Integrating metapragmatics into genre analysis: Does the analytical toolkit need an upgrade in the digital era? | Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Filologiya – Tomsk State University Journal of Philology. 2022. № 75. DOI: 10.17223/19986645/75/4

Integrating metapragmatics into genre analysis: Does the analytical toolkit need an upgrade in the digital era?

The aim of this article is to (further) theoretically and analytically integrate metapragmatics into genre analysis. Metapragmatics broadly refers to any reflexive activity, reflexive awareness, and reflexive knowledge on the part of social actors as to how the language is/should be used, as well as to the study of such reflexive phenomena. One way such phenomena are manifested and become “visible” is through so-called metapragmatic discourse - discourses or discourse fragments referencing the pragmatics of other discourses or, in effect, of their own fragments. It is contended that at least part of what such discourses consistently do is reflect on various generic properties of discourses they have as objects of their metasemiosis. Thus, from a more practical standpoint, the aim was to explore several instances of metapragmatic discourse vis-a-vis possible generic references used by the actors and to reveal what such usage can contribute to our understanding of genres and how they “work” in contextualized communicative events. With this end in mind, seven YouTube videos and their accompanying comments sections have been analyzed. The results indicate that a certain percentage of the exchanges the members of the community engage in is indeed related to the generic properties of the original discourse. This can vary from simply using a generic label to (metapragmatically) refer to the discourse in question (as a token of a certain type/genre) to actually discussing the generic characteristics of the genre it instantiates. Interestingly, many references to genres are evaluative, projecting a certain attitudinal stance of the actor(s). Another observation is that different wordings used by the discourse community to refer to generic models can be, as it were, “proper” generic labels, but they can also be words and phrases that would hardly qualify as proper names of genres from the standpoint of a genre analyst. This emphasizes the idea that to a “lay” actor using (proper) generic labels is but one way of regimenting discourses metapragmatically and that the borderline between these and “improper” ways of typifying discourse is not well defined. A third observation is that metapragmatic acts (whereby metapragmatic/generic labels are used) are also metasemiotic: actors routinely evoke elements of other semiotic modalities as indexing a certain genre (or a genre-like metapragmatic model discussed above). In a broader perspective, this research emphasizes yet again the social nature of genres and the increasing demand to explore contextualized discourses, with the “embeddedness” of the (original) discourse in comments produced by the discourse community being one of the possible angles on such contextualization. The author declares no conflicts of interests.

Download file
Counter downloads: 46

Keywords

metapragmatics, digital genres, online media, discourse community, discourse analysis, lifestyle discourse

Authors

NameOrganizationE-mail
Molodychenko Evgeni N.National Research University Higher School of Economicsemolodychenko@hse.ru
Всего: 1

