Usage of different types of dictionaries in communicative stylisticsresearches

The article emphasizes the significance of lexicographic editions of different types in the Russianlanguage science. A special significance of Tomsk Linguistic School by O.I. Blinova in research ofinformative and source studies capabilities of dictionaries for the preservation of Russian speech cultureand researches of textual activity are mentioned in the article.Within the text centric school of modern Russian language science a brief characteristics ofcommunicative stylistics of text and its 3 main trends are given: the theory of textual associates, thetheory of text regulativeness and semantic expansion. Idiostyle is regarded in the communicativeaspect from the position of the way the author organizes the dialogue with the reader and languagemeans s/he uses.According to the methods of author's idiostyle research accepted in communicative stylistics aphased usage of lexicographic editions of different types is substantiated. It is reasonable to use thesaurusduring the collection of material and compiling of dictionary files of authors' word usages forresearch of their poetic lexicon features.The next stage after systematisation of lexical means, which had been used in the text, and afterthe analysis of different regulative structures, in which they had been united, it is reasonable to use acombinatory dictionary, synonyms and antonyms dictionaries of the Russian language, a dictionary ofimage-bearing means, an epithet dictionary in order to find out peculiarities of textual syntagmaticsand paradigmatics in author's works in comparison with usage.On the stage of modelling of textual associative fields of key words and concepts, which are regardedas possible stimuli of associative reader's activity, the usage of associative dictionaries is substantiated.A comparison with them allows concluding about the originality/stereotype of author'sassociations and peculiarities of cognitive reader's activity by textual means.The further modelling of textual associative-cognitive fields of key nominative words of conceptsmakes possible to imagine visually the character of inside textual connections of lexical units,which are united conceptually. Studying further cooperation of these fields (intersection, inclusion,contrast, overlapping, addition), it is possible to interpret a common text's meaning on the objectivepsycholinguistic basis. This procedure is significant even for identification of author's individuality(comparing associative field of key word in usage with textual one on the basis of its modelling wecan conclude about the degree of its uniqueness and their connection with standard).On the stage of concretisation of the concept sphere verbalized in the author's texts it is useful torely on the dictionaries of Russian culture, dictionaries of image-bearing means and images paradigms.For comparative purposes significance of different types of authors' dictionaries in order tofind out standard and individual peculiarities of the author is substantiated.

Keywords

Authors

References