Fundamentals of the theory of pre-contractual liability | Tomsk State University Journal of Law. 2021. № 40. DOI: 10.17223/22253513/40/13

Fundamentals of the theory of pre-contractual liability

The article deals with the relatively new rules of Art. 434.1 the Civil Code of the Russian Federation on the conduct of negotiations. Taking into account the current wording of the said rule and the experience of foreign legislation on pre-contractual liability, the article argues for different theories justifying the nature of pre-contractual legal relations and liability and gives different positions of the authors on this issue. Proceeding from the doctrinal concept of obligation and characteristics of pre-contractual relations themselves the conclusion is made that these relations, firstly, are regulated by law and, secondly, they are not simply a legal relation but an obligation. It is based on certain actions of the negotiating partners that give rise to such an obligation. As such, any action that is sufficiently certain (in some cases it may be required by law) and expresses the intention of the person to regard himself as negotiating with the addressee, who will in return perform the same sufficiently certain action, can be regarded as such. The specified characteristics of an action allow us to conclude that, from the point of view of classification of legal facts, this action is an act (because it is performed with a certain intention evident to other participants of civil turnover) and, moreover, it is also a transaction. Special rules of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation stipulate that the actions performed to enter into negotiations (for example, if the conclusion of a contract is binding on one party) or the actions of both partners entail legal consequences - the obligation to negotiate in good faith. The analysis of these legal relationships identifies three stages in their development, characterises them and attempts to answer more precisely the question of who can be a participant in the negotiation process depending on the stage of the negotiation process. The subject matter of an obligation arising during pre-contractual contacts will be actions aimed at negotiating and concluding a contract. The content of the obligation arising in the course of pre-contractual contacts, based on Art. 434.1 of the Civil Code will be the obligation to negotiate in good faith (paragraph 2 of the above rule). Assuming that the legislator provides an indicative list of actions that should fall within the scope of bad faith conduct, an indicative list of the "standard" of good faith conduct at the negotiation stage is given. This includes the obligation to provide full and truthful information to a party, including the reporting of circumstances that, due to the nature of the contract, must be brought to the attention of the other party (e.g. in a sale, all encumbrances on the subject of the contract must be reported). In addition, persons are obliged to negotiate only if they intend to conclude a contract, not to terminate negotiations suddenly and unjustifiably, and to take into account the rights and legitimate interests of the other party to the negotiation. The obligation under this obligation may also include a requirement not to disclose information obtained during the negotiation of the contract.

Download file
Counter downloads: 23

Keywords

good faith principle, negotiation, pre-contractual legal relationship, pre-contractual obligation, pre-contractual liability

Authors

NameOrganizationE-mail
Demkina Alesya V.State Duma Committee on State Construction and Legislationale-demkina@ya.ru
Всего: 1

References

Яковлев В.Ф. О кодификации гражданского законодательства современной России // Основные проблемы частного права : сб. ст. к юбилею д-ра юрид. наук, проф. Александра Львовича Маковского / отв. ред. В.В. Витрянский, Е.А. Суханов. М. : Статут, 2010. С. 380-394.
Постановление Девятого арбитражного апелляционного суда от 15.102015 № 09АП-33403/2015-ГК по делу № А40-208031/14. URL: http://www.consultant.ru/cons/ cgi/online.cgi?req=doc&base=MARB&n=926641#06233387700789418
Хвощинский А. В поисках договора о переговорах // Бизнес-адвокат. 2000. № 1. URL: https://www.lawmix.ru/comm/7209
Разъяснения Верховного Суда РФ об ответственности за нарушение обязательств. 2016. URL: https://wiselawyer.ru/poleznoe/91832-razyasneniya-verkhovnogo-suda-otvetstvennosti-narushenie-obyazatelstv
Генкин Д.М. Право собственности как абсолютное субъективное право // Советское государство и право. 1958. № 6. С. 92-102.
Крашенинников Е.А., Байгушева Ю.В. Обязанности при ведении преддоговорных переговоров // Вестник ВАС РФ. 2013. № 6. С. 82-93.
Гницевич К.В. Преддоговорная ответственность в гражданском праве : дис.. канд. юрид. наук. СПб., 2009. 209 с.
Богданов В.В. Преддоговорные правоотношения в российском гражданском праве : автореф. дис.. канд. юрид. наук. М., 2011. 28 с.
Нерсесов Н.О. Представительство и ценные бумаги в гражданском праве. М. : Тип. Моск. ун-та, 1878. URL: https://base.garant.ru/3946654/
Лавров Д.Г. Денежные обязательства в российском гражданском праве. СПб. : Юрид. центр Пресс, 2001. 250 с.
Гражданское право : учебник : в 2 т. / отв. ред. Е.А. Суханов. М. : Волтерс Клу-вер, 2004. Т. 2, полутом 1. 702 с.
Покровский И.А. Основные проблемы гражданского права. М. : Статут, 1998. 353 с. (Классика российской цивилистики).
 Fundamentals of the theory of pre-contractual liability | Tomsk State University Journal of Law. 2021. № 40. DOI: 10.17223/22253513/40/13

Fundamentals of the theory of pre-contractual liability | Tomsk State University Journal of Law. 2021. № 40. DOI: 10.17223/22253513/40/13

Download full-text version
Counter downloads: 342
Download file