Incomplete neutralisation as a result of place assimilation of palatalised sibilants at word boundaries in Modern Standard Russian | Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Filologiya – Tomsk State University Journal of Philology. 2017. № 50. DOI: 10.17223/19986645/50/4

Incomplete neutralisation as a result of place assimilation of palatalised sibilants at word boundaries in Modern Standard Russian

The paper describes a phonetic experiment that dealt with the place assimilation of voiceless palatalised alveolar fricative /s1/ by following postalveolar alveo-palatal fricative /e:/ at word boundaries in Modern Standard Russian. As the former sibilant is commonly described as a geminated sound and Russian prohibits long consonants in positions near other consonants, the assimilation process can potentially lead to neutralisation in such minimal pairs of word combinations as proyavila shchedrost' [(she) showed generosity] andproyavilas' shchedrost' [generosity showed itself]. The participants of the experiment, 20 native Russian speakers (10 men and 10 women aged 18 to 40), were instructed to read a list of sentences that included 8 minimal pairs of target word combinations embedded in carrier phrases. All stimuli were recorded in intervocalic position; phrasal accent on stimuli was avoided; accent structure of the target word combinations was deliberately varied (clusters were recorded in all possible positions with regard to stressed and unstressed vowels). All recordings were analysed using computer software Praat. The duration and homogeneity of fricative noise were measured. Spectral analysis showed that in 78% of cases place assimilation of sibilants at word boundaries was complete. The measurements of duration confirmed that this parameter could vary widely, mostly in connection with stress. The duration of [e(:)] sounds within minimal pairs pronounced by the same speaker showed that in similar conditions in 95.5% of cases the sound representing the underlying /sj#e:/ was longer than the surface representation of the underlying /#e:/ (mean difference 34,9 ms; mean duration ratio 1,26). In order to find out whether these durational differences can be used by native speakers to distinguish minimal pairs a perception experiment was conducted. 15 native speakers, students aged 17-19, were presented with 35 stimuli (word consequences recorded during the described above experiment, but removed from phrasal context; the duration of the fricative varied widely from 135 to 202 ms). The participants' task was to write down what they think they heard. Their responses demonstrated that they could not reliably distinguish tokens with place assimilation of underlying /s1/ (the number of correct guesses was at a chance rate - 50.8%) and tokens without underlying /s1/ (the number of correct guesses was only slightly larger - 57.1%) despite the significant durational differences. The described phenomenon can be interpreted as a case of incomplete neutralisation. The experiments showed that the neutralisation of /#e:/ and /s"#e:/ at word boundaries in Russian is phonetically incomplete due to the significant durational differences between the produced fricatives, although these acoustic cues were not used by native speakers in distinguishing minimal pairs.

Download file
Counter downloads: 164

Keywords

современный русский язык, фонетика, внешнее сандхи, коартикуля-ция, щелевые согласные, ассимиляция по месту образования, неполная нейтрализация, Modern Standard Russian, phonetics, external sandhi, coarticulation, fricatives, place assimilation, incomplete neutralisation

Authors

NameOrganizationE-mail
Duryagin Pavel V.Higher School of Economicspavelustug@mail.ru
Всего: 1

References

Каленчук М. Л., Касаткин Л. Л., Касаткина Р. Ф. Большой орфоэпический словарь русского языка. Литературное произношение и ударение начала XXI века: норма и ее варианты. М.: АСТ-ПРЕСС, 2012. 1008 с.
Timberlake A. A Reference Grammar of Russian. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004. 503 p.
Kochetov A. Acoustics of Russian Voiceless Sibilant Fricatives // Journal of the International Phonetic Association. 2017. P. 1-28. DOI:10.1017/S0025100317000019.
Аванесов Р. И. Русское литературное произношение. М.: Просвещение, 1984. 383 с.
Панов М. В. Русская фонетика. М.: Просвещение, 1967. 440 с.
Coats, H. S. On the phonemic status of Russian [S':] // Russian Linguistics. 1997. № 21(2). P. 157-164.
Флайер М. Избранные труды. Т. 1: Работы по синхроническому языкознанию. М.: Языки славянской культуры, 2010. 696 с.
Национальный корпус русского языка. URL: http://www.ruscorpora.ru (дата последнего обращения: 11.04.2017).
Русская грамматика. Т. 1: Фонетика. Фонология. Ударение. Интонация. Словообразование. Морфология / Н.Ю. Шведова (гл. ред.). М.: Наука, 1980. 789 с.
Князев С.В. Об иерархии фонологических правил в русском языке (несколько новых соображений по поводу язв А.А. Реформатского) // Семиотика, лингвистика, поэтика: К столетию со дня рождения А.А. Реформатского. М., 2004. С. 133-150.
Русский язык и советское общество: Социолого-лингвистическое исследование. Фонетика современного русского литературного языка. Народные говоры / АН СССР. Ин-т рус. яз.; под ред. М.В. Панова. М.: Наука, 1968. 213 с.
Баринова Г.А. Редукция гласных в разговорной речи // Развитие фонетики современного русского языка. М.: Наука, 1971. С. 97-116.
Zsiga E.C. Phonetic alignment constraints: Consonant overlap and palatalization in English and Russian // Journal of Phonetics. 2000. № 28(1). P. 69-102.
Гусева М.Е. О некоторых фонетических явлениях на стыках слов в современном литературном русском языке // Проблемы фонетики, IV. М., 2002. С. 196-200.
Boersma P., Weenink, D. Praat: doing phonetics by computer [Computer program]. Version 6.0.22 retrieved 25.11.2016 from http://www.praat.org/
Дурягин П. В. Коартикуляционные изменения согласных по месту и способу образования на стыках слов в современном русском литературном языке: дис.. канд. филол. наук. М., 2016. 212 с.
Port R., O'Dell M. Neutralization of syllable-final voicing in German // Journal of Phonetics. 1985. № 13(4). P. 455-471.
Dinnsen D.A., Charles-Luce J. Phonological neutralization, phonetic implementation and individual differences // Journal of Phonetics. 1985. № 12 (1). P. 49-60.
Roettger T.B., Winter B., Grawunder S., Kirby J., Grice M. Assessing incomplete neutralization of final devoicing in German // Journal of Phonetics. 2014. № 43(1). P. 11-25.
Pye S. Word-final devoicing of obstruents in Russian // Cambridge Papers in Phonetics and Experimental Linguistics. 1986. № 5. P. 1-10.
Shrager M. Neutralization of word-final voicing in Russian // Journal of Slavic Linguistics. 2012. № 20. P. 71-99.
Dmitrieva O., Jongman A., Sereno J. Phonological neutralization by native and non-native speakers: The case of Russian final devoicing // Journal of Phonetics. 2010. № 38(3). P. 483-492.
Kharlamov V. Incomplete neutralization of the voicing contrast in word-final obstruents in Russian: Phonological, lexical, and methodological influences // Journal of Phonetics. 2014. № 43(1). P. 47-56.
Kharlamov V. Perception of incompletely neutralized voicing cues in word-final obstruents: The role of differences in production context // Laboratory Phonology. 2015. 2015. № 6(2). P. 147-165.
 Incomplete neutralisation as a result of place assimilation of palatalised sibilants at word boundaries in Modern Standard Russian | Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Filologiya – Tomsk State University Journal of Philology. 2017. № 50. DOI:  10.17223/19986645/50/4

Incomplete neutralisation as a result of place assimilation of palatalised sibilants at word boundaries in Modern Standard Russian | Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Filologiya – Tomsk State University Journal of Philology. 2017. № 50. DOI: 10.17223/19986645/50/4

Download full-text version
Counter downloads: 3208