Academic Reputation: A Corpus-Based Analysis of the Concept in Russian Social Practice in 2000-2011 | Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Filologiya – Tomsk State University Journal of Philology. 2021. № 70. DOI: 10.17223/19986645/70/4

Academic Reputation: A Corpus-Based Analysis of the Concept in Russian Social Practice in 2000-2011

The conception of this article is twofold: to consider the concept of academic reputation as an object of theoretical explanation and to analyze the use of the academic reputation concept in Russian social practices during the period of 2000-2011. Based on social constructionist explanations of discursive and social phenomena, the article discusses academic reputation in the framework of social practice. Reputation is considered as an attribute or resource that confers status and distinction. It is a special sort of social information about past actions and behaviour that constructs credibility and reliability of a person/institution. Past records signal future expectations. Academic reputation is currently defined in terms of evaluation of research quality and quantity measurable through journal impact scores, citation counts. Now it is a key component of university rankings and one of the drivers of institutional marketing in higher education. Against these assumptions, the article highlights crucial aspects of understanding the concept in Russia’s public space. What the present study adds to the existing debates on academic reputation is discussed in the following framework. Firstly, it is a new insight due to the choice of research object - reputation is examined and described as a linguistic representation of social practice in Russia. Secondly, the investigation used a new methodological approach and applied corpus-assisted discursive analysis that enables the demonstration of the academic reputation word-group functioning in Russian social discourse. Thirdly, there are new findings due to the use of corpus linguistics instruments - the analysis is based on the Russian Web 2011 (ruTenTen11) corpus, managed by the Sketch Engine system, which allows carrying out instrumental analysis in accord with the research aim. Following this trajectory, the main results and observations are introduced. The corpus findings lead to a conclusion that in 2000-2011, the concept academic reputation appears vague and unsteady, functioning in the Russian society on an intuitive perception level. In the most typical contextualisations, it moves away from its core features in the conceptional distinctions. This notion appears as a representative of social situations and practices external for Russia. The corpus-based findings fix the use of the academic reputation concept in the Russian context by 2011 in the higher and secondary education sphere. This concept is connected with competition and ratings. Academic reputation in Russian practice is mainly instrumentalized in the way it makes educational institutions emotionally attractive and shapes a positive public opinion for their promotion. Reference to academic reputation defines a competitive advantage that pushes up sales and works as an instrument of the social practice of consumerism. The presented analysis is merely the first step in exploring academic reputation in Russian discourse on the part of its society and academic community.

Download file
Counter downloads: 338

Keywords

academic reputation, corpus-based discourse analysis, Russian Web 2011 (ruTenTen11)

Authors

NameOrganizationE-mail
Kamshilova Olga N.Herzen State Pedagogical University of Russiaonkamshilova@gmail.com
Chernyavskaya Valeria E.Peter the Great Saint Petersburg Polytechnic Universitytcherniavskaia@rambler.ru
Всего: 2

