The review has to estimate objectively the scientific article and contain the comprehensive analysis of its scientific and methodical merits and demerits. The recommended volume of reviews - to 3,5 thousand signs (with gaps), approximately to 1,5 pages of the text of the Word 12 format a size.

The general requirements imposed to the review of the scientific article are given below.

The reviewer has to:

    To determine compliance of the material stated in article, to a magazine profile ("Open and remote education" publishing materials by problems of open and remote education, scientific and methodical, medical and psychological aspects of open and remote education, by new information and educational technologies).
    To estimate relevance of the contents of article: whether there corresponds level of the material stated in it to modern achievements of science and technology.
    To estimate the importance of the received results of researches (scientific, practical).
    To specify, requirements to registration of a material of article are how considered: compliance of volume of article, summary existence in the Russian and English languages, existence of the list of references and links to it in the text, etc.
    To give article assessment from the methodical point of view and to define, whether it meets the requirements of teaching of this discipline.
    To give a quality and/or quantitative standard of the given in article actual and illustrative material.
    To estimate completeness and reliability of provided data.
    To estimate correctness and accuracy used (or entered) definitions and formulations.
    To give an assessment of literary style of a statement of a material.
    To give valid conclusions about article as a whole, remarks, if necessary - recommendations about its improvement.

The complex of the listed questions has the general character. Each concrete article demands an individual approach to a choice of criteria for its assessment.

In final part of the review by results of the analysis of article the accurate recommendation about its publication in the presented look, or about need of its completion or processing (with constructive remarks) or maybe about inexpediency of its edition in this magazine has to be made.