Psycholinguistic database TurkWordPerception as a lexicographic source (assessments of the contribution of perception modalities to semantics) | Voprosy leksikografii – Russian Journal of Lexicography. 2022. № 26. DOI: 10.17223/22274200/26/5

Psycholinguistic database TurkWordPerception as a lexicographic source (assessments of the contribution of perception modalities to semantics)

This article presents TurkWordPerception (http://clingv.ru:3839/), a psycholinguistic database (PBD) on the assessment of 600 words of the Khakas and Tatar languages. The PBD was created within the framework of the project for studying the linguistic diversity of Southern Siberia. The article substantiates the theoretical foundations, data structure, methods of collecting the material. Using the descriptive statistical data based on the database materials, source studies capabilities of the PBD are assessed. When creating the database, the authors employed works in the field of the theory of embodied cognition, the study of linguistic relativity and the theory of the bilingual mental lexicon. The database includes assessments of 200 nouns, 200 adjectives, and 200 verbs for both Tatar and Khakas, which are translated equivalents of RuWordPerception data words. Information about the assessment of the relationship between the words of the two Turkic languages and the modalities of perception was collected using the questionnaire method based on the seven-point Likert scale. Data collection was carried out using paper questionnaires or in the experiment created in the PsychoPy software. Metadata about the respondents were also collected based on the sociolinguistic questionnaire and the language experience questionnaire. Currently, the database includes assessments of 600 words of the Tatar language in 5 modalities of perception, received from 75 respondents -142,225 assessments; 600 words of the Khakas language in 5 modalities of perception, received from 93 respondents - 188,370 assessments. The article uses descriptive statistics to monitor primary data sources, which are compared with similar RuWordPerception data. Speakers of the Tatar and Khakas languages give assessments of strong connection with all modalities of perception and of average connection - above 4. Tatar speakers give lower assessments in all modalities of perception compared to Khakas speakers (the significance level p=0.00 according to the Mann-Whitney test). Comparison of these data with assessments of Russian translated equivalents given by speakers of the Tatar and Khakas languages revealed a high degree of generality of the level of assessments given by representatives of the two language communities, with an inverse relationship: the Tatar give higher assessments of Russian translation equivalents compared to the Khakas. Evaluating the words of the Russian language, the speakers of Tatar and Khakas give lower assessments to them than to the words of their native languages. TurkWordPerception data can serve as a basis for conducting a multilateral analysis with the data obtained in world psycholinguistics on the material of other languages, and in general will contribute to the introduction of the Tatar and Khakas languages into the paradigm of psycholinguistic research. The authors declare no conflicts of interests.

Download file
Counter downloads: 48

Keywords

psycholinguistic databases, modalities of perception, Tatar language, Khakas language, questioning, Likert scale

Authors

NameOrganizationE-mail
Rezanova Zoya I.Tomsk State Universityrezanovazi@mail.ru
Vladimirova Valeria E.Tomsk State Universitypicture_perfect@mail.ru
Mashanlo Timur E.Tomsk State Universitymashanlote@gmail.com
Всего: 3

