Semantic and Associative Factors in Lexical Processing of Polysemous Bionyms in Russian: Evidence from an Eye-Tracking Study in the Visual World Paradigm | Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Filologiya – Tomsk State University Journal of Philology. 2021. № 69. DOI: 10.17223/19986645/69/8

Semantic and Associative Factors in Lexical Processing of Polysemous Bionyms in Russian: Evidence from an Eye-Tracking Study in the Visual World Paradigm

The aim of the study is to provide experimental results of lexical processing of polyse-mous Russian bionyms. This study takes into account “online” mechanisms of lexical processing and uses eye movement parameters of subjects during listening to a polysemous word out of context. The Visual World Paradigm was used for experimental design modeling. This technique allows revealing some underpinnings of psychological representations of different meanings of a polysemous word. The choice of Russian bionyms (names of living organisms and plants) is due to the fact that this class of words falls into the core lexical system of almost any world language. This makes it possible to compare experimental results in languages of different structures. One important aspect of such modeling is not only the consideration of semantic, but also associative factors of lexical access to the meaning of polyse-mous bionyms. Thirty one Russian speakers were recruited for an eye-tracking experiment using the Visual World Paradigm. A dataset of audio stimuli contained 60 Russian nouns with varying degrees of word frequency, length and number of meanings. The visual panel contained different types of word referents: Т (target representing the dominant meaning of a spoken word), TD (target representing a diminutive spoken word), Hype (competitor representing hypo-hyperonymic relations with a spoken word), Hypo (competitor representing hypo-hyponymic relations with a spoken word), Meta (competitor representing the metaphorical meaning of a spoken word), Meto (competitor representing the metonymic meaning of a spoken word), A (competitor representing the associate for a spoken word), D (distractor unrelated to a spoken word). Every spoken word and visual panel with one target, two competitors and one distractor were presented for 1 200 ms without any context. After each trial participants were asked to respond how many meanings and associations of the spoken word were presented on the visual panel. Linear mixed effects modeling showed significant differences in several eye movement parameters of the subjects. The calculated models have moderate explanatory effect and this indicates the prospect of a further search for fixed effects controlling. The most surprising finding was the difference between the early (first fixation time) and late measures of polysemous word meaning processing. While the late measures of lexical processing are guided by a constant comparison of the input (auditory stimulus) with the irrelevant or weakly related referent, the early measures are influenced by the sequence of revisions of areas of interest that represent different referents. The first fixation on the first area of interest tended to be the shortest. At all stages of the ambiguous bionyms processing, the referents that reflected the dominant meaning were more activated in the subjects’ visual field during the first entering the area of interest, and later this activation was inhibited. Associative relations had significant effects in this process, interacting with other processes of extracting representations of word meanings from the subjects’ memory.

Download file
Counter downloads: 560

Keywords

polysemous word, polysemy, association, eye movements, Visual World Paradigm, experiment

Authors

NameOrganizationE-mail
Shkuropatskaya Marina G.Shukshin Altai State University for Humanities and Pedagogymarina-shkuropac@mail.ru
Vlasov Mikhail S.Shukshin Altai State University for Humanities and Pedagogy; Tomsk State Universityvlasov_mikhailo@mail.ru
Zhukova Tatyana V.Shukshin Altai State University for Humanities and Pedagogyzukowat@mail.ru
Isaeva Irina P.Shukshin Altai State University for Humanities and Pedagogyisaeva_ip@rambler.ru
Всего: 4

