Notarial protection of the rights and legitimate interests of the parties in contracts requiring mandatory notarial form: prospects for development and problems of judicial practice | Tomsk State University Journal of Law. 2022. № 44. DOI: 10.17223/22253513/44/15

Notarial protection of the rights and legitimate interests of the parties in contracts requiring mandatory notarial form: prospects for development and problems of judicial practice

This study focuses on the analysis of contracts that require notarisation. The author focuses on the dynamics of the development of "cases" of compulsory notarisation of contracts established by Russian law. Of particular relevance is the analysis of foreign civil legislation stipulating the notarial compulsory form for civil law contracts. The author insists that the purpose of this kind of legislation is to ensure the effective protection of the rights and legitimate interests of civil parties. Of particular importance in this regard is the analysis of judicial practice in cases of invalidation of notarized contracts carried out in the study. To develop criteria (grounds, signs) which would allow the legislator to systematically include agreements into the category of mandatory notarization. It is also important to find incentives to exclude cases of judicial invalidation of notarized contracts. The research was carried out using the following methods: general scientific dialectic, universal scientific methods, as well as special legal methods, including comparative legal method, systemic interpretation and legal modelling. It has been proved that the cases of obligatory notarial authentication of contracts in the civil legislation should be based on their basic functions which determine the direction of influence on the participants of proprietary contracts. It was proposed to consider a special object, absence of counteroffer, proprietary law orientation, necessity of protection of family interests, as well as interests of debtor in agreements of security nature as criteria of obligatory notarial authentication of agreements. It has been established that the tendency in the development of civil legislation is an expansion of the list of contracts which require obligatory notarial authentication. It is offered to establish in the norms of notarial law property responsibility of notaries in case of invalidation of agreements certified by them in a judicial proceeding. It is possible to state that the goal of the publication has been reached. A system of criteria for including contracts into a category of obligatory notarial certification is proposed, and also the idea of civil liability of notaries in case of invalidation of contracts certified by them in a court order is formulated. The author declares no conflicts of interests.

Download file
Counter downloads: 23

Keywords

notary, contract, notarial form, invalidity of transaction, property liability

Authors

NameOrganizationE-mail
Schennikova Larisa V.Kuban State Universityshchennikova_larisa@mail.ru
Всего: 1

References

Бальзак О. де. Собрание сочинений : в 24 т. / пер. с фр. Т. 23. М. : Правда, 1960. 375 с.
Щенникова Л.В. О договорном праве, его перспективах и конструкции гражданско-правового договора // Законодательство. 2003. № 5. С. 18-21.
О внесении изменений в подразделы 4 и 5 раздела I части первой и статью 1153 части третьей Гражданского кодекса Российской Федерации: Федеральный закон от 07.05.2013 № 100-ФЗ // Собрание законодательства РФ. 2013. № 19. Ст. 2327.
Щенникова Л.В. О некоторых проблемах гражданского права: Теория. Законодательство. Правоприменение. Краснодар, 2010. 236 с.
Гражданский кодекс Испании : аннотированный перевод / пер. на рус. яз., обработка и комм. Д.В. Шорникова. Иркутск : Иркут. гос. ун-т, 2015. 335 с.
Гражданский кодекс Республики Узбекистан. Часть первая. URL: https://lex.uz/docs/111181 (дата обращения: 18.12.2021).
Закон «О вещном праве» Эстонской Республики. URL: https://www.riigiteataja.ee/akt/12807782 (дата обращения: 18.12.2021).
Codigo Civil Brasileiro. URL: https://www.senado.leg.br/bdsf/bitstream/handle/id/70327/Codigo%20Civil%202%20ed.pdf (дата обращения: 18.12.2021).
Французский гражданский кодекс. URL: http://oceanlaw.ru/wp-content/uploads/ 2018/02/Фр.Кодекс-123.pdf (дата обращения: 18.12.2021).
Гражданский кодекс РСФСР (утв. ВС РСФСР 11.06.1964) // Ведомости Верховного Совета РСФСР. 1964. № 24. Ст. 407.
Закон «О семье» Эстонской Республики от 12.10.1994 г. URL: https://estonia.mid.ru (дата обращения: 18.12.2021).
Project - Civil Code of the Republic of Kosovo. URL: https://md.rks-gov.net (дата обращения: 18.12.2021).
Act on Land and Building Leases. URL: http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=1944&vm=&re=02 (дата обращения: 18.12.2021).
Закон «Об ипотеке» Испании от 15.03.2019 г. № 5/2019. URL: https://www.boe.es/buscar/doc.php?id=BOE-A-2019-3814 (дата обращения: 18.12.2021).
Гражданский кодекс Грузии от 26.06.1997 № 786 // Парламентские ведомости. 1997. № 31.
Гражданский кодекс Кыргызской Республики от 08.05.1996 г. № 15. URL: http://cbd.minjust.gov.kg/act/view/ru-ru/4 (дата обращения: 18.12.2021).
Civil Code (Part I, Part II, and Part III). URL: http://www.japane-selawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?printID=&id=2057&re=02&vm=02 (дата обращения: 18.12.2021).
Гражданский кодекс Республики Гондурас. URL: https://www.hse.ru/data/2020/07/14/1597451132/ГК%20Гондурас.pdf
Решение Спасского районного суда Пензинской области от 23.08.2016 г. по делу № 2-168/2016. URL: https://sudact.ru/regular/doc/njUDoPEY0Hrw/(дата обращения: 18.12.2021).
Определение Судебной коллегии по гражданским делам Верховного Суда РФ от 20.12.2016 № 5-КГ16-174. URL: http://www.consultant.ru/cons/cgi/online.cgi?req=doc&base=ARB&n=487322#IrVV2sSyUlDRWAd4 (дата обращения: 18.12.2021).
Обзор судебной практики Верховного Суда Российской Федерации № 4 (2020) (утв. Президиумом Верховного Суда РФ 23.12.2020) // Бюллетень Верховного Суда РФ. 2021. № 5.
 Notarial protection of the rights and legitimate interests of the parties in contracts requiring mandatory notarial form: prospects for development and problems of judicial practice | Tomsk State University Journal of Law. 2022. № 44. DOI: 10.17223/22253513/44/15

Notarial protection of the rights and legitimate interests of the parties in contracts requiring mandatory notarial form: prospects for development and problems of judicial practice | Tomsk State University Journal of Law. 2022. № 44. DOI: 10.17223/22253513/44/15

Download full-text version
Counter downloads: 221
Download file