Research Proposal in English: Corpus-Based Genre Analysis | Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Filologiya – Tomsk State University Journal of Philology. 2020. № 68. DOI: 10.17223/19986645/68/4

Research Proposal in English: Corpus-Based Genre Analysis

The article attempts to apply the Create a Research Space (CARS) model as a tool of genre analysis to explore one of the least studied genres ‘research proposal’ in English in two academic fields (management and economics). The study focuses on the structure of introductions to research proposals written by bachelor students in English, which is their first foreign language. The study aims to respond to the following questions: 1. Is it possible to apply CARS methodology suggested to explore the genre of an empirical research article to the genre analysis of research proposals based on an introduction? 2. In what way are introductions to research proposals, written in English by Russian-speaking students in two neighboring sciences, economics and management, are similar and different? The rhetorical structure of an introduction as part of a research proposal in management and economics is a poorly studied area. The both disciplines under investigation are social sciences and therefore should have similar characteristics. The aim of this research is to compare and contrast data on the frequency of rhetorical moves within each discipline and between them to then compare and contrast the obtained results with the CARS concept. The CARS model was chosen as a research instrument as the tool, the most elaborated and reflected in scientific literature, to study EAP (English for academic purposes) texts. For research purposes, a corpus of research proposals’ introductions has been built. The CARS model was applied to work with the corpus within two stages: a) text analysis to reveal the main patterns of moves and steps and their differences and similarities across the two disciplines, b) linguistic signals’ analysis within the structure of each move (the use of tenses, verb forms, lexical items, etc.). All the texts within the corpus (20 texts in economics and 20 texts in management) were written by students of one university (National Research University Higher School of Economics) in accordance with the institutional requirements. The structure of the research proposals within the corpus was the basic one for the genre and the requirements of the institution and comprised the following sections: 1) background to the study, (2) rationale for the study, (3) objective of the study, (4) research questions, (5) theoretical framework, (6) methodology, (7) expected results, and (8) research implications. The results show that the moves and steps in students’ papers in the two disciplines vary in structure. There are significant similarities and differences between the disciplines. The study demonstrates that the CARS model is applicable to investigate various characteristic features of research papers in different academic fields including research proposals in economics and management. However, the model was found to have some limitations for genre analysis if a text has an unconventional moves’ structure, which might be typical for non-English speaking novice authors.

Download file
Counter downloads: 117

Keywords

research proposal, introduction, genre analysis, corpus-based text analysis, English rhetoric

Authors

NameOrganizationE-mail
Nuzha Irina V.Higher School of Economicsinuzha@hse.ru
Smirnova Natalya V.Higher School of Economicsnatas2002@yandex.ru
Shchemeliova Irina Y.Higher School of Economicsshhemirina@yandex.ru
Всего: 3

References

Смирнова Н.В. Обучение иноязычной письменной речи как социальной практике в условиях билингвального образования: (Социоэкономические специальности) (на материале английского языка) : автореф. дис.. канд. пед. наук. СПб., 2018.
Hyland K. Metadiscourse: Mapping interactions in academic writing // Nordic Journal of English Studies. 2010. Vol. 9, № 2. P.125-143.
Connor U. Variations in rhetorical moves in grant proposals of US humanists and scientists // Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse. 2000. Vol. 20, № 1. Р. 1-28.
Tardy С.М. A genre system view of the funding of academic research // Written Communication. 2003. Vol. 20, № 1. P. 7-36.
Habibie P., & Hyland K. (eds.). Novice writers and scholarly publishing: authors, mentors, gatekeepers. Palgrave Macmillan, 2019. 297 p.
Swales J. Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 1990. 260 p.
Бахтин М.М. Проблема речевых жанров // Собр. соч. М., 1996. Т. 5: Работы 19401960 гг. С. 159-206.
Седов К.Ф. Становление дискурсивного мышления языковой личности. Психо- и социолингвистические аспекты. Саратов, 1999. 180 c.
Сухомлинова М.А. Современный англоязычный академический дискурс: генезис и жанровая специфика. Ростов н/Д : Издательство Южного Федерального университета, 2018. 208 с.
Nesi H., Gardner S. Genres Across the Disciplines: Student Writing in Higher Education. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 2012. 293 p.
Cadman K. English for Academic Possibilities: the research proposal as a contested site in postgraduate genre pedagogy // Journal of English for Academic Purposes. 2002. Vol. 1, № 2. P. 85-104.
Cheng Y.H. Dissertation grant proposals as “writing games”: an exploratory study of two L2 graduate students' experiences // English for Specific Purposes.2014. Vol. 36. P. 7484.
Flowerdew J., & Wang S. H. Identity in academic discourse // Annual Review of Applied Linguistics. 2015.Vol. 35. P. 81-99.
Ding H. The use of cognitive and social apprenticeship to teach a disciplinary genre: initiation of graduate students into NIH grant writing // Written Communication. 2008. Vol. 1. P. 3-52.
Swales J. Aspects of Article Introductions. The University of Michigan Press ELT, Michigan Classics Editions, 2011. 104 p.
Samraj B. Introductions in research article: variations across disciplines // English for Specific Purposes. 2002. Vol. 21. P. 1-17.
Ozturk I. The textual organisation of research article introductions in applied linguistics: Variability within a single discipline // English for Specific Purposes. 2008. Vol. 26, № 1. P. 25-38.
Hyland K. Academic attribution: citation and the contraction of disciplinary knowledge // Applied Linguistics. 1999. Vol. 20, № 3. Р. 341-367.
Ламина К.В. Лексическое отрицание в испанском языке // Петербургская иберороманистика: Памяти профессора О.К. Васильевой-Шведе и академика Г.В. Степанова : сб. ст. / под ред. М.А. Марусенко. СПб., 2008. С. 95-105.
Crookes G. Towards a validated analysis of scientific text structure // Applied Linguistics. 1986. Vol. 7, № 1. P. 57-70.
Bondi M. 'A case in point'. Signals of narrative development in business and economics // KAcademic Discourse Across Discipline / eds. by Hyland, M. Bondi. Bern : Peter Lang, 2006. P. 49-75.
Antony L. Writing research article introductions in software engineering: How accurate is a standard model? // IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication. 1999. Vol. 42, № 1. Р. 38-46.
 Research Proposal in English: Corpus-Based Genre Analysis | Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Filologiya – Tomsk State University Journal of Philology. 2020. № 68. DOI: 10.17223/19986645/68/4

Research Proposal in English: Corpus-Based Genre Analysis | Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Filologiya – Tomsk State University Journal of Philology. 2020. № 68. DOI: 10.17223/19986645/68/4

Download full-text version
Counter downloads: 1184