References

Origgi G. A Social Epistemology of Reputation, Social Epistemology // A Journal of Knowledge, Culture and Policy. 2012. № 26:3-4. P. 399-418. DOI: 10.1080/02691728.2012.727193
Чернявская В.Е. Корпусно-ориентированный дискурсивный анализ идентичности российского университета 3,0 // Вестник Томского государственного университета. Филология. 2019. № 58. С. 97-114. DOI: 10.17223/19986645/58/7
Frank D., Gabler J. Reconstructing the University: Worldwide Changes in Academic Emphases Over the 20th Century. Stanford, CA : Stanford. University Press. 2006.
Oтчет работы экспертной группы НИУ ВШЭ. URL: http://2020strategy.ru/ g8/news/32639247.html (дата обращения: 20.05.2019).
Гаспарян Г.Р., Чернявская В.Е. Текст как дискурсивное событие // Вопросы когнитивной лингвистики. 2014. № 4 (41). C. 44-51.
Камшилова О.Н. LC-технологии в исследованиях освоения языка // Известия Российского государственного педагогического университета им. Герцена. 2014. № 168. C. 103-110.
Чернявская В.Е. Дискурсивный анализ и корпусные методы: необходимое доказательное звено?: Объяснительные возможности качественного и количественного подходов // Вопросы когнитивной лингвистики. 2018. № 2. C. 31-37. DOI: 10.20916/1812-3228-2018-2-31-37
Baker P., Gabrielatos C., Khosravinik M., Krzyzanowski M., McEnery T., Wodak R. A useful methodological synergy? Combining critical discourse analysis and corpus linguistics to examine discourse of refugees and asylum seekers in the UK press // Discourse and Society. 2008. № 19 (3). P. 273-306.
Baker P. Acceptable bias? Using corpus linguistics methods with critical discourse analysis // Critical Discourse Studies. 2012. № 9. Р. 247-256. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1080/17405904.2012.688297
Tognini-Bonelli E. Corpus Linguistics at work. Amsterdam et al. : Benjamins, 2001.
Galanes G., Leeds-Hurwitz W. (eds). Socially Constructing Communication. Cresskill, NJ : Hampton Press, 2009. 335 p.
Нефедов С.Т., Чернявская В.Е. Контекст в лингвистическом анализе: прагматическая и дискурсивно-аналитическая перспектива // Вестник Томского государственного университета. Филология. 2020. № 63. С. 83-97. DOI: 10.17223/19986645/63/5
Kilgarriff A., Baisa V., Busta J., Jakubwek M., Kovar V., Michelfeit J., Rychly P., Suchomel V. The Sketch Engine: ten years on // Lexicography. 2014. № 1 (1). Р. 7-36. DOI: 10.1007/s40607-014-0009-9
Kearns A., Kearns O., Lawson L. Notorious Places: Image, Reputation, Stigma //The Role of Newspapers in Area Reputations for Social Housing Estates, Housing Studies. 2013. DOI: 10.1080/02673037.2013.759546
Baumert J., Naumann J., Roeder P.M. Reputation - a hard-currency medium in interchange // Scientometrics. 1990. Vol. 19, № 5-6. P. 397-408.
Shapin S. “Never Pure”. Historical Studies of Science as if It was produced by people with bodies, situated in time, space, culture and society, and struggling for credibility and authority. The Johns Hopkins University Press, 2010.
Conard M.J., Conard M.A. Factors That Predict Academic Reputation Don't Always Predict Desire to Attend // Journal of Marketing for Higher Education. 2001. № 11 (4). Р. 118. DOI: 10.1300/J050v11n04-01
Drori G., Delmestri G., Oberg A. Branding the University: Relational Strategy of Identity Construction in a Competitive Field // Trust in Higher Education Institutions / eds by P. Scott, L. Engwall. London : Portland Press, 2013. P. 134-147.
Christensen T., Gornitzka E., Ramirez F.O. Reputation Management, Social Embeddedness and Rationalization of Universities // Universities as Agencies. Reputation and Professionalization, Palgrave Macmillan (eBook). 2019. P. 3-43. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92713-8.
Christensen T., Gornitzka Е. Reputation Management in Complex Environments -A Comparative Study of University Organizations // Higher Education Policy. 2016. № 30 (1). Р. 124-140. DOI: 10.1057/s41307-016-0010-z
Nefedov S.T. Towards Evaluation in Scientific Reviews (based on German Linguistics) // Journal of Siberian Federal University. Humanities & Social Sciences. 2019. № 3 (12). P. 1868-1886. DOI: 10.17516/1997-1370-0494
Rychly P., Kilgarriff A. An efficient algorithm for building a distributional thesaurus (and other Sketch Engine developments) // Proceedings of the ACL 2007 Demo and Poster Sessions. Prague, June 2007. P. 41-44.
Молодыченко Е.Н. Коммуникативно-прагматические особенности «лайфстайл-инструкции» как интернет-жанра в культуре потребления // Вестник Томского государственного университета. Филология. 2019. № 57. C. 79-102. DOI: 10.17223/ 19986645/57/5
 Academic Reputation: A Corpus-Based Analysis of the Concept in Russian Social Practice in 2000-2011 | Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Filologiya – Tomsk State University Journal of Philology. 2021. № 70. DOI: 10.17223/19986645/70/4

Academic Reputation: A Corpus-Based Analysis of the Concept in Russian Social Practice in 2000-2011 | Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Filologiya – Tomsk State University Journal of Philology. 2021. № 70. DOI: 10.17223/19986645/70/4

Download full-text version
Counter downloads: 1792