Exclusive rights to the gene engineering's results: Russian and foreign experience | Tomsk State University Journal of Law. 2021. № 39. DOI: 10.17223/22253513/39/14

Exclusive rights to the gene engineering's results: Russian and foreign experience

Well-balanced patent regulation is an important factor in the effective development of the biotechnology market. The possibility of establishing exclusive rights over the results of genetic research, including isolated genes and gene-based diagnostics, has been the subject of heated debate all over the world. Nevertheless, a unified approach to regulating these matters has not yet emerged. For example, in the US and India, patenting of isolated natural genes and diagnostic methods based on them is not permitted at all. Only synthetic genes and modified sequences are patentable. The EU and the UK generally allow such objects to be patented, but impose additional requirements. In China, diagnostic methods are generally not considered to be patentable, yet particular substances and instruments used for diagnosis may be recognised as protectable subjects. A cautious approach to the admissibility of patent protection for the results of genetic research is reflected, for example, in the requirement to provide additional data in order to prove that the solutions do meet the criteria of industrial applicability and non-obviousness. In countries which allow the patenting of a gene sequence (or a partial gene sequence with the structure identical to that of a naturally occurring one) as a substance, the law nevertheless mandates that the industrial application of such a sequence must be clearly indicated; it is also required that the patent application contains the information on the field for which the industrial application is specifically described. An unambiguous approach to biotechnology patenting has not yet emerged in the Russian legal sphere. Russian Civil Code does not directly prohibit the patenting of genes, gene-based therapies and diagnostics. Basic principles and approaches to the patenting of genetic engineering results and the protection of exclusive rights to them, including: the criteria for distinguishing patentable and unpatentable results of genetic research, the limits of exclusive rights and the conditions for a compulsory license issuance have not yet been fully developed and introduced into the Russian legal framework and regulatory enforcement practice. The regulation is carried out at the level of by-laws: in accordance with the Rospatent Guidelines for Examination of Applications for Inventions, the approach used in the assessment of inventions relating to the field of biotechnology is the same as the one employed for inventions relating to other fields of science and technology. Given the potential importance of the biotechnology for the further progress in science and technology, these matters should be regulated at the Civil Code level. We propose that a broad public debate be held concerning 1) the principles for the regulation of these matters 2) the possibility of patenting, and 3) the extent of the exclusive rights of rightholders.

Download file
Counter downloads: 62

Keywords

intellectual property, exclusive rights, patents, genome, genetic research

Authors

NameOrganizationE-mail
Novoselova Ludmila A.Moscow State Law University named after O.E. Kutafinla-novosiolova@yandex.ru
Vorozhevich Arina S.Moscow State Universityarinavorozhevich@yandex.ru
Всего: 2

References

Public Hearing on Genetic Diagnostic Testing Alexandria, VA : United States Patent and Trademark Office, 2012. P. 195. URL: https://www.uspto.gov/sites/default/files/ aia_implementation/120216-genetic_transcript.pdf
Lee M.K. Interim guidance on patent subject matter eligibility // U.S. Patent Office, 2014. URL: https://www.bitlaw.com/source/pto/uspto-guidance-section-101.html
Sterckx S. Some Ethically Problematic Aspects of the Proposal for a Directive on the Legal Protection of Biotechnological Inventions // European Intellectual Property Review. 1998. Vol. 20, № 4. P. 123-128. URL: https://repository.library.georgetown.edu/handle/ 10822/533047
Парфенчик О.С. Директива о правовой охране биотехнологических изобретений: анализ основных противоречий // Международное частное право. 2011. № 4. С. 25-31. URL: http://elib.bsu.by/bitstream/123456789/17334/1/2011_4_JILIR_parfenchyk.pdf
Gold E.R., Carbone J. Myriad Genetics: in the eye of the policy storm // Genet Med. 2010. Vol. 20, № 4. P. 39-70. URL: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3037261/
Love J.P. Recent examples of the use of compulsory licenses on patents // Knowledge Ecology International. 2007. № 2. P. 1-19. URL: https://www.keionline.org/misc-docs/recent_cls_8mar07.pdf
Van Zimmeren E.G.H.M., Van Overwalle G. A paper tiger? Compulsory license regimes for public health in Europe // International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law. 2011. Vol. 42, № 1. P. 1-37 URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/ 228265672_A_Paper_Tiger_Compulsory_License_Regimes_for_Public_Health_in_Europe
Cook-Deegan R., DeRienzo C., Carbone J. et al. Impact of Gene Patents and Licensing Practices on Access to Genetic Testing for Inherited Susceptibility to Cancer: Comparing Breast and Ovarian Cancers to Colon Cancers // Genet Med. 2010. Vol. 12, № 4. P. 15-37. URL: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3047448/
Ravi B. Gene Patents in India: Gauging Policy by an Analysis of the Grants made by the Indian Patent Office // Journal of Intellectual Property Rights. 2013. Vol. 18, № 7. P. 323- 329. URL: http://nopr.niscair.res.in/bitstream/123456789/20283/1/JIPR%2018(4)%20323-329.pdf
Hawkins N. A red herring: invalidity of human gene sequence patents // European Intellectual Property Law Review. 2016. № 38 (2). P. 83-91.
Hawkins N. An exception to infringement for genetic testing - addressing patient access and divergence between law and practice // International review of industrial property and copyright law. 2012. № 43 (6) P. 641-661 URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/ 289195583_An_Exception_to_Infringement_for_Genetic_Testing_-_Addressing_Patient_ Access_and_Divergence_Between_Law_and_Practice
Roberson A. The Role of DNA Patents in Genetic Test Innovation and Access // Northwestern Journal of Technology and Intellectual Property. 2011. № 9. P. 377-399. URL: https://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1007&context=njtip
Park S. Gene Patents and the Public Interest: Litigating Association for Molecular Pathology v Myriad Genetics and Lessons Moving Forward // North Carolina Journal of Law & Technology. 2014. № 15 (4). P. 519-536. URL: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm? abstract_id=2464265
Cho M., Illangasekare S., Weaver M.A., Leonard D.G., Merz J.F. Effects of Patents and Licenses on the Provision of Clinical Genetic Testing Services // Journal of Molecular Diagnostics. 2003. № 5 (1). P. 3-8. URL: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/ PMC1907368/#:~:text=Fifty%2Dthree%20percent%20of%20respondents,a%20large%20num ber%20of%20laboratories
 Exclusive rights to the gene engineering's results: Russian and foreign experience | Tomsk State University Journal of Law. 2021. № 39. DOI: 10.17223/22253513/39/14

Exclusive rights to the gene engineering's results: Russian and foreign experience | Tomsk State University Journal of Law. 2021. № 39. DOI: 10.17223/22253513/39/14

Download full-text version
Counter downloads: 817
Download file