Functionality of the "communicational-communicative" dyad: discursive aspect

The article considers the specifics of the functionality of the "communicational-communicative" dyad in a discursive aspect. The study of this pair of lexemes is relevant in the context of their high frequency and importance in the context of metalinguistic support of modern communication. Complex discourse analysis of the lexemes "communicational" and "communicative" assumes the multidimensional consideration of their functionality in the Russian language and the involvement of data of computer-mediated discourse. The discursive practice of modern communication is due to its computer mediation, manifested as a phenomenological keynote. Informatization and computer maintainability of modern linguistics require high precision and practical orientation of language data. The oppositiveness of the "communicational-communicative" dyad is essential for the representation of its semantics as a set of variants of speech practice. A complex review of the functionality of the "communicational-communicative" opposition allows consideration of few subaspects and aggregates a kind of discursive hyperaspect, integrating the specifics and logic of the considered relations in broad intra- and extra-linguistic contexts. An important feature in this context is the interdependence of intra- and extra-linguistic functionality of discourse that influences speech practice. Intra-linguistic reasoning demanded an actualization of the phenomenological potential of the discussed lexemes as well as of the whole lexical-semantic field "communication". Detailed discursive explication of relevant semantics based on lexicographic practice was useful. The practice of widespread use of vocabulary that is related to the lexical-semantic field "communication" is due to numerous situations of borrowing of not only lexemes, but also contexts that contain them. In the cross-language aspect, the discursive implementation of the "communi-cational-communicative" pair confirms the extra-linguistic motivation of priority of the unit "communicative". Metalanguage and metalinguistic generalizations regarding the details of the functioning of the "communicational-communicative" dyad as a model are given. Opportunities of analyzing the relevant features of language units functionality in the form of metalinguistic oppositiveness and paradigmatics indexes are found on the material of representative speech practice. The use of attributive "communication" is more justified to indicate the affiliation of any denotation to the field "communication", the term "communicative" semantically corresponds to a sufficient feature of the denotation in the field "communication". The discursive practice of the functioning of the "communicational-communicative" dyad is complicated and ambiguous, susceptible to the influence of the relevant factors.

Keywords

Authors

References