Parenthetical words and communicatives: semantic and pragmatic aspects of description | Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Filologiya – Tomsk State University Journal of Philology. 2018. № 51. DOI: 10.17223/19986645/51/6

Parenthetical words and communicatives: semantic and pragmatic aspects of description

The article is devoted to peripheral language units: (1) to parenthetical words and expressions and (2) to response units (communicatives). These language units act as pragmatic markers in discourse; they reproduce the speaker's attitude to what (s)he is saying at the moment. Parenthetical words and communicatives are often treated as special discursive words and as gambits in discourse analysis: markers of a speech act these units are attached to for a more smooth flow of communication. These units have very poor grammar, they are idiomatically fixed and can hardly be analyzed by means of traditional linguistic devices. One can find out the meaning and usage features of parenthetical words and communicatives by looking at the way these units function in discourse and by analyzing the communicative tasks they fulfill. The first part of the article is devoted to the syntactic, semantic and pragmatic characteristics of parenthetical words. It is noted that the many parenthetical words specify and intensify a speech act. The addresser includes such units in her/his speech to make it more fluent, to make the addressee ready to perceive the coming speech act, or to intensify the speech act effect. Communicatives are words and word combinations used in dialog as response units. They are used to express agreement, disagreement, to answer etiquette formulas, to express different emotions and so on. In many linguistic works communicatives and parenthetical words are treated as one functional class. The words (and collocations) analyzed in the article can be used in discourse in both functions. Yet it is demonstrated that the functions and meaning of these groups of words are fundamentally different, and it is the reason to divide these groups and study them separately. Parenthetical words are only an optional supplement to speech act, while communicatives ARE speech acts, interaction moves in dialog. Opposite to parenthetical words, communica-tives have phrase stress; being communicative reaction these units are accompanied with emotional mimics and gestures in oral dialog. All this information is very important for the description of communicatives. Some words used in both functions differ greatly in their meanings. For example, such synonymic collocations as bud' tak dobr, bud' tak liubezen, sdelay milost' [be so kind] as parenthetical words are used before or next to the directive to make it more delicate and polite; as a communicative unit these collocations fulfill the role of a thankful and a bit old-fashioned agreement, after the speaker gets a courteous offer to help him/her to do something useful to him/her or to somebody else.

Download file
Counter downloads: 310

Keywords

вводные слова и обороты, коммуникативы, семантика, прагматика, речевые акты, лексикография, parenthetical words and expressions, communicatives, semantics, pragmatics, lexicography

Authors

NameOrganizationE-mail
Sharonov Igor A.Russian State University for the HumanitiesIgor_sharonov@mail.ru
Всего: 1

References

Современный русский язык / под ред. В.А. Белошапковой. М. : Высш. шк., 1981. 560 с.
Ефремова Е.Ф. Толковый словарь служебных частей речи русского языка. М., 2001. 863 с.
Словарь структурных слов русского языка / под ред. В.В. Морковкина. М. : Изд-во альм. «Лазурь», 1997. 422 с.
Грамота.ру. URL: http://new.gramota.ru/spravka/punctum/punctum-alphabet
Баранов А.Н., Кобозева И.М. Вводные слова в семантической структуре предложения // Системный анализ значимых единиц русского языка: Синтаксические структуры : межвуз. сб. Красноярск, 1984. С. 83-93.
Розина Р.И. Так называемый: семантика вводных метаязыковых оборотов // Материалы международной конференции Диалог 2009. М., 2009. Вып. 8 (15). С. 426-432.
Падучева Е.В. Семантические исследования: Семантика времени и вида в русском языке. М. : Школа «Языки славянской культуры», 2011. 464 с.
Виноградов В.В. О категории модальности и модальных словах в русском языке // Труды Ин-та русского языка АН СССР. 1950. Т. 2. С. 38-89.
Вежбицка А. Метатекст в тексте // Новое в зарубежной лингвистике. М., 1978. Вып. 8. С. 402-421.
Апресян Ю.Д. Свойства прагматической информации: Прагматическая информация для толкового словаря // Апресян Ю.Д. Избранные труды. М., 1995. Т. 2. С. 135-155.
Keller E. Gambits: Conversational strategy signals // Conversational routine / ed. by F. Coulmas. The Hague, Netherlands : Mouton, 1981. Р. 93-113.
Coulmas F. Introduction: Conversational Routine // Conversational Routine: Exploration in standardized communication situations and prepatterned speech. The Hague : Mouton, 1981. P. 1-17.
Баранов А.Н., Плунгян В.А., Рахилина Е.В. Путеводитель по дискурсивным словам русского языка. М., 1993. 207 с.
Дискурсивные слова русского языка: опыт контекстно-семантического описания / под ред. К. Киселевой, Д. Пайара. М. : Метатекст, 1998. 206 с.
Новый объяснительный словарь синонимов русского языка / под общ. руковод. Ю.Д. Апресяна. М. : Языки русской культуры, 1997-2003. Вып. 1-3.
Национальный корпус русского языка. URL: http://ruscorpora.ru
 Parenthetical words and communicatives: semantic and pragmatic aspects of description | Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Filologiya – Tomsk State University Journal of Philology. 2018. № 51. DOI: 10.17223/19986645/51/6

Parenthetical words and communicatives: semantic and pragmatic aspects of description | Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Filologiya – Tomsk State University Journal of Philology. 2018. № 51. DOI: 10.17223/19986645/51/6

Download full-text version
Counter downloads: 2335