The influence of the grammatical gender on the conceptualisation of objects (an experimental study)
The article investigates the influence of the grammatical gender on the conceptualisation of objects by native speakers and bilinguals. The research is carried out in the theoretical framework of the linguistic relativity hypothesis. This hypothesis is presently in the focus of vigorous scientific discussions by the representatives of different scientific fields, and it attracts a lot of research implementing both linguistic and psycholinguistic methods. The subject of the experimental psycholinguistic research is the grammatical category of gender in Russian and Spanish languages. Nowadays many papers implement psycholinguistic methods in the investigation of the grammatical gender. However, almost no research is done on the material of the Russian language. The authors conducted two experiments to test the hypothesis that the differences in the grammatical categorisation of nouns in Russian and Spanish languages would influence the perception of objects by the native speakers of these languages and bilinguals. The method the authors used partially derived from the paper by L. Boroditsky and W. Philips (Phillips W., Boroditsky L. "Can Quirks of Grammar Affect the Way You Think?"). The respondents saw paired pictures of men and women and objects on the screen, and their task was to rate the similarity of these pictures on the scale from 1 to 7. The participants were Russian native speakers who did not speak foreign languages except for English that lacks grammatical gender and late functional Russian-Spanish bilinguals. The results of the experiments demonstrated the influence of the grammatical gender in the Russian language on the perception of objects by native speakers who indeed perceived objects denoted by the nouns of masculine gender as more similar to men than to women. In the first experiment the authors used nouns of the opposite grammatical gender in Russian and Spanish, and bilinguals' responses did not show any difference in ratings of congruent (like a woman - a book that are both feminine in Russian) and non-congruent (like a man - a book, where man is masculine and book is feminine in Russian) pairs. In the second experiment the authors used nouns of the corresponding grammatical gender in Russian and Spanish, and bilinguals rated congruent pairs as much more similar than non-congruent. These results prove that bilinguals' perception is influenced by both their first and second languages. The experiments that the authors conducted confirmed the hypothesis that the differences in the grammatical categorisation of nouns in Russian and Spanish languages influence the perception of objects by the native speakers of these languages and bilinguals. The present study contributes to the linguistic relativity hypothesis and enriches its material and methodology.
Keywords
грамматический род,
лингвистическая относительность,
концептуализация,
билингвизм,
русский язык,
испанский язык,
grammatical gender,
linguistic relativity,
conceptualisation,
bilingualism,
Russian language,
Spanish languageAuthors
Rezanova Zoya I. | Tomsk State University; Tomsk Polytechnic University | resso@rambler.ru; resso@mail.tsu.ru |
Ershova Elizaveta Yu. | Tomsk State University | li-veta@list.ru |
Всего: 2
References
Нагель О.В. Деривационная специфика наименований лица в славянских языках (на материале параллельного подкорпуса НКРЯ) // Русин. 2015. №3 (41). С. 226-241.
Резанова З.И. Субъективные образы времени в современных славянских языках: диминутивные модели // Сибирский филологический журнал. 2017. № 3. C. 161-173.
Логический анализ языка: Язык и время / отв. ред. Н.Д. Арутюнова, Т.Е. Янко. М.: Индрик, 1997. 351 с.
Логический анализ языка: Языки пространств / отв. ред.: Н.Д. Арутюнова, И.Б. Левонтина. М.: Языки русской культуры, 2000. 448 с.
Картины русского мира: пространственные модели в языке и тексте / отв. ред. З.И. Резанова. Томск: UFO-Plus, 2007. 384 с.
Оглезнев В.В., Суровцев В.А. Правила, юридический язык и речевые акты // Schole. Философское антиковедение и классическая традиция. 2014. Т. 8, вып. 2. С. 293-302.
Найман Е.А. Социолингвистические аспекты философской риторики киников // Schole. Философское антиковедение и классическая традиция. 2016. Т. 10, вып. 2. С. 550-558.
Levinson S.C. Language and space // Annual review of Anthropology. 1996. Т. 25, №. 1. С. 353-382.
Boroditsky L. Does language shape thought?: Mandarin and English speakers' conceptions of time // Cognitive psychology. 2001. Т. 43, №. 1. С. 1-22.
Boroditsky L. Metaphoric structuring: Understanding time through spatial metaphors // Cognition. 2000. Т. 75, №. 1. С. 1-28.
Winawer J. et al. Russian blues reveal effects of language on color discrimination // Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2007. Т. 104, №. 19. С. 7780-7785.
Casasanto D. et al. How deep are effects of language on thought? Time estimation in speakers of English, Indonesian, Greek, and Spanish // Proceedings of the Cognitive Science Society. 2004. Т. 26. №. 26.
Majid A. et al. Can language restructure cognition? The case for space // Trends in cognitive sciences. 2004. Т. 8, №. 3. С. 108-114.
Nunez R.E., Sweetser E. With the future behind them: Convergent evidence from Aymara language and gesture in the crosslinguistic comparison of spatial construals of time // Cognitive science. 2006. Т. 30, №. 3. С. 401-450.
