Distribution and Origin of Various Phonation Types in the Turkic Languages of South Siberia | Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Filologiya – Tomsk State University Journal of Philology. 2020. № 68. DOI: 10.17223/19986645/68/1

Distribution and Origin of Various Phonation Types in the Turkic Languages of South Siberia

This article presents the preliminary results of a study that was supposed to clarify the questions of the presence of a phonological status and of the origin of a number of prosodic phenomena discovered over the past 50 years by various researchers. The authors collected field materials from speakers of a significant portion of dialects. The survey was carried out using a special questionnaire containing potential minimum and quasi-minimum pairs of monosyllabic stems with Turkic etymologies. These data were recorded using digital voice recorders. In each surveyed settlement, if possible, at least 3 speakers were interviewed. The material of the questionnaires was analyzed both by the auditory method and by the Praat acoustic analysis program; spectrograms and oscillograms were accompanied by transcriptional interpretation. With the help of acoustic analysis, coupled with the comparative historical support of sound dictionaries, it was possible to identify two geographical areas in the surveyed territory in which the historical processes of the formation of phonologically significant phonation types (including the Tuvan and Tofalar so-called “pharyngealization”) were of different nature. Pharyngealization, the effect of pre-aspiration on the reflexes of Proto-Turkic short vowels before obstruents, occurs in one of these areas: Tuvan, Tofa, Saryg Yugur (a close relation of Khakas), Chelkan Altaic. In the second area (Tashtyp, Shor, Kyzyl dialects of Khakas, Mrassu Shor, Melet subdialect of Middle Chulym, Tuba and Kumandy Altaic dialects), the authors have found kinds of glottalization of the reflexes of Proto-Turkic long vowels, which exist regardless of the quality of the subsequent consonants, but are realized in slightly different ways depending on it. In the case of sonantic finals, even the formation of a glottal stop after these sonants can be observed. Since the boundaries of both areas do not coincide with the boundaries of the genealogical groups of dialects, it can be assumed that the hypothesis of the Novosibirsk school of phonetic research, which connects “pharyngealizations” with pre-Turkic substrates, is correct. At the same time, the phonological difference itself, which has been reinterpreted in various ways in the phonetics of modern languages, of course, has its own Turkic origin.

Download file
Counter downloads: 237

Keywords

Turkic languages of Southern Siberia, acoustic phonetics, pharyngealization, phonation types, primary long vowels

Authors

NameOrganizationE-mail
Dybo Anna V.Institute of Linguistics of the Russian Academy of Sciences; Tomsk State University; Higher School of Economicsadybo@mail.ru
Maltseva Vera S.Institute of Linguistics of the Russian Academy of Sciences; Tomsk State Universitymalt.wh@gmail.com
Nikolaev Sergey L.Institute of Slavic Studies of the Russian Academy of Sciences; Tomsk State Universitysergenicko@mail.ru
Sultrekova Elvira V.Tomsk State Universityel_kyr@mail.ru
Sheimovitsh Alexandra V.Institute of Linguistics of the Russian Academy of Sciences; Tomsk State Universityasheimovich@yandex.ru
Всего: 5

References

Селютина И.Я. Фонологические системы языков народов Сибири. Новосибирск, 2004.
Селютина И.Я., Уртегешев Н.С., Рыжикова Т.Р., Дамбыра И.Д., Кечил-оол С.В. Фарингализация как типологический признак фонологических систем (на материале тюркских языков Южной Сибири). Новосибирск, 2014.
Хисамитдинова Ф.Г. О фарингализованном заднеязычном А в башкирском языке // Фонетика языков Сибири и сопредельных регионов. Новосибирск, 1986. С. 46-49.
Уртегешев Н.С. Малошумный консонантизм шорского языка (на материале мрасского диалекта). Новосибирск, 2004.
Курпешко-Таннагашева Н.Н., Апонькин Ф.Я. Шор-казак пазок казак-шор ургедиг состук. Кемерово, 1993.
Сарбашева С.Б. Фонологическая система туба-диалекта алтайского языка (в сопоставительном аспекте). Новосибирск, 2004.
Ladefoged P., Maddieson I. The Sounds of the World’s Languages. Blackwell Publishers Ltd., 1996.
Кодзасов 1985 - Материалы С.В. Кодзасова. Не опубликованы, хранятся в архиве кафедры оделения теоретической и прикладной лингвистики, филологический факультет МГУ.
Anderson G.D., Harrison K.D. Tyvan (Languages of the World/Materials 257). Munchen ; Newcastle, 1999.
Бичелдей К.А. Фарингализация в тувинском языке. Кызыл, 1999.
Исхаков Ф.Г., Пальмбах А.А. Грамматика тувинского языка. М., 1961.
Поппе Н.Н. Заметки о фонетике танну-тувинского языка в связи с вопросом об алфавите // Культура и письменность Востока. Баку, 1929. IV. С. 49-61.
Иллич-Свитыч В.М. Алтайские дентальные: t, d, 5 // Вопросы языкознания. 1963. № 6. С. 37-56.
Janhunen J. On glottalization in Sayan Turkic // Bulletin of the Institute for the Study of North Eurasian Cultures. 1980. № 13. P. 23-41.
Рассадин В.И. Фонетика и лексика тофаларского языка. Улан-Удэ, 1971.
Roos M. Preaspiration in Western Yugur monosyllables // Turcologica 32. The Mainz Meeting. Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Turkish Linguistics / ed. by Lars Johanson et al. Harrassowitz Verlag, 1999. P. 28-41.
Roos M. The Western Yugur Language. Grammar, Texts, Vocabulary. PhD. Leiden, 2001.
Малов С.Е. Язык желтых уйгуров: Словарь и грамматика. Алма-Ата, 1957.
Байыр-оол А.В., Кошкарева Н.Б., Мальцева А.А., Невская И.А., Озонова А.А., Панина Е.С., Селютина И.Я., Уртегешев Н.С., Федина Н.Н., Шагдурова О.Ю., Шамина Л.А., Широбокова Н.Н. Сложность языков сибирского ареала в диахронно-типологической перспективе. Новосибирск, 2018.
Dybo A., Maltseva V., Sheymovitch A., Sultrekova E. The use of personal markers in the Beltyr dialect of the Khakas language from a comparative perspective // Turkic Languages. 2019. № 2. P. 31-48.
 Distribution and Origin of Various Phonation Types in the Turkic Languages of South Siberia | Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Filologiya – Tomsk State University Journal of Philology. 2020. № 68. DOI: 10.17223/19986645/68/1

Distribution and Origin of Various Phonation Types in the Turkic Languages of South Siberia | Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Filologiya – Tomsk State University Journal of Philology. 2020. № 68. DOI: 10.17223/19986645/68/1

Download full-text version
Counter downloads: 1184