Literature and pictorial art in A.N. Maikov's artistic criticism. Article One: The ground for oral lore and pictorial art rapprochement in A.N. Maikov's critical legacy | Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Filologiya – Tomsk State University Journal of Philology. 2016. № 3 (41).

Literature and pictorial art in A.N. Maikov's artistic criticism. Article One: The ground for oral lore and pictorial art rapprochement in A.N. Maikov's critical legacy

In the aesthetic context of the 1840s and centuries-long interest of literature to the plastic arts Maikov's reference to the pictorial art is a natural phenomenon. During his aesthetic self-determination, the poet consciously fulfilled himself as a critic of art. Herewith, for his historic and theoretical reflection, he chose the sort of art which is, due to its constitutive properties, very close to literature. Maikov's approach to works of visual arts founds on his experience of literary oeuvre, considers the accounts and requests the readers and critics made towards the works of modern literature, including his own poems. He looks at the works of visual art from the standpoint of the aesthetic goals offered by modern Russian literature and literary criticism. Here the major quality of Maikov's articles about the Academy of Arts exhibitions is manifested: the apprehension of literature and painting as the two arts, using different approaches and techniques, but meeting the same eternal requirements and requirements of the time, solving the same tasks and serving the same cause. This approach is determined by the fact that in the mind of Maikov-critic different sorts of art obey the same laws and meet the same requirements specified by the level of moral, spiritual and intellectual development of the modern man. That is why interpretation of different problems of visual arts is always connected with thoughts about literature, and works of modern writers turn into a mirror for reading the content of pictures of different genres. Pictorial art and literature in the critic's articles form an indivisible unity. It is clearly demonstrated in his opinion on the truth to the nature issue and its relation to inspiration and the author's compassion, which are important qualities of the genuine work of art. Using the principle of analogy to analyze The Little Tavern by Rizzoni, he appeals to the experience of Gogol, who masterfully combines realistic accuracy of depiction and deep compassion for the depicted. In all Maikov's articles about the Emperor's Academy of Arts exhibitions, connection of literature and pictorial art becomes a fruitful ground, which helps them overcome the boundaries of traditional exhibition reviews and turn into a significant phenomenon in the development of Russian artistic and literary criticism of the time. That is why the fact that literature always stands behind visual arts is very natural. For Maikov, painting becomes the material which helps easier, clearer and more expressively understand the topical problems of modern literature development and discovers new opportunities for the lore itself, enriching it with formerly unavailable things, in particular, teaches it to use the semantic potential of visible images.

Download file
Counter downloads: 206

Keywords

живопись, литература, художественная критика, А.Н. Майков, выставки в Императорской Академии художеств, A.N. Maikov, artistic criticism, literature, pictorial art, Emperor's Academy of Arts exhibitions

Authors

NameOrganizationE-mail
Sedelnikova Olga V.Tomsk Polytechnic Universitysedelnikovaov@tpu.ru
Всего: 1

References

Седельникова О.В. Ф.М. Достоевский и кружок Майковых. Томск: Изд-во Том поли-техн. ун-та, 2006.
Майков А. Н. Годичная выставка в Императорской Академии художеств // Отечественные записки. 1853. Т. 91, № 11, отд. 2. С. 21-48.
Манн Ю.В. Русская философская эстетика. М.: Искусство, 1969.
Потебня А.А. Мысль и язык. Харьков, 1892.
Седельникова О.В. В дополнение комментария к письмам Ф.М. Достоевского А.Н. Майкову: (Письмо о «поэме» Достоевского и события русской история в творческом осмыслении Майкова) // Сиб. филол. журн. 2012. № 2. С. 95-103.
Майков В.Н. Литературная критика. Л.: Худож. лит., 1985.
Майков А.Н. Выставка картин г. Айвазовского в 1847 году // Отечественные записки. 1847. Т. 51, № 4, отд. 2. С. 166-176.
Достоевский Ф.М. Полное собрание сочинений и писем: в 30 т. Л.: Наука, 1972-1990.
Майков А.Н. Выставка в Императорской Академии художеств // Отечественные записки. 1850. Т. 73, № 11, отд. 2. С. 57-74.
Майков А.Н. Выставка в Императорской Академии художеств в 1849 году // Отечественные записки. 1849. Т. 67, № 11, отд. 2. С. 19-40.
Майков А.Н. Годичная выставка в Императорской Академии художеств // Современник. 1847. № 11. С. 57-80.
Седельникова О.В. Проблема современного содержания произведения искусства в статьях А.Н. Майкова о выставках в академии художеств // Вестн. Челяб. гос. ун-та. Сер. Филология. Искусствоведение. 2009. № 43 (181). С. 123-128.
Седельникова О.В. Проблема историзма в статьях А.Н. Майкова о выставках в Императорской Академии художеств // Вестн. Том. гос. ун-та. 2011. № 346. С. 36-39.
Майков А.Н. Путевой дневник 1842-43 гг. Итальянская проза. СПб.: Пушкинский Дом, 2013.
Белинский В.Г. Полное собрание сочинений и писем: в 11 т. М.: АН СССР, 1953-1959.
Седельникова О.В. Проблема жанров живописи в художественной критике А.Н. Майкова // Вестн. Том. гос. ун-та. 2011. № 353. С. 42-47.
Седельникова О.В. Проблемы атрибуции статей А.Н. Майкова о выставках в Императорской Академии художеств. Статья вторая // Вестн. Том. гос. ун-та. 2014. № 381. C. 52-57.
Седельникова О.В. Проблемы атрибуции статей А.Н. Майкова о выставках в Императорской Академии художеств. Статья первая // Вестн. Том. гос. ун-та. 2014. № 380. C. 34-40.
Рубинс М. «Пластическая радость красоты»: Экфрасис в творчестве акмеистов и европейская традиция. СПб.: Академический проект, 2003. 354 с.
Корецкая И.В. Литература в кругу искусств // Русская литература рубежа веков (1890-е -начало 1920-х гг.): в 2 кн. Кн. 1. М., 2001. С. 131-191.
Женетт Ж. Палимпсесты: литература во второй степени. М.: Наука, 1989.
Алексеев М.П. Взаимодействие литературы с другими видами искусств как предмет научного изучения // Русская литература и зарубежное искусств. Л., 1986. С. 5-19.
Фарыно Е. Семиотические аспекты поэзии о живописи // Russian literature. 1979. Vol. 7. P. 65-94.
Дмитриева Н.А. Изображение и слово. М.: Искусство, 1962.
Пигарев К. Русская литература и изобразительное искусство. М.: Наука, 1966.
Альфонсов В. Слова и краски. М.; Л.: Сов. писатель, 1966.
 Literature and pictorial art in A.N. Maikov's artistic criticism. Article One: The ground for oral lore and pictorial art rapprochement in A.N. Maikov's critical legacy | Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Filologiya – Tomsk State University Journal of Philology. 2016. № 3 (41).

Literature and pictorial art in A.N. Maikov's artistic criticism. Article One: The ground for oral lore and pictorial art rapprochement in A.N. Maikov's critical legacy | Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Filologiya – Tomsk State University Journal of Philology. 2016. № 3 (41).

Download full-text version
Counter downloads: 1513