The state responsibility in law enforcement against transnational terrorism crimes in Indonesia
Terrorist groups such as the East Indonesia Mujahideen, Jamaah Ansharut Daulah and Jamaah Ansharut carry the potential for transnational terrorism in Indonesia as they are affiliated with international terrorist networks, such as ISIS (Islamic State of Iraq and as-Sham), Al Qaeda, or the Taliban. For this reason, Indonesia is one of the countries in Southeast Asia targeted by terrorist attacks. As a result, in the eyes of the international community, the terrorism movement in Indonesia is increasingly dangerous and almost always linked to overseas radical Islam groups. Coupled with widespread use of websites for terrorism propaganda, the crime of terrorism is not merely intranational but a transnational terrorism crime that is crossborder, becoming a global threat to humanity with a tremendous impact on all aspects of people's lives around the world. In an effort to combat terrorism crimes, the Government of Indonesia has updated the Law on the Eradication of Criminal Acts of Terrorism, most recently with Law Number 5 of 2018 concerning Amendments to Law Number 15 of 2003 concerning Stipulation of Government Regulations in Lieu of Law Number 1 of 2002 concerning Eradication of Criminal Acts of Terrorism. The eradication of terrorism in the law is expected to become a legal instrument for law enforcement, as well as the implementation of state responsibility for the protection of state sovereignty and the human rights of citizens of the Republic of Indonesia.This study is aimed to analyze the state responsibility in law enforcement against transnational terrorism crimes. In that context, this study is normative juridical research using a statutory approach. This study specification is descriptive-analytical. The data collected were then analyzed in a qualitative normative manner. The results of this study show that in law enforcement against transnational terrorism crimes, the punishment focuses more on the theory of retaliation focusing on arrests, detentions and punishments of terrorists, not on the efforts to integrate retributive theory with relative theory with three main objectives of punishment, namely "preventive, deterrence, and reformative" based on the "rule of law" and "legality" principles. For this reason, in the state responsibility in law enforcement against transnational terrorism crimes, it is necessary to have legal harmonization between national and international laws to prevent the state from being predicated as a state of wrongful acts. The author declares no conflicts of interests.
Keywords
law enforcement,
state responsibility,
transnational terrorismAuthors
| Duarga Hendri | Padjadjaran University | hendriduarga29@gmail.com |
| Adolf Huala | Padjadjaran University | |
| Suseno Sigid | Padjadjaran University | |
| Perwira Indra | Padjadjaran University | |
Всего: 4
References
UNO. (2004). Reports of the Secretary General's High Level Panel on Threats, Challenges and Change. [Online] Available from: http://www.un.org/secureworld.
Scharf, M. & Newton, M. (2011) Terrorism and Crimes Against Humanity. In: Sadat, L. (ed.) Forging a Convention for Crimes against Humanity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 262-278. DOI: 10.Ш7/СБО97805П92Ш4Ш5.
Krisnawati, E. (2021) Serangan Peristiwa 9/11 WTC: Kronologi Serangan Teroris 11 September. [Online] Available from: https://tirto.id/sejarah-peristiwa-9-11-wtc-kronologi-serangan-teroris-11-september-gjjX.
Soeharto. (2007) Perlindungan Hak Tersangka, Terdakwa, dan Korban Tindak Pidana Terorisme dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia. Bandung: Bandung: Padjadjaran University. pp. 2-3.
Robertson, G. (2002) Kejahatan Terhadap Kemanusiaan; Perjuangan Untuk mewujudkan Keadilan Global. Jakarta: Komisi Nasional Hak Asasi Manusia.
Atmasasmita, R. (2002) Masalah Pengaturan Terorisme dan Perspektif Indonesia. Jakarta: Badan Pembinaan Hukum Nasional Departemen Kehakiman dan HAM RI.
Nala Nourma Nastiti et al. (2017) Tantangan Implementasi Kerjasama Anti- Terorisme Antara Indonesia Dan Australia Tahun 2007-2016. Jurnal Dinamika Global. 2(2). Desember.
Kompas.com (2016) Kaleidoskop 2016, Kilas Blik Bom, Thamrin. [Online] Available from: https://megapolitan.kompas.com/read/2016/12/16/07000081/kaleidoskop.2016.kilas.balik.bom.thamrin?page=all.
Jennings, R. (ed.) (2008) Oppenheims's International Law. 9th ed. London: Oxford Public International Law.
Williams, G. (1955) The Definition of Crime. Current Legal Problems. 8(1). p. 107.
The Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia. (2007) Academic Study of Terrorism Law.
Library of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia. (2007) NASKAH AKADEMIS: Undang-Undang. Terorisme. [Online] Available from: https://perpustakaan.mahkamahagung.go.id/assets/resource/ebook/Naskah%20Akademissupreme%20%20Undang-Undang%20Teroisme.pdf.
Atmasasmita, R. (2018) Rekonstruksi Asas Tiada Pidana Tanpa Kesalahan: Geen Straf Zonder Schuld. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Elliot, M.A. (1952) Crime in Modern Society. New York: Harper & Bros Publisher.
Utrecht, E. (1987) Hukum Pidana I. Surabaya: Pustaka Tinta Mas. p. 168.
Andrews, W.G. (1968) Constitutions and Constitutionalism. New Jersey: Van Nostrand Company. p. 12.
Shant, D. (1988) Konsep Penegakan Hukum. Yogyakarta: Liberty. p. 32.
Hartono. (1969) Apakah The Rule of Law Itu? Bandung: Alumni. p. 58.
Muladi & Arief. B.N. (1992) Bunga Rampai Hukum Pidana. Bandung: Penerbit Alumni. p. 1.
Adolf, H. (1991) Aspek-aspek Negara dalam Hukum Internasional. Jakarta: CV Rajawali. p. 203.
Wallace, R.M.M. (2002) International Law. 4th ed. London: Sweet&Maxwell. p. 175.
Lehnardt, C. (2007) Private Military Companies and State Responsibility.International Law and Justice Working Papers. New York: NYU Law School. p. 5.
UNO. (2001) Draft Articles on the Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts. ILC's 53 rd Session, Geneva.
Malanczuk, P. (1997) Akehurst's Modern Introduction to International Law. London: Routledge. p. 327.
Degan, V.D. (2008) Responsibility of States and Individuals for Genocide and other International Crimes. In: Buffard, I. et al. (eds) International Law Between Universalism and Fragmentation. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff.
Starke, J.G. (1997) Pengantar Hukum Internasional. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika. p. 16.
Crenshaw, M. (2020) Rethinking Transnational Terrorism an Integrated Approach. Washington DC: United States Institute of Peace. [Online] Available from: https://www.usip.org/sites/default/files/2020-02/pw_158.
Denning, D.E. (2000) Cyberterrorism. Testimony before the Special Oversight Panel on Terrorism Committee on Armed Services U.S. House of Representatives. Georgetown University. [Online] Available from: http://www.cs.georgetown.edu/~denning/infosec/cyberterror.htm.
Conway, M. (2003) Terrorism and IT: Cyberterrorism and Terrorist Organizations Online. [Online] Available from: http://doras.dcu.ie/502/1/terrorism_it_2003.pdf.
Arief, B.N. (1996) Bunga Rampai Kebijakan Hukum Pidana. Bandung: PT. Citra Adityabakti. p. 35.
Hamzah, A. (1993) Sistem Pidana dan Pemidanaan Indonesia, dari Retribusi ke Reformasi. Jakarta: Pradnya Paramita.
Sholehuddin, M. (2007) Sistem Sanksi dalam Hukum Pidana, Ide Dasar Double Track System dan Implementasinya. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada. p. 42.
Atmasasmita, R. (1995) Kapita Selekta Hukum Pidana dan Kriminologi. Bandung: Mandar Maju. p. 8.
Barnes Jr, W.L. (1999) Revenge on Utilitarianism: Renouncing A Comprehensive Economics Theory of Crime and Punishment. Indiana Law Journal. 74(1). pp. 627-651. [Online] Available from: https://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/ilj/vol74/iss2/5.
Fuller, L.L. (1969) The Morality of Law. New Haven: Yale University Press. p. 33.
Chazawi, A. (2005) Pelajaran Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Penerbit PT Raja Grafindo Persada. p. 82.
Schmid, A.P. (2018) Revisiting the Relationship between International Terrorism and Transnational Organised Crime 22 Years. [Online] Available from: https://icct.nl/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/ICCT-Schmid-International-Terrorism-Organised-Crime.
Garnasih, Y. (2006) Anti Pencucian Uang di Indonesia dan Kelemahan Implementasinya. Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia. 3(4). p. 135. [Online] Available from: http://library.stik-ptik.ac.id/file?file=digital/37263-Jli°/o20Vol.3-06-103.pdf.
Purnomo, B. (1994) Asas-asas Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia. p. 172.
