“Dictionary of the Russian Language of the 18th Century” as a tool for studying the individual authorial style | Voprosy leksikografii – Russian Journal of Lexicography. 2024. № 33. DOI: 10.17223/22274200/33/5

“Dictionary of the Russian Language of the 18th Century” as a tool for studying the individual authorial style

The article examines the problem of the connection between the authorial dictionary and the historical dictionary in the context of studying the language and style of writers. The material for the study is illustrations from the works of Feofan Prokopovich, presented in the academic Dictionary of the Russian Language of the 18th Century, which covers the processes of formation of lexical and grammatical norms of the Russian literary language of the corresponding time period. The importance of studying Feofan Prokopovich’s literary work in the context of linguistic evolution and the history of the formation of lexical and grammatical norms of the Russian literary language of the time is determined. In particular, the specificity of Feofan Prokopovich’s style and the lexical thesaurus of his works is of great importance for understanding linguistic trends and the development of the literary language in the Petrine era and the post-Petrine period. The research methods are lexicographic (analysis of dictionary data), diachronic (study of language changes over time), interpretive (analysis of the meanings and uses of words), and comparative (comparison of various linguistic elements and phenomena). The author also uses a methodology related to the study of the “Western Russian (written) language” and individual works in this language. In the course of the study, the following conclusions were obtained. Feofan Prokopovich used a variety of thematic groups in his writings, covering ancient mythology, religious themes, moral and ethical issues, science, art, military affairs and political geography. Such a variety of vocabulary reflects the important role of Prokopovich not only as a writer, theologian and politician, but also as a person who shapes the new civil discourse of his time and the artistic speech of the Baroque and pre-classical era. The author of the article made a significant contribution to solving the problem posed, using the academic Dictionary of the Russian Language of the 18th Century to analyze the lexical and stylistic palette of the works of Feofan Prokopovich. A detailed analysis of words belonging to various groups was carried out. The importance of the Old Slavonic lexical element in Prokopovich’s works was emphasized. New speech trends and elements that influenced his book and written style were identified. Particular attention was paid to the variety of figurative words and phraseological expressions Prokopovich used, based on specific examples from the historical dictionary. Further analysis will allow us to better understand the features of the terminology Feofan Prokopovich used, as well as the influence of various linguistic and cultural factors on his works, which requires content analysis of the texts created by the writer-reformer and the creation of Feofan Prokopovich’s authorial dictionary. The author declares no conflicts of interests.

Download file
Counter downloads: 4

Keywords

lexicography, historical dictionary, authorial dictionary, writer’s dictionary, lexical level of text, diachronic rhetoric

Authors

NameOrganizationE-mail
Patroeva Natal’ia V.Petrozavodsk State Universitynvpatr@list.ru
Всего: 1

References

Шестакова Л.Л. Русская авторская лексикография: Теория, история, современность. М.: Языки славянских культур, 2011. 464 с.
Гинзбург Е.Л. Альтернативы писательской лексикографии. II // Вестник МГУ. Сер. 19: Лингвистика и межкультурная коммуникация. 2000. № 2. С. 27-42.
Словарь церковнославянского и русского языка. СПб.: Тип. Императорской Академии наук, 1847. Т. I. 439 с.
Карский Е.Ф. Что такое древнее западнорусское наречие? // Труды Девятого археологического съезда в Вильне, 1893 / под ред. графини Уваровой и С.С. Слуцкого. Т. II. М., 1897. С. 62-70.
Житецкий П.И. Очерк литературной истории малорусского наречия в XVII и XVIII вв. Ч. 1. Киев: Тип. Г.Т. Корчак-Новицкого, 1889. 275 с.
Мозер М. Что такое "простая мова"? // Studia Slavica Hung. 2002. № 47/3-4. С. 221-260.
Moser M. Mittelruthenisch (Mittelweißrussisch und Mittelukrainisch): Ein Überblick // Studia Slavica Hung. 2005. № 50/1-2. S. 125-142.
Мойсиенко В.М. Этноязыковая принадлежность "руськой мовы" во времена Великого княжества Литовского и Речи Посполитой // Славяноведение. 2007. № 5. С. 45-64.
Смирнова Е.А. "Проста мова" // Русская речь. 2009. № 3. С. 75-79.
Владимиров П.В. Доктор Франциск Скорина. Его переводы, печатные издания и язык. СПб.: Типография Императорской Академии наук, 1888. 414 с. URL: https://archive.org/details/vladymyrov1888/page/n3/mode/2up.
Словарь русского языка XVIII века. Вып. 1-6. Л.: Наука. Ленингр. отд-е, 1984-1991; Вып. 7-19. СПб.: Наука. С.-Петерб. отд-е, 1992-2011. URL: http://feb-web.ru/feb/sl18/slov-abc/; Вып. 20-22. СПб.: Наука, 2013-2019.
Словарь русского языка XVIII века: Правила пользования словарем. Указатель источников / под общ. ред. Ю.С. Сорокина. Л.: Наука (Ленинградское отделение), 1984. 141 с.
Живов В.М. История языка русской письменности: в 2 т. М.: Русский фонд содействия образованию и науке, 2017. Т. 2. 480 с.
Успенский Б.А. Из истории русского литературного языка XVIII - начала XIX века. Языковая программа Карамзина и ее исторические корни. М.: Изд-во Моск. ун-та, 1985. 216 с.
Словарь Академии Российской. СПб.: Тип. Императорской Академии Наук, 1789-1794. Ч. 1-6.
Кантемир А. Собрание стихотворений. Л.: Советский писатель, 1956. 547 с.
Прокопович Ф. Сочинения / под ред. и с предисл. И.П. Еремина; Академия наук СССР. Институт русской литературы (Пушкинский дом). М.; Л.: Изд-во Академии наук СССР. Ленинградское отделение, 1961. С. 335-455.
Ломоносов М.В. Полн. собр. соч.: в 11 т. Т. 7: Труды по филологии. 1739-1758 / ред. В.В. Виноградов и др. М.; Л.: АН СССР, 1952. 993 с.
Сумароков А.П. О российском духовном красноречии // Полное собрание всех сочинений: В стихах и прозе / Покойнаго действительнаго статскаго советника, ордена св. Анны кавалера и Лейпцигскаго ученаго собрания члена, Александра Петровича Сумарокова. Собраны и изданы в удовольствие любителей российской учености Николаем Новиковым, членом Вольнаго Российскаго собрания при Имп. Московском университете. Ч. VI. М.: Университетская типография у Н. Новикова, 1781. С. 295-302.
 “Dictionary of the Russian Language of the 18th Century” as a tool for studying the individual authorial style | Voprosy leksikografii – Russian Journal of Lexicography. 2024. № 33. DOI: 10.17223/22274200/33/5

“Dictionary of the Russian Language of the 18th Century” as a tool for studying the individual authorial style | Voprosy leksikografii – Russian Journal of Lexicography. 2024. № 33. DOI: 10.17223/22274200/33/5

Download full-text version
Counter downloads: 157