Speech forms of other discourses in the personality-oriented dialect text

The purpose of this article is to present the specifics of the use of speech forms stabilized in institutional discourses in the practices of extra-institutional communication of dialect speakers. Intentional specificity of the discursive picture of the world of institutional discourses is expressed in special forms of speech that receive a stable modus content. The formal and conceptual stabilization of these units reflects the socially determined axiological position of discourses typical for the given society and is adopted by speakers in the processes of participation in relevant social speech practices. The social organization of human existence outside institutions presupposes that people have ideas about the stratification of social spheres, about social practices, including discursive ones. In particular, this shows when people perceive institutional discourses as authoritative when they act as subjects of personality-oriented discourse. But this authority may be reinterpreted by the subject as true or false, which results in the preservation, neutralization or transformation of the meaning implied by the source discourse. The research focuses on the dialect speaker of the older generation as a particular type of subject of personality-oriented discourse, with a specific nature of social existence, a specific set of acquired social speech practices and a special nature of their acquisition. The set of speech forms stabilized in institutional discourses that the speaker uses, as well as the nature of their subjective interpretation, depends on how many speech practices of relevant source discourses the subject knows and how they have been acquired, on the attitude of the speaker to their social authority embodied in the implementation of concrete situational subjective intentions. The type of the subject is determined based on their belonging to a particular social and speech culture (the speech culture typology is developed in works by V.E. Goldin, O.B. Sirotinina, E.N. Shiryaev et al.). Personality-oriented communication has two social speech types of subjects. The second type is analyzed. The subject of this type has a low level of differentiation of functional areas of speech experience acquisition. In gaining this experience such a subject is focused on the discursive features of language functioning less than the first type of the subject. As a result, in the dialect text, due to the specifics of the speech experience of the subject and the nature of the acquisition of epistemological models of its implementation, the content of speech forms of institutional discourses shows, on the one hand, a high level of dependence on the modus meaning set in the source, on the other, often "formal", incomplete perception of it (a speech form only expresses individual components of its content that a discourse sets, in isolation from others). As a result, there is a high level of transformation and frequent actualization of the modus of the source, as well as the use of institutional forms of speech regardless of the semantic conditionality of colloquial communication.

Keywords

Authors

References