Genres of Popular Fiction and the Mechanics of Cognitive Recognition
In the article, the author researches sociocultural and cognitive aspects of literary genres. From sociocultural perspective, genres function as social ‘pacts’ that enable communication between actors of literature as a social institute (writers, readers, critics, publishers, and distributors). From cognitive perspective, genres are viewed as cognitive frames that exist in readers’ consciousness, influence readers’ responses during the acts of reception, and orient readers in the imaginary world of a text. In contemporary scientific and public discussions of genres, two levels are usually confused: the level of social positioning and the level of reception. Literary critics and scholars tend to use the rhetoric technique of defining through negation-they prove the ‘exclusivity’ of a text, its high aesthetic quality, and high position in cultural hierarchy by excluding it from any categories. However, on the level of reception there are no non-categorized texts-any text is a member of a group or a category. In the act of reception, readers correlate a text with a generic ‘prototype’ according to the principle of ‘family resemblance’. In the article, the author argues that sociocultural and cognitive levels should be viewed as separate, but not isolated from each other-they are dialectically interconnected. The article focuses on genres of popular fiction. Their functioning is inseparable from the market: they formed as industrial ‘niches’ on literary markets in Russia, Europe, and the USA in the late 19th - early 20th centuries. At that time, those niches received their ‘generic names’ that were associated with the lists of literary texts, social stereotypes, and notions of their social and cultural meanings. Readers’ acquaintance with a genre is a dynamic process-it includes reading of literary texts associated with the genre in the field of literary production, adoption of repetitive ideas of the genre, and development of cognitive skills of reading generic texts, i.e. orientation in the textual space and decoding it. In readers’ consciousness, genres function as cognitive frames of reception-they coordinate readers’ interpretative efforts and aesthetic evaluation of a text. The author shares the results of empirical observations based on an experiment: the participants were offered to read the first paragraphs of F. Kafka’s Metamorphosis from the lens of different genres (detective fiction, science fiction, and horror). This experiment demonstrated how different generic stereotypes activate models and habits of reception relevant for different situations.
Keywords
genre studies,
cognitive genre studies,
family resemblance,
prototype,
genres of popular fiction,
detective fiction,
science fiction,
horrorAuthors
Zubov Artem A. | Lomonosov Moscow State University; Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration | artem_zubov@mail.ru |
Всего: 1
References
Sinding M. Beyond essence (or getting over ‘there’): Cognitive and dialectic theories of genre // Semiotica. 2004. № 149-1/4. P. 377-395.
Fishelov D. Genre Theory and Family Resemblance - Revisited // Poetics. 1991. № 20. P. 123-138.
Лакофф Дж. Женщины, огонь и опасные вещи: Что категории языка говорят нам о мышлении [1987]. М. : Языки славянской культуры, 2004. 792 с.
Hanenberg P., Brandt P.A. Strange Loops and a Cognitive Approach to Genre // Cognitive Semiotics. 2010. № 6. P. 179-192.
Williamson R. Pesher: A Cognitive Model of the Genre // Dead Sea Discoveries. 2010. Vol. 17, № 3. P. 307-331.
Тарасова И.А. Жанр в когнитивной перспективе // Жанры речи. 2018. № 2 (18). С. 88-95.
Gelder K. Popular Fiction: The Logics and Practices of a Literary Field. L. ; N.Y. : Routledge, 2004. 179 p.
Glover D. Publishing, history, genre // The Cambridge Companion to Popular Fiction / ed. by David Glover, Scott McCracken. L. ; N.Y. : Cambridge University Press, 2012. P. 15-32.
White H. Anomalies of Genre: The Utility of Theory and History for the Study of Literary Genres // New Literary History. 2003. Vol. 34, № 3. P. 597-615.
Зенкин С.Н. Теория литературы: проблемы и результаты. М. : НЛО, 2018. 368 с.
Гройс Б. О новом: Опыт экономики культуры [1992]. М. : Ад Маргинем Пресс, 2015. 240 с.
Зверев А.М. Что такое «массовая литература»? // Лики массовой литературы США. М. : Наука, 1991. С. 3-36.
Adams T. Ian McEwan: ‘Who’s going to write the algorithm for the little white lie?’ [interview] // The Guardian. 2019. April 14. URL: https://www.theguardian.com/books/2019/apr/14/ian-mcewan-interview-machines-like-me-artificial-intelligence (дата обращения: 16.03.2020).
Giles J. Love, Sex and Robots Collide in a New Ian McEwan Novel // The New York Times. 2019. May 1. URL: https://www.nytimes.com/2019/05/01/books/review/ian-mcewan-machines-like-me.html (дата обращения: 16.03.2020).
Theroux M. Machines Like Me by Ian McEwan review-intelligent mischief // The Guardian. 2019. April 11. URL: https://www.theguardian.com/books/2019/apr/11/machines-like-me-by-ian-mcewan-review (дата обращения: 16.03.2020).
Ditum S. ‘It drives writers mad’: why are authors still sniffy about sci-fi? // The Guardian. 2019. April 18. URL: https://www.theguardian.com/books/2019/apr/18/it-drives-writers-mad-why-are-authors-still-sniffy-about-sci-fi (дата обращения: 16.03.2020).
Miller L. Ian McEwan Should Read Some Science Fiction // Slate. 2019. April 29. URL: https://slate.com/culture/2019/04/ian-mcewan-science-fiction-machines-like-me.html (дата обращения: 16.03.2020).
Stockwell P. Texture: A Cognitive Aesthetics of Reading. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2012. viii, 216 p.
Юзефович Г. Что случилось с литературным жанром // Юзефович Г. О чем говорят бестселлеры. Как все устроено в книжном мире. М., 2018. С. 150-160.
Wolfe G.K. Evaporating Genres: Essays on Fantastic Literature. Middletown, Conn. : Wesleyan University Press, 2011. xv, 260 p.
Соколов М.М., Соколова Н.А., Сафонова М.А. Статусные культуры, биографические циклы и поколенческие изменения в литературных вкусах читателей петербургских библиотек // Журнал социологии и социальной антропологии. 2016. Т. 19, № 3 (86). С. 116-135.
Duff D. Romanticism and the Uses of Genre. Oxford ; N.Y. : Oxford University Press, 2009. x, 256 p.
Шеффер Ж.-М. Что такое литературный жанр? [1989] М. : Едиториал УРСС, 2010. 192 с.
Зубов А.А. «Роман с научной подкладкой»: научная фантастика и конструирование социального воображения в России начала XX века // Вестник Московского университета. Серия 9. Филология. 2018. № 1. С. 116-127.
Тэрбер Дж. Тайна убийства Макбета: рассказы. СПб. : Азбука-классика, 2006. 349 с.
Кафка Ф. Собрание сочинений : в 3 т. Т. 1. М. : ТЕРРА-Книжный клуб, 2009. 560 с.