References

Мишанкина Н.А. Базы данных в лингвистических исследованиях // Вопросы лексикографии. 2013. № 1 (3).
Колбенева М.Г., Александров Ю.И. Органы чувств, эмоции и прилагательные русского языка: Лингво-психологический словарь. М. : Языки славянских культур, 2010. 369 с.
Balota D.A., Yap M.J., Cortese M.J., Hutchison K.A., Kessler B., Loftus B., Neely J.H., Nelson D.L., Simpson G.B., Treiman R. The English lexicon project: A user’s guide // Behav. Res. Methods. 2007. № 39. P. 445-459.
Yap M. J., Rickard Ferrand L., New B., Brysbaert M., Keuleers E., Bonin P., Meot A., Augustinova M., Pallier C. The French Lexicon Project: Lexical decision data for 38,840 French words and 38,840 pseudowords // Behav. Res. Methods. 2010. № 42. P. 488-496.
Liow S.J., Jalil S. B., & Faizal S. S.B. The Malay lexicon project: A database of lexical statistics for 9,592 words // Behav. Res. Methods. 2010. № 42. P. 992-1003.
StimulStat Project / Лингвистическая база данных для слов русского языка. URL: http://stimul.cognitivestudies.ru/ru_stimul (дата обращения: 06.10.2019).
Alexeeva S., Slioussar N., Chernova D. StimulStat: A lexical database for Russian // Behav. Res. Methods. 2018. № 50. P. 2305-2315. doi: 10.3758/s13428-017-0994-3
Keuleers E., Balota D.A. Megastudies, crowdsourcing, and large datasets in psy cholinguistics: An overview of recent developments // The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. 2015. № 68(8). P. 1457-1468. doi: 10.1080/ 17470218.2015.1051065
Word megastudy data available. URL: http://crr.ugent.be/programsdata/megastudy-data-available (дата обращения: 13.03.2022).
Miklashevsky A. Perceptual Experience Norms for 506 Russian Nouns: Modality Rating, Spatial Localization, Manipulability, Imageability and Other Variables // Journal of psycholinguistic research. 2018. Vol. 47. № 3. P. 641-661. doi: 10.1007/s10936-017-9548-1
Grigoriev A., Oshhepkov I. Objective age of acquisition norms for a set of 286 words in Russian: relationships with other psycholinguistic variables // Behav. Res. Methods. 2013. № 45 (4). P. 1208-1217. doi: 10.3758/s13428-013-0319-0. PMID: 23435657
Akinina Y., Malyutina S., Ivanova M., Iskra E., Mannova E., Dragoy O.Russian normative data for 375 action pictures and verbs // Behav. Res. Methods. 2015. № 47 (3). P. 69-707. doi:10.3758/s13428-014-0492-9
Резанова З.И., Миклашевский А.А. Моделирование образно-перцептивного компонента языковой семантики при помощи психолингвистической базы данных // Вестник Томского государственного университета. Филология. 2016. № 5 (43). С. 71-92. doi: 10.17223/19986645/43/6
Акинина Ю.С., Грабовская М.А., Вечкаева А.М., Игнатьев Г.А., Исаев Д.Ю., Ханова А.Ф. Библиотека психолингвистических стимулов: новые данные для русского и татарского языка // Седьмая международная конференция по когнитивной науке : тез. докл. Светлогорск, 20-24 июня 2016 г. М. : Ин-т психологии РАН, 2016. С. 93-95.
Психолингвистическая база данных RuWordReception. URL: http://clingv.ru:3839/ (дата обращения: 06.03.2022).
Резанова З.И., Машанло Т.Е., Степаненко А.А. Перцептивный компонент семантики существительных, прилагательных, глаголов русского языка в билингвальной перспективе (психолингвистическая база данных RuWordPerception) // Вестник Томского государственного университета. 2020. № 450. C. 49-57. doi: 10.17223/15617793/450/6
Barsalou L.W. Grounded cognition // Annu. Rev. Psychol. 2008. Vol. 59. P. 617-645. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093639
Barsalou L.W., Simmons W.K., Barbey A.K., Wilson C.D. Grounding conceptual knowledge in modality-specific systems // Trends in cognitive sciences. 2003. Vol. 7. № 2. P. 84-91. doi: 10.1016/S13646613(02)000293
Резанова З.И., Степаненко А.А. Перцептивный компонент семантики имен существительных в восприятии носителей русского языка как родного и тюркскорусских билингвов (на основе психолингвистической базы данных RuWordPerception) // Вестник Томского государственного университета. 2020. № 455. C. 32-40. doi: 10.17223/15617793/455/5
Pavlenko A. The Bilingual Mental Lexicon: Interdisciplinary Approaches. Bristol : Multilingual Matters, 2009. 272 p.
 Psycholinguistic database TurkWordPerception as a lexicographic source (assessments of the contribution of perception modalities to semantics) | Voprosy leksikografii – Russian Journal of Lexicography. 2022. № 26. DOI: 10.17223/22274200/26/5

Psycholinguistic database TurkWordPerception as a lexicographic source (assessments of the contribution of perception modalities to semantics) | Voprosy leksikografii – Russian Journal of Lexicography. 2022. № 26. DOI: 10.17223/22274200/26/5

Download full-text version
Counter downloads: 131