Actual problems of administrative procedures in business
Public administration in the sphere of entrepreneurship implies the development and implementation of organizational and legal mechanisms guaranteeing sustainability, transparency, security, control of such activities, and fulfillment of related obligations by economic entities. When carrying out business activities, a legal entity or an individual entrepreneur is a special subject of administrative and legal regulation. Not to assess the importance and role of administrative procedures in ensuring the implementation of business activities means to create an insurmountable barrier in the implementation of the entire market mechanism in the Russian Federation. A set of administrative and procedural proceedings, which include a variety of relatively independent administrative procedures, is of particular importance in the current conditions. The classification of administrative procedures is extremely diverse. It is possible to systematize the types of administrative procedures both by their purpose, subjects and participants and by the way problems are solved. These include such procedures as negotiation and conciliation, organizational, functional, control, coordination, democratic (social) and other ones. However, when applying such classifications we should remember that they often go beyond understanding administrative procedures as an element of positive management activities of the State and include, inter alia, internal procedures, procedures for the adoption of acts of administration, and protection procedures. Taking this into account, we prefer to focus on studying only the classification we have chosen, considering it more accurately reflects the content of administrative procedures. Administrative procedures have significant specifics concerning administrative liability procedures, monitoring and supervision procedures. This specificity must necessarily be taken into account both in theoretical developments and in the practical application of the knowledge, especially in the implementation of the concept of a single administrative process.
Keywords
административные процедуры,
административные процедуры в предпринимательской деятельности,
административные правонарушения,
административная ответственность,
administrative procedures,
administrative procedures in business activities,
administrative offences,
administrative responsibilityAuthors
| Starostin Sergey A. | Moscow State Law University named after O.E. Kutafin | prof.starostin@gmail.com |
Всего: 1
References
Wilson W. The Study of Administration // Political Science. 1887. Quarterly 2 June. URL: web.jjay.cuny. edu/~phara/W il sononAdmin. htm
Gaster L. Quality in Public Services. Buckingham : Open University Press, 1995. 65 p.
Keping Yu. Innovations and Excellence in Local Chinese Governance. Beijing : Dilban, 2002. URL: www.innovations.harvard.edu/china.html
Garsten C., De Montoya M.L. Transparency in a New Global Order: Unveiling Organizational Visions. Edward Elgar Publishing limited, 2008. 297 p.
Барциц И.Н. Приоритетные направления совершенствования административных процедур // Государство и право. 2008. № 3. С. 5-11.
Дегтярева Е.А. Административные процедуры : автореф. дис.. канд. юрид. наук : 12.00.14. Ростов н/Д, 2007. 26 с.
Sole P. Good Administration and administrative procedures. URL: https://www.repository. law.indiana.edu/ijgls/vol12/iss2/10/
Душакова Л.А. Административные процедуры в системе государственного регулирования предпринимательской деятельности // Бизнес в законе. 2013. № 6. С. 95-99.
Зубарев С.М. К вопросу о сущности контрольных процедур в государственном управлении // Вестник Университета имени О.Е. Кутафина (МГЮА). 2016. № 5. С. 118128.
Spicker P. Europe risks undermining public services. URL: www.publicservice europe.com/article/298/europe-risks-undermining-public-services
Сорокин В.Д. Административно-процессуальное право : eчебник. 2-е изд., перераб. и доп. / подг. А.И. Каплуновым. СПб. : Юрид. центр Пресс, 2008. 576с.
Cavallaro M.C. Garanzie della trasparenza amministrativa e tutela dei privati // Diritto amministrativo. 2015. № 1. P. 121-148.
Croley S.P. Theories of Regulation: Incorporating the Administrative Process. Colum. L. Rev. 1998. Vol. 98. URL: https://ssrn.com/abstract=11407
Galetta D.U. La trasparenza, per un nuovo rapporto tra cittadino e Pubblica Amministrazione: un’analisi storico-evolutiva, in una prospettiva di diritto comparato ed europeo // Rivista italiana di diritto pubblico comunitario. 2016. № 5. P. 121-134.
Давыдов К.В. Административная процедура: стадии возбуждения и рассмотрения административного дела // Административное право и процесс. 2017. № 8. C. 13-18.
Moore M. Break-through innovations and continuous improvement: Two different models of innovative processes in the public sector // Public Money and Management. 2005. № 25. P. 43-50.
Lynn L. Innovation and the public interest: insights from the private sector // Innovation in American government / A. Altchuler, R. Behn (eds.). Washington, DC : Brookings Institution, 1997. 130 p.
Разрешительная система в Российской Федерации : науч.-практ. пособие / под ред. А.Ф. Ноздрачева. М. : ИНФРА-М, 2015. 32 с.
Валяев Ю.К. Метод административных разрешений в механизме административно-правового регулирования // Вестник Московского университета МВД России. 2009. № 2. С. 181-184.
Савостин А.А. Аккредитация как метод административно-правового регулирования общественных отношений // Современное право. 2005. № 9. С. 34-36.
Спектор Е.И. Правовое регулирование режима аккредитации // Право и экономика. 2004. № 1. С. 3-11.
Купреев С.С. Аккредитация как современный метод административноправового воздействия // Административное право и процесс. 2013. № 5. С. 28-30.
Light P. Sustaining Innovation: Creating Non-profit and Government Organizations that Innovate Naturally. San Francisco : Jossey-Bass, 1998. 336 p.
Pollitt C., Bouckaert G. Public Management Reform: a Comparative Analysis. Oxford : Oxford University Press, 2000. 185 p.
Административная реформа в России : науч.-практ. пособие / под ред. С.Е. Нарышкина, Т.Я. Хабриевой. М., 2006. 57с.
Ведяшкин С.В. Административные процедуры охранительной направленности // Вестник Томского государственного университета. 2017. № 422. С. 206-210.
