

аннексия, оккупация, суверенитет, незаконное применение силы, annexation, occupation, sovereignty, unlawful use of force

Authors

NameOrganizationE-mail
Tikhonravov Evgeny Y.Siberian Federal Universityetikhonravov@sfu-kras.ru
Всего: 1

References

Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law: Annexation. URL: http://opil.ouplaw.com/view/10.1093/law:epil/9780199231690/law-9780199231690-e1376
Shaw M. International Law. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 2008. 1542 p.
Crawford J. The Creation of States in International Law. Oxford : Oxford University Press, 2011. 870 p.
Langer R. Seizure of Territory: the Stimson Doctrine and Related Principles in Legal Theory and Diplomatic Practice. Princeton : Princeton University Press, 1947. 313 p.
Заседания Верховного Совета СССР шестого созыва. Шестая сессия : стенографический отчет. М. : Изд. Верховного Совета СССР, 1965. 360 с.
Marek K. Identity and Continuity of States in Public International Law. Geneva : Droz, 1968. 613 p.
Brownlie I. Principles of Public International Law. Oxford : Oxford University Press, 2003. 784 p.
Мялксоо Л. Советская аннексия и государственный континуитет: международно-правовой статус Эстонии, Латвии и Литвы в 1940-1991 гг. и после 1991 г. Тарту : Издательство Тартуского университета, 2005. 399 с.
Vitas R. The Recognition of Lithuania: the Completion of the Legal Circle // Journal of Baltic Studies. 1993. Vol. 24. Р. 247-262.
Kelsen H. General Theory of Law and State. New Jersey : Transaction Publishers, 2007. 516 p.
Scheuner U. Die Funktionsnachfolge und das Problem der staatsrechtlichen Konti-nuitaet // Vom Bonner Grundgesetz zur gesamtdeutschen Verfassung (Festschrift fuer Franz Nawiasky) / T. Maunz (Hg.). Muenchen : Isar Verlag, 1956. S. 9-48.
Aron R. Peace and War: a Theory of International Relations. New Jersey : Transaction Publishers, 2003. 820 p.
Емцов Г.Н. Государство и право в условиях гражданской войны : автореф. дис.. канд. юрид. наук. Красноярск, 2004. 17 c.
Austin J. Lectures on Jurisprudence or The Philosophy of Positive Law. London : John Murray, 1869. 1169 p.
Еллинек Г. Общее учение о государстве. СПб. : Юрид. центр Пресс, 2004. 752 c.
Easton D. Framework for Political Analysis. Chicago : Chicago University Press, 1979. 160 p.
Митин С.С. Государственная власть: понятие и закономерности организации: дис.. канд. юрид. наук. Красноярск, 2004. 181 c.
Короткова М.В. Политика США по непризнанию вхождения прибалтийских республик в состав СССР // 1945 год: формирование основ послевоенного мироустройства. Киров, 2015. C. 208-213.
Waldern S.J. Lithuania: The Impact of the Stimson Doctrine. Sandy Bay : Tasmania University Union Lithuanian Studies Society, 1993. 33 p.
 Unlawful annexation of territory of a state as the basis for its extinction | Tomsk State University Journal of Law. 2019. № 32. DOI: 10.17223/22253513/32/8

Unlawful annexation of territory of a state as the basis for its extinction | Tomsk State University Journal of Law. 2019. № 32. DOI: 10.17223/22253513/32/8

Download full-text version
Counter downloads: 1246
Download file