References

Stupina E., Myachykov A., Shtyrov Y. Automatic Lexical Access in Visual Modality: Eye-Tracking Evidence // Frontiers in Psychology. 2018. Vol. 9. P. 1847. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01847
Каприелова А.В., Лауринавичюте А.К., Лопухина А.А. Разрешение значений многозначных слов при чтении // Когнитивная наука в Москве: новые исследования: материалы конференции / под ред. Е.В. Печенковой, М.В. Фаликман. М. : БукиВеди, 2019. С. 206-211.
Tanenhaus M.K., Spivey-Knowlton M.J., Eberhard K.M., Sedivy J.C. Integration of visual and linguistic information in spoken language comprehension // Science. 1995. Vol. 268 (5217). P. 1632-1634. DOI: 10.1126/science.7777863
Tanenhaus M.K., Magnuson J.S., Dahan D., Chambers C. Eye Movements and Lexical Access in Spoken-Language Comprehension: Evaluating a Linking Hypothesis between Fixations and Linguistic Processing // Journal of Psycholinguistic Research. 2000. Vol. 29. P. 557-580. DOI: 10.1023/A:1026464108329
Yee E., Overton E., Thompson-Schill S.L. Looking for meaning: Eye movements are sensitive to overlapping semantic features, not association // Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 2009. Vol. 16. P. 869-874. DOI: 10.3758/PBR.16.5.869
Huettig F., Rommers J., Meyer A.S. Using the visual world paradigm to study language processing: A review and critical evaluation // Acta Psychologica. 2011. Vol. 137, is. 2. P. 151-171. DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.11.003
Eddington C.M, Tokowicz N. How meaning similarity influences ambiguous word processing: the current state of the literature // Psychonomic Bulletin and Review. 2015. Vol. 22 (1). P. 13-37. DOI: 10.3758/s13423-014-0665-7
Klein D.E, Murphy G.L. The Representation of polysemous words // Journal of Memory and Language. 2001. Vol. 45(2). P. 259-282. DOI: 10.1006/jmla.2001.2779
Klepousniotou E. The processing of lexical ambiguity: homonymy and polysemy in the mental lexicon // Brain and Language. 2002. Vol. 81(1-3). P. 205-223. DOI: 10.1006/brln.2001.2518
Klepousniotou E., Baum S.R. Disambiguating the ambiguity advantage effect in word recognition: An advantage for polysemous but not homonymous words // Journal of Neurolinguistics. 2007. Vol. 20(1). Pp. 1-24. DOI: 10.1016/j.jneuroling.2006.02.001
Rodd J., Gaskell G., Marslen-Wilson W. Making Sense of Semantic Ambiguity: Semantic Competition in Lexical Access // Journal of Memory and Language. 2002. Vol. 46(2). P. 245-266. DOI: 10.1006/jmla. 2001.2810
Cooper R.M. The control of eye fixation by the meaning of spoken language: A new methodology for the real-time investigation of speech perception, memory, and language processing // Cognitive Psychology. 1974. Vol. 6 (1). P. 84-107. DOI: 10.1016/0010-0285(74)90005-x.
Just M.A., Carpenter P.A. A Theory of Reading from Eye Fixations to Comprehension // Psychological Review. 1980. Vol. 87. P. 329-354.
Akinina Yu., Grabovskaya M., Vechkaeva A., Ignatyev G., Isaev D., Khanova A. Biblioteka psiholingvisticheskih stimulov: novye dannye dlja russkogo i tatarskogo jazyka // Seventh International Conference on Cognitive Science: Abstracts. Svetlogorsk, June 2024 2016. 2016. P. 93-95.
Brouwer S., Bradlow A.R. The Temporal Dynamics of Spoken Word Recognition in Adverse Listening Conditions // Journal of Psycholinguistic Research. 2016. Vol. 45 (5). P. 1151-1160. DOI: 10.1007/s10936-015-9396-9
Bartunov Sergey, Kondrashkin Dmitry, Osokin Anton, Vetrov Dmitry. Breaking Sticks and Ambiguities with Adaptive Skipgram. ArXiv preprint. 2015
Резанова З.И., Некрасова Е.Д. Семантика диминутивных суффиксов в восприятии носителей русского языка: влияние контекстных и социальных факторов // Вестник Томского государственного университета. 2017. № 421. DOI: 10.17223/15617793/421/2
 Semantic and Associative Factors in Lexical Processing of Polysemous Bionyms in Russian: Evidence from an Eye-Tracking Study in the Visual World Paradigm | Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Filologiya – Tomsk State University Journal of Philology. 2021. № 69. DOI: 10.17223/19986645/69/8

Semantic and Associative Factors in Lexical Processing of Polysemous Bionyms in Russian: Evidence from an Eye-Tracking Study in the Visual World Paradigm | Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Filologiya – Tomsk State University Journal of Philology. 2021. № 69. DOI: 10.17223/19986645/69/8

Download full-text version
Counter downloads: 1576