The theoretical and methodological basis of differentiating between genres of professional discourse | Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Filologiya – Tomsk State University Journal of Philology. 2014. № 5 (31).

The theoretical and methodological basis of differentiating between genres of professional discourse

This article presents a new vision of differentiating between genres of professional discourse, based on the theoretical principles of critical discourse analysis (Fairclough 2003, 2005, 2006) and critical genre analysis (Bhatia 2004, 2008, 2010). Drawing evidence from a number of professional musical contexts (a jam session, a musical review and a live concert), this study explores the nature of professional discourse and suggests ways of understanding and characterizing its genres. This study encompasses language about music (e.g., musical journals, forums, books), language accompanying music (music-making or performance) and other semiotic elements (body language, images, music, sound) as ways of creating and communicating meaning. Professional genres are shown as configurations of text-internal and text-external features. The study describes the methodology of distinguishing between discursive genres in professional communication, which includes four main stages: (1) definition of the activity type; (2) definition of the social context of the given genre; (3) analysis of textual peculiarities; (4) development of the inner genre structure. The activity types help draw a general view of professional musical discourse representing the main four stages of 'life' of a musical product: 'creation of the musical product', 'completed musical product', 'distribution' and 'perception/evaluation of the musical product', as well as two additional stages, 'description/reflection' of musical products and 'records management'. The second stage comprises the analysis of text-internal resources, such as activity, communication technology, level of formality, situation type, place of communication, normative expectations, social roles, types of communication, and social relations. At this stage, 'qualitative social analysis' (Fairclough 2003), ethnographic interviews, analysis of academic literature and Internet resources seem efficient. In the analysis of professional discourse, the role of context should not be underestimated, for the specific text-external properties determine the textual features peculiar to different professional genres. The third stage comprises the analysis of text-internal resources, such as text type, text structure, style, correlation of specialized language lexemes, and nonverbal language use. A special focus is on the status of specialized language units (musical terms, professionalisms and jargonisms). It is verified with the help of dictionaries of specialized language lexemes and online musical dictionaries. Finally, the inner genre structure is developed in order to differentiate between the subgenres of professional discourse. The suggested methodology of professional discourse analysis is shown to provide answers to why and how professionals manipulate genre conventions in order to achieve specific complex tasks within special disciplines as well as to draw boundaries between genres and subgenres of professional discourse.

Download file
Counter downloads: 183

Keywords

multimodality, social context, critical genre analysis, critical discourse analysis, musical discourse, genre, professional discourse, мультимодальность, социальный контекст, критический жанровый анализ, критический дискурс-анализ, музыкальный дискурс, профессиональный дискурс, жанр

Authors

NameOrganizationE-mail
Aleshinskaya Yevgeniya V.Moscow Witte Universityaleshinskaya_jane@yahoo.co.uk
Всего: 1

