The principle of proportionality and fundamental principles of the constitutional system | Tomsk State University Journal of Law. 2020. № 36. DOI: 10.17223/22253513/36/6

The principle of proportionality and fundamental principles of the constitutional system

The work analyzes the place of the principle of proportionality in the system of the fundamental principles of Russia's constitutional system. Although proportionality is more often used for judicial control in the area of constitutional rights, this principle extends to other constitutional institutions. In the system of fundamental principles of the constitutional state, proportionality is placed on the top among the elements of legal statehood. In terms of proportionality, the foundations of the constitutional system are fundamental principles of constitutionalism aimed at ensuring moderation of public power. The unwritten nature of proportionality makes it recognized in the practice of constitutional justice as one element of the law-bound state. In a historical aspect, proportionality has been a constitutional prohibition of excessiveness. Being a response to the previous experience of despotism, this prohibition involves inadmissibility of arbitrary state intervention in the sphere of individual freedom. In this capacity, proportionality is based on liberal political ideology. However, besides this manifestation, conditioned by liberal ideology, because of the synthesis of the concept of the r law-bound and social state in the future, proportionality is expressed in the constitutional prohibition of insufficient state actions. Here, proportionality imposes positive obligations on the legislators in implementing measures to protect constitutional rights. The synthesis of the law-bound and social state involves a balancing of the main opposing ideologies. For example, this means that constitutional justice should establish an optimal balance between economic freedoms and social rights. Moreover, the later goal of social justice does not remove the original task of constitutionalism in preventing arbitrary interference of the authorities in the sphere of individual freedom. Understanding proportionality is impossible without taking into account the interconnectedness of the formal and material aspects of legal statehood. The formal aspect of a law-bound state is expressed in the idea of strict adherence by the public authority to the valid rules regardless of their content. The material aspect of a law-bound state is related to the inability to solve the problems of legal wrong (injustice of legislation) positively. In this regard, proportionality serves as a means of anti-formalism and requires a meaningful evaluation of legislative and other regulatory decisions affecting constitutional rights. From a procedural point of view, being an element of legal statehood, proportionality is more a guiding principle of the authorities and cannot defend individuals in court when they file a constitutional complaint. The principle of proportionality can serve as the bases for controlling the rules of legislative and other regulations when it is connected with the alleged violation of specific constitutional rights provided for by the second chapter of the Russian Constitution.

Download file
Counter downloads: 170

Keywords

принцип соразмерности, основы конституционного строя, правовое государство, the principle of proportionality, fundamental principles of the constitutional system, law-bound state

Authors

NameOrganizationE-mail
Dolzhikov Alexey V.Saint Petersburg State Universitya.dolzhikov@spbu.ru
Всего: 1

References

Фосскуле А. Принцип соразмерности / пер. с нем. А. Должикова // Сравнительное конституционное обозрение. 2015. №. 1. С. 159-163.
Рос. газ. 2020. 17 марта.
Арановский К.В., Князев С.Д. Правление права и правовое государство в соотношении знаков и значений. М. : Проспект, 2016. 208 с.
Barak A. Proportionality: constitutional rights and their limitations. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 2012. 611 p.
Дайси А.В. Основы государственного права Англии: введение в изучение английской конституции. СПб. : Изд. Л.Ф. Пантелеева, 1891. 707 c.
Jowell J. The Rule of Law and its Underlying Values // The Changing Constitution / ed. J. Jowell, D. Oliver. Oxford : Oxford University Press, 2011. P. 9-34.
Гаджиев Г.А. О судебной доктрине верховенства права // Сравнительное конституционное обозрение. 2013. № 4. С. 12-25.
Sobota von K. Das Prinzip Rechtsstaat: verfassungs- und verwaltungsrechtliche Aspekte. Tübingen : Mohr Siebeck, 1997. 569 S.
Beschluß des Ersten Senats vom 24.07.1957, 1 BvL 23/52 [Hamburgisches Hundesteu-ergesetz] // Entscheidungen des Bundesverfassungsgerichts. 1958. Bd. 7. S. 89.
Beschluß des Ersten Senats vom 05.03.1968, 1 BvR 579/67 [Zeugen Jehovas] // Entscheidungen des Bundesverfassungsgerichts. 1968. Bd. 23. S. 127.
Собрание законодательства РФ. 2002. № 6. Ст. 626.
Гаджиев Г. Принцип правовой определенности и роль судов в его обеспечении: качество законов с российской точки зрения // Сравнительное конституционное обозрение. 2012. № 4. С. 16-28.
Federal Constitution of the Swiss Confederation of 18 April 1999 (of 18 April 1999 (Status as of 1 January 2020)) // Der Bundesrat. URL: https://www.admin.ch/opc/en/ classi-fied-compilation/19995395/202001010000/101.pdf (accessed: 01.04.2020).
Beatty D.M. The ultimate rule of law. Oxford : Oxford University Press, 2004. 193 p.
Собрание законодательства РФ. 2001. № 29. Ст. 3059.
Доклад о верховенстве права от 4 апреля 2011 года : утв. Европейской комиссией за демократию через право (Венецианской комиссией) на 86-й пленарной сессии (Венеция, 25-26 марта 2011 года), CDL-AD(2011)003rev // Европейская комиссия за демократию через право. URL: https://www.venice.coe.int/webforms/documents/default. aspx?pdffile=CDL-AD(2011)003rev-rus (дата обращения: 01.04.2020).
Krauß von R. Der Grundsatz der Verhältnismäßigkeit. In seiner Bedeutung für die Notwendigkeit des Mittels im Verwaltungsrecht. Hamburg : Appel in Komm, 1955. 138 S.
Собрание законодательства РФ. 2011. No 27. Ст. 3991.
Grundgesetz für die Bundesrepublik Deutschland vom 23.05.1949 (zuletzt geändert vom 15. November 2019)] // Das Bundesministerium der Justiz und für Verbraucherschutz. URL: https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/gg/GG.pdf (das Datum des Zuganges: 01.12.2013)
Urteil des Ersten Senats vom 17.08.1956, 1 BvB 2/51 [KPD-Verbot] // Entscheidun-gen des Bundesverfassungsgerichts. 1956. Bd. 5. S. 85.
Постановление Конституционного Суда РФ от 17.12.1996 No 20-П // Собрание законодательстваРФ. 1997. No 1. Ст. 197.
Постановление Конституционного Суда РФ от 22.11.2017 г. No 31-П // Собрание законодательства РФ. 2017. No 49. Ст. 7529.
Dworkin R. A matter of principle. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1985. 425 p.
Собрание законодательства РФ. 1997. No 20. Ст. 2383.
Определение Конституционного Суда РФ от 01.11.2012 No 2008-О // Собрание законодательства РФ. 2012. No 51. Ст. 7325.
Silver and Others v. the United Kingdom (merits), 25.03.1983, § 90, Series A no. 61
Постановление Конституционного Суда РФ от 12.05.2011 No 7-П // Собрание законодательства РФ. 2011. No 22. Ст. 3237.
Постановление Конституционного Суда РФ от 26.11.2018 No 18-П // Собрание законодательства РФ. 2018. No 19. Ст. 2813.
Собрание законодательства РФ. 1994. No 13. Ст. 1447.
Вестник Конституционного Суда РФ. 2005. No 4
 The principle of proportionality and fundamental principles of the constitutional system | Tomsk State University Journal of Law. 2020. № 36. DOI: 10.17223/22253513/36/6

The principle of proportionality and fundamental principles of the constitutional system | Tomsk State University Journal of Law. 2020. № 36. DOI: 10.17223/22253513/36/6

Download full-text version
Counter downloads: 274
Download file