Blending (data for a linguistic terminological dictionary). Part 1. The broad and the narrow interpretation of blending | Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Filologiya – Tomsk State University Journal of Philology. 2015. № 2 (34).

Blending (data for a linguistic terminological dictionary). Part 1. The broad and the narrow interpretation of blending

According to modern Russian linguists' definition, blending is an interaction of language units or their parts with semantic, structural, associative or functional affinity. The interaction results in the semantic or formal transformation of language units and in the formation of a new word or an expression referred to as a blend. In modern Russian linguistics the term blending has various senses, one of which may be called a broad sense, another a narrow sense. The difference between the broad and the narrow senses of the term is in the number and quality of language units that may interact in blending, in the number of ways of their connection in blends and in reasons for blending. From the point of view of the narrow interpretation of blending, only two words, two set expressions, two morphological forms or paradigms, or two syntactic constructions can blend. Accordingly, there are four types of blending distinguished: lexical blending, phraseological blending, morphological blending and syntactic blending. According to the broad interpretation of blending, but for the two-member constructs other units are able to blend, e.g., phonemes when forming affricates, morphemes in word formation. Emergence of participles and other syncretic grammatical classes of words and many cases of non-standard word order are also considered a result of blending in the broad sense. From the point of view of the narrow interpretation of blending there are two ways of connecting language units or their parts: overlap and clipping. In the latter case interchanging of the parts of two language units takes a place (biology + electronics = bionics, modulator + demodulator = modem). The structural scheme of clipping is ^b + AB = аВ, or АЬ, or Аа]. In Russian, four types of clipping are possible: lexical, phraseological, morphological and syntactic. Overlap is possible when two language units have one or several identical elements [А = a or А = b, etc.] (INNUendo + INsiNUation= INsiNUendo). In Russian, lexical, phraseological, morphological and syntactic clipping, as well as single and plural clipping, is possible. According to the broad interpretation of blending, there are other ways of blending language units or their parts but for overlap and clipping, e.g., insertion ^b + AB = аАВЦ and addition ^b + AB = аbAВ]. Blends may develop from an unconscious misspeaking, for stylistic purposes, as a result of historical changes in language. From the point of view of the broad interpretation blending may be a result of the wrong popular etymology.

Download file
Counter downloads: 410

Keywords

заимодействие языковых единиц, контаминант, скрещивание языковых единиц, одноместное наложение, многоместное наложение, interaction of language units, blend, clipping of language units, single overlap, plural overlap

Authors

NameOrganizationE-mail
Efanova Larisa G.Tomsk Polytechnic Universityefanova@sibmail.com
Всего: 1

References

Земская Е.А. Словообразование // Современный русский язык: учеб. для высш. учеб. заведений. М., 1999. С. 284-441.
Лаврова Н.А. Англо-русский словарь: Современные тенденции в словообразовании. Контаминанты. М.: Флинта : Наука, 2009. 208 с.
Ronneberger-Sibold E. Lexical Blends: Functionally Tuning the Transparency of Complex Words // Folia Linguistica. July 2006. Vol. 40, № 1-2. Berlin. Р. 155-181.
Ахманова О.С. Словарь лингвистических терминов. М.: Сов. энцикл., 1969. 608 с.
Бельчиков Ю.А. Контаминация // Лингвистический энциклопедический словарь. М., 1990. С. 238.
Силина В.Б. Контаминация // Русский язык: энцикл. М., 1997. С. 197-198.
Матвеева Т.В. Полный словарь лингвистических терминов. Ростов н/Д: Феникс, 2010. 562 с.
Пекарская И.В. Контаминация // Культура русской речи: энцикл. слов.-справ. М., 2007. С. 269-272.
Сковородников А. П. Контаминация словообразовательная // Культура русской речи: эн-цикл. слов.-справ. М., 2007. С. 272-274.
Esper E.A. Analogy and Association in linguistics and psychology. Athens: University of Georgia, 1973. 356 p.
Квятковский А.П. Поэтический словарь / науч. ред. И. Роднянская. М.: Сов. энцикл., 1966. 376 с.
Щепин А.Г. О лексической контаминации // Русская речь. 1978. № 5. С. 66-69.
Ройзензон Л.И., Абрамец И.В. О фразеологической контаминации в русском языке // Русский язык в школе. 1969. № 3. С. 104-107.
Пауль Г. Принципы истории языка. М.: Изд-во иностр. лит., 1960. 502 с.
Шведова Н.Ю. Активные процессы в современном русском синтаксисе (словосочетание). М.: Просвещение, 1966. 155 с.
Ицкович В.А., Шварцкопф Б.С. О контаминации и смежных с нею явлениях // Памяти В.В. Виноградова: сб. ст. М., 1971. С. 90-96.
Розенталь Д.Э., Теленкова М.А. Словарь-справочник лингвистических терминов. М.: Просвещение, 1985. 400 с.
Журавлев А.Ф. Технические возможности русского языка в области предметной номинации // Способы номинации в современном русском языке. М., 1982. С. 45-109.
Ефанова Л.Г. Фразеологические трансформации в аспекте системных особенностей лексики и фразеологии // Сиб. филол. журн. 2006. № 3. С. 77-86.
Санников В.З. Русский язык в зеркале языковой игры. М.: Языки славянской культуры, 2002. 552 с.
Земская Е. А., Китайгородская М. В., Ширяев Е. Н. Русская разговорная речь: Общие вопросы. Словообразование. Синтаксис. М.: Наука, 1981. 278 с.
 Blending (data for a linguistic terminological dictionary). Part 1. The broad and the narrow interpretation of blending | Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Filologiya – Tomsk State University Journal of Philology. 2015. № 2 (34).

Blending (data for a linguistic terminological dictionary). Part 1. The broad and the narrow interpretation of blending | Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Filologiya – Tomsk State University Journal of Philology. 2015. № 2 (34).

Download full-text version
Counter downloads: 3939