References

Doffman M. Jammin’ an ending: Creativity, knowledge, and conduct among jazz musicians // Twentieth-Century Music. 2011. Vol. 8. No. 2. P. 203-225.
Sawyer R.K. Group creativity: Music, theater, collaboration. Mahwah. NJ; L.: Lawrence Erl-baum Associates, Publishers, 2003. 224 p.
Becker H. The etiquette of improvisation // Mind, Culture, and Activity. 2000, Vol. 7. No. 3. P. 171-176.
Berliner P. Thinking in jazz: The infinite art of improvisation. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1994. 852 p.
http://www.theo2.co.uk/visit-us/useful-information (дата обращения: 07.06.2014).
http://www.the-jazz-cat.com/jazz-slang-dictionary.html (дата обращения: 01.04.2014).
Solomon L. Music theory and analysis [Электронный ресурс] // Solomon’s music resources: сайт. URL: http://www.solomonsmusic.net/theory.htm (дата обращения: 01.04.2014).
Latham A. Oxford companion to music. N.Y.: Oxford University Press, 2002. 1450 p.
Grove music online [Электронный ресурс] // Oxford music online: сайт. URL: http:// www.grovemusic.com (дата обращения: 01.04.2014).
Алешинская Е.В. Современный американский музыкальный термин: лингвистический статус и специфика // Вестн. Чуваш. ун-та. 2007. № 4. Гуманит. науки. С. 128-132.
Bowker L., Pearson J. Working with specialized language: A practical guide to using corpora. L.; N.Y.: Routledge, 2002. 257 p.
Red Hot Dave. How to write a good music review [Электронный ресурс] // Hub pages: сайт. URL: http://redhotdave.hubpages.com/hub/How-to-write-a-good-music-review (дата обращения: 03.01.2014).
Kernfeld B. New Grove dictionary of jazz. N.Y.: Oxford University Press, 2003. 3000 p.
General Bob Balogh’s Jassical Boot Camp rules and regulations [Электронный ресурс] // Somerset Jazz Consortium & Jam Sessions: сайт. URL: http://www.somersetjazz.com/id33.html (дата обращения: 03.01.2014).
Green A. The 10 most annoying concert behaviors // Rolling stone music: журн. 14.01.2013. URL: http://www.rollingstone.com/music/news/the-10-most-annoying-concert-behaviors-20130114 (дата обращения: 03.01.2014).
Aleshinskaya E. Differentiating between genres of musical discourse // Topics in linguistics. 2013. Is. 12. P. 46-55.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EaiB4-Dizms (дата обращения: 01.07.2014).
Hermes W. Wilco: iTunes session // Rolling stone. February 16, 2012. Is. 1150. P. 60.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ImzuSU5kw1g (дата обращения: 12.02.2014).
PavlovovaM. Complex linguistic analysis of musical discourse: The genre of concert notice. Saarbrucken: LAP, 2013. 268 p.
De Nora T. Music in everyday life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000. 196 p.
Мудрян Н.С. Теоретико-методологические основания исследования дискурса музыки // Вестн. Харьков. национального ун-та им. В.Н. Каразина. 2011. № 941. С. 89-92.
Machin D. Analysing popular music: Image, sound, text. L.: Sage, 2010. 240 p.
Androutsopoulos J. Multilingualism, ethnicity, and genre: The case of German hip-hop // Terkourafi M. (ed.) The languages of global hip hop. L.: Continuum, 2010. P. 19-44.
Agawu K. Music as discourse: Semiotic adventures in romantic music. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press, 2009. 345 p.
Sawyer R.K. Music and conversation // Musical communication / Ed. by D. Meill, R. MacDonald, D.J. Hargreaves. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press, 2005. P. 45-60.
Гриценко Е.С., Дуняшева Л.Г. Языковые особенности рэпа в аспекте глобализации // Политическая лингвистика. 2013. № 2 (44). С. 141-147.
Bhatia V.K. Worlds of written discourse. L.; N.Y.: Continuum, 2004. 235 p.
Bhatia V.K. Genre analysis, ESP and professional practice // English for specific purposes. 2008. Vol. 27. Is. 2. P. 161-174.
Bhatia V.K. Interdiscursivity in professional communication // Discourse & communication. 2010. Vol. 21. Is. 1. P. 32-50.
Gunnarsson, B.-L. Professional discourse. L.$ N.Y.: Continuum, 2009. 284 p.
Aleshinskaya E. Key components of musical discourse analysis // Research in language. 2013. Vol. 11: 4. P. 423-444.
Fairclough N. Language and globalization. L.: Routledge, 2006. 167 p.
Fairclough N. Critical discourse analysis in transdisciplinary research // A new agenda in (critical) discourse analysis / Ed. by R. Wodak and P. Chilton. Amsterdam - Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2005. P. 53-70.
Fairclough N. Analysing discourse: Textual analysis for social research. L.: Routledge, 2003. 284 p.
Bhatia V.K., Flowerdew J., Jones R.H. (eds). Advances in discourse studies. L.; N.Y.: Routledge, 2008. 273 p.
Голованова Е.И. Профессиональный дискурс, субдискурс, жанр профессиональной коммуникации: соотношение понятий // Вестн. Челяб. гос. ун-та. 2013. №1 (292). Филология. Искусствоведение. Вып. 73. С. 32-35.
Coutinho M.A., Miranda F. To describe genres: Problems and strategies // Bazerman C. et al. Genre in a changing world. Fort Collins, Colorado: The WAC Clearing House, 2009. P. 35-55.
Тырыгина В.А. Жанровая стратификация масс-медийного дискурса. М.: URRS, 2010. 319 с.
Halliday M.A.K., Martin J.R. Writing science: Literary and discursive power. L.: Falmer, 1993. 300 p.
Жанры естественной письменной речи: Студенческие граффити, маргинальные страницы тетрадей, частная записка / Н.Б. Лебедева, Е.Г. Зырянова, Н.Ю. Плаксина, Н.И. Тюкаева. М.: КРАСАНД, 2011. 256 с.
 The theoretical and methodological basis of differentiating between genres of professional discourse | Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Filologiya – Tomsk State University Journal of Philology. 2014. № 5 (31).

The theoretical and methodological basis of differentiating between genres of professional discourse | Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Filologiya – Tomsk State University Journal of Philology. 2014. № 5 (31).

Download full-text version
Counter downloads: 1393