Assibilated laterals in acoustics and typology
Typological studies on sound change, palatalization and consonant harmony consider lateral consonants among liquids and do not pay much attention to lateral fricatives. Researchers show that palatalization transforms lateral sonorants to j or rhotics, whereas lateral fricatives receive only “secondary” palatalization, or additional articulation of palatalization. In this article, I focus on several cases of lateral-to-sibilant change, as a result of palatalization and of high acoustic variability of both laterals and sibilants. Lateral consonants are characterised by certain invariant properties of their spectrum; however, these consonants are generally characterised by a high degree of cross-linguistic variation. The voiceless alveolar fricative consonant i, which is the most common voiceless lateral, varies cross-linguistically more than any other fricative. I believe that the articulatory properties of laterals predispose them to high variability. Several acoustic characteristics can make laterals and sibilants similar: high intensity, high frequencies, “flat” spectrum. As a result, in some languages laterals can have- either across the board, or conditionally, or sporadically-realisations with a high degree of sibilant noise. In my article, I present three steps of the process: acoustic variation that is neglected in descriptions (Chukchi, Ubykh, Khanty, Andi), alternations in modern languages (Koryak) and reconstructed sound change (Turkic and Abkhaz-Adyghe). The analysis of linguistic reconstructions shows that in the Abkhaz-Adyghe, Turkic and Chukotko-Kamchatkan languages scholars suggest that lateral fricatives changed to alveolar or postalveolar sibilants. In modern Chukotka-Koryak languages there are pairs of words and morphemes similar or identical in meaning and distinguished by the “alternating” lateral or sibilant. To assess sporadic assibilation, field recordings in Khanty, Chukchi, Andi, and Ubykh were analyzed. Spectra and dynamic spectrograms show similarity between i and s, i and f While numerous examples of acoustic similarity and overlapping between laterals and sibilants can be found in modern languages, they are not discussed in linguistic descriptions or even in specialized phonetic papers. Among the reasons I can suggest perceptual correction that allows the listener to ignore sporadic assibilations of laterals, which are an intermediate step between the variability of the typical lateral consonant and the assibilations that the phonetic description captures. The author expresses her gratitude to the anonymous reviewers and the editorial board of the journal for their valuable comments and assistance. The author declares no conflicts of interests.
Keywords
laterals,
sibilants,
acoustic variation,
sound change,
palatalization,
consonant harmonyAuthors
Sieber Inna A. | National Research University Higher School of Economics | innasieber@gmail.com |
Всего: 1
References
Bateman N. A crosslinguistic investigation of palatalization. Ph. D., UC San Diego. UC San Diego Electronic Theses and Dissertations, 2007. 340 p. URL: http://escholar-ship.org/uc/item/1dw64743 (дата обращения: 09.09.2017).
Bhat D.N.S. A General Study of Palatalization. Universals of Human Language, Greenberg ed., 1978. P. 47-92.
Moran S., McCloy D. (eds.) PHOIBLE 2.0. Jena: Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History, 2009. URL: http://phoible.org.
Ladefoged P., Maddieson I. The Sounds of the World's Languages. Blackwell, 1996. 414 p.
Nartey J.N.A. On Fricative Phones and Phonemes: PhD Dissertation. UCLA, 1982. 141 p.
Колповская И.К., Спирова Л.Ф. Характеристика нарушений письма и чтения // Основы теории и практики логопедии / под ред. Р.Е. Левиной. М., 1968. 367 c.
Садовникова И.Н. Нарушения письменной речи и их преодоление у младших школьников: учеб. пособие. М., 1995. 256 c.
Maddieson I., Emmorey K. Is there a valid distinction between voiceless lateral approximants and fricatives? // Journal of Phonetics. 1984. № 41. P. 181-90.
Gordon M., Barthmaier P., Sands K. A cross-linguistic acoustic study of voiceless fricatives // Journal of International Phonetic Association. 2002. № 32. P. 141-174.