Gilbert A.L. et al. Whorf hypothesis is supported in the right visual field but not the left // Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2006. Т. 103, №. 2. С. 489-494.
Boroditsky L., Schmidt L.A., Phillips W. Sex, syntax, and semantics // Language in mind: Advances in the study of language and thought. 2003. С. 61-79.
Flaherty M. The influence of a language gender system on perception // Tohoku psychologica folia. 2000. Т. 58, С. 1-10.
Kurinski E., Jambor E., Sera M.D. Spanish grammatical gender: Its effects on categorization in native Hungarian speakers // International Journal of Bilingualism. 2016. Т. 20, №. 1. С. 76-93.
Landor R. Grammatical Categories and Cognition across Five Languages: The Case of Grammatical Gender and its Potential Effects on the Conceptualisation of Objects: Thesis (PhD Doctorate). - Griffith University, Brisbane, 2014. 310 с.
Nicoladis E., Da Costa N., Foursha-Stevenson C. Discourse relativity in Russian-English bilingual preschoolers' classification of objects by gender // International Journal of Bilingualism. 2016. Т. 20, №. 1. С. 17-29.
Andonova E. et al. Second language gender system affects first language gender classification // Cognitive aspects of bilingualism. Springer Netherlands, 2007. С. 271-299.
Janyan A., Vergilova Y. Biological sex context influences grammatical gender categorization of objects // European Perspectives on Cognitive Science. Sofia, 2011.
Резанова З.И., Некрасова Е.Д. Влияние грамматической категории рода на бимодальное восприятие имен существительных болгарского языка // Русин. 2015. №3 (41). С. 241-255.
Mills A.E. Acquisition of the natural-gender rule in English and German // Linguistics. 1986. Т. 24, №. 1. С. 31-46.
Ramos S., Roberson D. What constrains grammatical gender effects on semantic judgements? Evidence from Portuguese // Journal of Cognitive Psychology. 2011. Т. 23, №. 1. С. 102-111.
Sera M.D. et al. When language affects cognition and when it does not: An analysis of grammatical gender and classification // Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. 2002. Т. 131, №. 3. С. 377.
Guiora A.Z., Sagi A. A cross - cultural study of symbolic meaning-developmental aspects // Language Learning. 1978. Т. 28, №. 2. С. 381-386.
Clarke M.A. et al. Gender perception in Arabic and English // Language Learning. 1981. Т. 31, №. 1. С. 159-169.
Bassetti B.A.L. Is grammatical gender considered arbitrary or semantically motivated? Evidence from young adult monolinguals, second language learners, and early bilinguals // British Journal of Psychology. 2014. Т. 105, №. 2. С. 273-294.
Koch S.C., Zimmermann F., Garcia-Retamero R. El soldie Sonne // Psychologische Rundschau. 2007. Т. 58, №. 3. С. 171-182.
Ervin S.M. The connotations of gender // Word. 1962. Т. 18, №. 1-3. С. 249-261.
Bassetti B., Nicoladis E. Research on grammatical gender and thought in early and emergent bilinguals // International Journal of Bilingualism. 2016. Vol. 20. Iss 1. 3-16.
Bassetti B. 16 The grammatical and conceptual gender of animals in second language users // Language and bilingual cognition. 2010. С. 357.
Flaherty M. How a language gender system creeps into perception // Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology. 2001. Т. 32, №. 1. С. 18-31.
Konishi T. The semantics of grammatical gender: A cross-cultural study // Journal of psycho-linguistic research. 1993. Т. 22, №. 5. С. 519-534.
Konishi T. The connotations of gender: A semantic differential study of German and Spanish // Word. 1994. Т. 45, №. 3. С. 317-327.
Vigliocco G. et al. Grammatical gender effects on cognition: implications for language learning and language use // Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. 2005. Т. 134, №. 4. С. 501.
Phillips W., Boroditsky L. Can quirks of grammar affect the way you think? Grammatical gender and object concepts // Proceedings of the 25th annual meeting of the Cognitive Science Society. Mahwah, NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2003. С. 928-933.
Cubelli R. et al. The effect of grammatical gender on object categorization // Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 2011. Т. 37, №. 2. С. 449-460.
Guiora A.Z. Language and concept formation: A cross-lingual analysis // Behavior Science Research. 1983. Т. 18, №. 3. С. 228-256.
Rigalleau F., Caplan D. Effects of gender marking in pronominal coindexation // The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Section A. 2000. Т. 53, №. 1. С. 23-52.
Ширин А.Г. Билингвизм: поиск подходов к исследованию в отечественной и зарубежной науке // Вестн. Новгород. гос. ун-та им. Ярослава Мудрого. 2006. №. 36.
Nagel O.V. et al. Functional bilingualism: Definition and ways of assessment // Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2015. Т. 215. С. 218-224.
Bassetti B. Bilingualism and thought: Grammatical gender and concepts of objects in Italian-German bilingual children // International Journal of Bilingualism. 2007. Т. 11, №. 3. С. 251-273.