The Rhetorical Structure Theory as the Instrument for Analyzing Poetic Texts | Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Filologiya – Tomsk State University Journal of Philology. 2020. № 68. DOI: 10.17223/19986645/68/6

The Rhetorical Structure Theory as the Instrument for Analyzing Poetic Texts

The article presents the results of applying the Rhetorical Structure Theory (RST) to poetic texts written in Russian. A poetic text is treated as a specific cognitive process. The work aims to reconstruct the structure of hypothetical cognitive steps that underlie the process of understanding a text and depend on implicit relational propositions that make the text coherent. The analyzed language material consists of the poetic texts written by Aleksey K. Tolstoy, the fragments from his prosaic texts, his letters, and his translations of poetic texts written by other authors. Three stages of investigation are discussed. The first and basic one is methodological; it consists in elaborating the principles of applying RST to poetic texts, particularly, in defining the rules of segmentation, in building the set of relations, and in developing the rules of identifying these relations in context. Seven types of relations were added to the ordinary set of relations presupposed by RST. Poetic texts rarely include reliable textual indicators of relations; therefore, these rules bring in focus semantic, pragmatic, and logical aspects of text understanding. The methodological stage was iterative and included several recalibrations; the summarizing principles are the result of adaptation the procedure to all sorts of the texts under consideration. The second stage of the investigation realizes these principles in the process of analyzing several types of texts by the means of RST. This stage results in a set of schemas. Finally, the third stage is devoted to a comparative analysis of the schemas corresponding to different groups of texts. The comparison goes along the following lines: 1) three periods of Tolstoy’s poetic writing: the early period 1840-1851, the middle period 1856-1859, and the late period1862-1875; 2) the lyrics written by Tolstoy against his translations of poetic texts written by other poets; 3) Tolstoy’s poetry against his prose and letters. After observing the percentage of relations in the corresponding sets of schemas, eight integral characteristics were formed. Each of them summarizes the relations that reach their maximum for one of the groups under consideration. For instance, each of the three periods of Tolstoy’s poetic writing received its own integral characteristic, and these data allow discussing specific trends in cognitive processes reflected by the corresponding texts. Along with the integral characteristics, several other peculiarities of the groups of texts were shaped.

Download file
Counter downloads: 104

Keywords

rhetorical relations, relational propositions, cognitive structure, poetic texts, text coherence, Aleksey K. Tolstoy

Authors

NameOrganizationE-mail
Timofeeva Mariya K.Federal Research Center for Informational and Computational Technologies; Sobolev Institute of Mathematics of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciencesmtimof@inbox.ru
Всего: 1

References

Mann W., Thompson S. Rhetorical Structure Theory: A Theory of Text Organization. Technical report No. ISI/RS-87-190. University of Southern California, Information Science Institute, 1987. 91 p. URL: https://www.sfu.ca/rst/pdfs/Mann_Thompson_1987.pdf (date of access: 10.08.2020).
O'Donnell M. RST-Tool: An RST Analysis Tool. // Proceedings of the 6th European Workshop on Natural Language Generation March 24-26, 1997 Gerhard-Mercator University. Duisburg, Germany, 1997. P. 92-96.
Рассказы о сновидениях: Корпусное исследование устного русского дискурса / под ред. А.А. Кибрика, В.И. Подлесской. М. : Языки славянских культур, 2009. 736 с.
Taboada M., Mann W. Rhetorical Structure Theory: Looking back and moving ahead // Discourse Studies. SAGE Publications, 2006. Vol. 8, № 3. P. 423-459.
Лотман Ю.М. Анализ поэтического текста: Структура стиха. Л. : Просвещение, 1972. 272 с.
Гаспаров М.Л. Метр и смысл. М. : Фортуна ЭЛ, 2012. 416 с.
Мартыненко Г.Я. Основы стилеметрии. Л. : Изд-во Ленингр. ун-та, 1988. 176 с.
Ruhlemann C., Aijmer R. Corpus Pragmatics: Laying the Foundations // Corpus pragmatics: a handbook Karin Aijmer / ed. by Christoph Ruhlemann. Cambridge University Press, 2014. 480 р.
Mann W., Thompson S. Relational Propositions in Discourse // Discourse Processes. Taylor and Francis Ltd. 1986. Vol. 9, № 1. P. 57-90.
Shannon C.E., Weaver W. The Mathematical Theory of Communication. The University of Illinois Press, 1949. 117 р.
Grice H.P. Logic and Conversation. In: Syntax and Semantics / eds. by Peter Cole, Jerry L. Morgan. New York : Academic Press, 1975. Vol. 3. P. 41-58.
Sperber D., Wilson D. Relevance: Communication and Cognition. Blackwell : Oxford and Harvard University Press, 1986. р. ѴШ + 279.
Познер Р. Рациональный дискурс и поэтическая коммуникация: методы лингвистического, литературного и философского анализа / науч. ред. И.П. Кужелева-Саган ; пер. с англ. С.С. Носовой. Томск : Издательский Дом Томского государственного университета ; Дизайн-студия «Провинция», 2015. 296 с.
Koj L. Zasada przezroczystosci a antynomie semantyczne // Studia Logica. 1963. 14. S. 227-253. (In Polish).
Taboada M., Mann W. Applications of Rhetorical Structure Theory // Discourse Studies. SAGE Publications, 2006. Vol. 8, № 4. P. 567-588.
Alexander M. Rhetorical Structure and Reader Manipulation in Agatha Christie's Murder on the Orient Express // Miscelanea: A Journal of English and American Philology. University of Zaragoza. 2009. Vol. 39. P. 13-27.
Lu Y. A Discourse Analysis of Zhuang Dialogue Folk Songs. A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts (linguistics) faculty of graduate studies. Mahidol University, 2016. 183 p.
Тимофеева М.К. Опыт использования теории риторической структуры для представления логико-когнитивной организации поэтического текста // Вестник НГУ. Серия: Лингвистика и межкультурная коммуникация. 2020. Т. 18, № 2. С. 28-45.
Chistova E., Kobozeva M., Pisarevskaya D., Shelmanov A., Smirnov I., Toldova S. Towards the Data-Driven System for Rhetorical Parsing of Russian Texts // Proceedings of Discourse Relation Parsing and Treebanking. DISRPT2019, Minneapolis, MN, June 6, 2019. P. 82-87.
Бакиева А.М., Батура Т.В. Исследование применимости теории риторических структур для автоматической обработки научно-технических текстов // Cloud of Science, 2017. Т. 4, № 3. С. 450-464.
Das D., Taboada M. Multiple Signals of Coherence Relations // Discours [Online], 24 | 2019, Online since 30 October 2019, connection on 30 October 2019. URL: http:// journals.openedition.org/discours/10032 (date of access: 10.08.2020).
Taboada M. Implicit and Explicit Coherence Relations. In J.Renkema (ed.). Discourse, of Course. An overview of research in discourse studies. Amsterdam : John Benjamins, 2009. P. 125-138.
Potter A. Reasoning between the Lines: A Logic of Relational Propositions. Dialogue and Discourse // US: The Dialogue & Discourse Board of Editors. 2019. Vol. 9, № 2. P. 80-110.
 The Rhetorical Structure Theory as the Instrument for Analyzing Poetic Texts | Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Filologiya – Tomsk State University Journal of Philology. 2020. № 68. DOI: 10.17223/19986645/68/6

The Rhetorical Structure Theory as the Instrument for Analyzing Poetic Texts | Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Filologiya – Tomsk State University Journal of Philology. 2020. № 68. DOI: 10.17223/19986645/68/6

Download full-text version
Counter downloads: 1184