Зибер И.А., Мороз Г.А. Исследование акустической вариативности s методом главных компонент // Вестник Новосибирского государственного университета. Серия: Лингвистика и межкультурная коммуникация. 2019. № 1. С. 49-64.
Ball M.J., Muller N. Mutation in Welsh. London; New York: Routledge, 1992. 336 p.
Филичева Т.Б., Чевелева Н.А., Чиркина Г.В. Основы логопедии. М.: Просвещение, 1989. 223 с.
Волкова Л.С. (ред.) Логопедия. М.: Владос, 2006. 680 с.
Ohala J.J. The phonetics of sound change // Historical linguistics: Problems and perspectives. London; New York: Longman, 1993. P. 237-278.
Mann V.A., Repp B.H. Influence of vocalic context on perception of the [s] vs [s] distinction // Perception and Psychophysics. 1980. № 28. P. 213-228.
Иванов В.А. Фонетика говора с. Теги: Экспедиционный отчёт. Рукопись. Филологический факультет МГУ. 2010.
Кибрик А.Е., Кодзасов С.В. Сопоставительное изучение дагестанских языков: Имя. Фонетика. М.: МГУ, 1990. 336 с.
La Collection Pangloss, une archive des langues en danger. URL: http://lacito.vjf.cnrs.fr/pangloss/ (дата обращения: 09.09.2017).
Убыхский язык // Языки Российской Федерации и соседних государств. М.: Наука, 2005. Т. 3. С. 169-170.
Chirikba V.A.Common West Caucasian: The Reconstruction of its Phonological System and Parts of its Lexicon and Morphology (Research School CNWS. School of Asian, African, and Amerindian Studies). Leiden, 1996. 459 p.
Schneider R. The Semitic Sibilants. Correspondences and Discrepancies: PhD Thesis. Universitat Leipzig, 2022. 303 p.
Cole D.T. An Introduction to Tswana Grammar. Longman, 1955. P. xxxv, 473.
LaCharité D. On the need for negative constraints and repair: Consonant mutation in Setswana // Canadian Journal of Linguistics / Revue canadienne de linguistique. 1993. Vol. 38, special issue 2: Special Issue: Constraint-Based Theories in Multilinear Phonology. P. 257-278.
Мудрак О.А. Этимологический словарь чукотско-камчатских языков. М.: Языки русской культуры, 2000. 284 c.
Володин А.П. Ительменский язык // Языки мира. Палеоазиатские языки. М.: Индрик, 1997.
Dybowski B. Словарь ительменского языка. Warszawa: Energeia, 1998. [Radliński I. Slowniki narzeczny ludów Kamczackich (compiler B. Dybowski). Kraków: Rozprawy Akademii UmiejEtnoSci, wydzial filologiczny].
Fortescue M.Comparative Chukotko-Kamchatkan Dictionary. Berlin; New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 2005. 496 p.
Муравьёва И.А. Сопоставительное исследование морфонологии чукотского, корякского и алюторского языков: дис.. канд. филол. наук. М., 1979. 274 c.
Hansson G.O. Theoretical and typological issues in consonant harmony: Ph.D. dissertation. Berkeley: University of California, 2001. 547 p.
Rose Sh., Walker R. A typology of consonant agreement as correspondence // Language. 2004. № 80. P. 475-531.
Rose Sh., Walker R. Harmony systems. Handbook of Phonological Theory. Second Edition / ed. by John Goldsmith, Jason Riggle, Alan Yu. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 2011. P. 240-290.
Blust R. The Prehistory of the Austronesian-Speaking Peoples: A View from Language // Journal of World Prehistory. 1995. Vol. 9, № 4. P. 453-510.
Скорик П.Я. Грамматика чукотского языка. Ч. 1: Фонетика и морфология именных частей речи. М.; Л.: Изд-во АН СССР, 1961. 448 c.
Dunn M. A Grammar of Chukchi. PhD thesis. Canberra: Australian National University, 1999. 410 p.
Зибер И.А. Сегментная фонетика: Консонантизм (амгуэмский говор) // Грамматический очерк чукотского языка. 2019. URL: www.chuklang.ru.