References

Briggs C.L., Bauman R. Genre, intertextuality, and social power // Journal of Linguistic Anthropology. 1992. Vol. 2, № 2. P. 131-172.
Gunthner S., Knoblauch H. Culturally patterned speaking practices - the analysis of communicative genres // PragmaticsPragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA). 1995. Vol. 5, № 1. P. 1-32.
Hanks W.F. Discourse genres in a theory of practice // American Ethnologist. 1987. Vol. 14, № 4. P. 668-692.
Miller C. Genre as social action // Quarterly Journal of Speech. 1984. Vol. 70, № 2. P. 151-167.
Miller C. Genre as social action (1984), revisited 30 years later (2014) // Letras & Letras. 2015. December. P. 56-72.
Miller C., Shepherd D. Questions for genre theory from the blogosphere // Genres in the internet: Issues in the theory of genre. 2009. P. 263-290.
Бахтин М.М. Проблема речевых жанров // Литературно-критические статьи. М., 1986. С. 428-472.
Дементьев В.В. Речежанровые заимствования // Структуры и функции: исследования по русистике. 2016. Т. 2, № 2. С. 53.
Салимовский В.А. Жанры речи в функционально-стилистическом освещении (русский научный академический текст) : дис.. д-ра филол. наук. Екатеринбург, 2002.
Agha A. Language and social relations // Studies in the social and cultural foundations of language. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 2007.
Blommaert J. Discourse: A critical introduction. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 2005.
Blommaert J. Meaning as a nonlinear effect: The birth of cool // AILA Review. 2015. Vol. 28. P. 7-27.
Chouliaraki L., Fairclough N. Discourse in late modernity: Rethinking critical discourse analysis. Edinburgh : Edinburgh University Press, 1999.
Hodge R., Kress G. Social semiotics. Ithaca ; New York : Cornell University Press, 1988.
Luders M., Proitz L., Rasmussen T. Emerging personal media genres // New Media & Society. 2010. Vol. 12, № 6. P. 947-963.
Scollon R., Scollon S.W. Nexus analysis: Discourse and the emerging internet. London ; New York : Routledge, 2004. 198 p.
Swales J.M. Research genres: Explorations and applications. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 2004.
Giltrow J., Stein D. Genres in the Internet. Innovation, evolution, and genre theory // Genres in the internet: Issues in the theory of genre / ed. by J. Giltrow, D. Stein. John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2009. P. 1-26.
Xia S.A. Genre Analysis in the Digital Era: Developments and Challenges. 2020. Vol. 8. P. 141-159.
Askehave I., Nielsen A.E. Digital genres: A challenge to traditional genre theory // Information technology and people / ed. by E.N. Anne, B.H. Kwasnik, K. Crowston. 2005. Vol. 18, № 2. P. 120-141.
Schulz W. Reconstructing mediatization as an analytical concept // European Journal of Communication. 2004. Vol. 19, № 1. P. 87-101.
Hiippala T. An overview of research within the Genre and Multimodality framework // Discourse, Context and Media. 2017. Vol. 20.
Silverstein M. Metapragmatic discourse and metapragmatic function // Reflexive language: Reported speech and metapragmatics / ed. by J. A. Lucy. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 1993. P. 33-58.
Spitzmuller J. Graphic variation and graphic ideologies: A metapragmatic approach // Social Semiotics. 2015. Vol. 25, № 2. P. 126-141.
Горошко Е.И., Полякова Т.Л. Инстаграм как жанр 2.0 (на примере политической коммуникации) // Жанры речи. 2019. № 4 (24). C. 300-313.
Дементьев В.В. Онлайн-тесты в новостном браузере: лингвистические и речежанровые характеристики // Жанры речи. 2020. № 1 (25). C. 62-78.
Крылов Ю.В., Стексова Т.И. Новые жанры интернет-коммуникации (на примере демотиватора и мема) // Жанры речи. 2020. № 1 (25). C. 53-61.
Щипицина Л.Ю. Веб-лекция как устный жанр интернет-коммуникации // Жанры речи. 2019. № 3 (23). C. 215-226.
Щурина Ю.В. Речевые жанры русскоязычного сегмента социальной сети Instagram // Жанры речи. 2020. № 2 (26). C. 155-165.
Silverstein M. Shifters, linguistic categories, and cultural description // Meaning in anthropology / ed. by K.H. Basso, H.A. Selby. Albuquerque : University of New Mexico Press, 1976. P. 11-55.
Silverstein M. The Three Faces of “Function”: Preliminaries to a Psychology of Language // Social and functional approaches to language and thought / ed. by Maya Hickmann. Orlando : Academic Press, 1987. P. 17-38.
Halliday M.A.K., Matthiessen C.M.I.M. Construing experience through meaning: A language-based approach to cognition. London ; New York : Continuum, 1999.
Halliday M.A.K., Matthiessen C.M.I.M. An introduction to functional grammar. London : Hodder Education, 2004.
Fairclough N. Analysing discourse: Textual analysis for social research. London ; New York : Routledge, 2003.
Silverstein M. The indeterminacy of contextualization: When is enough enough? // The contextualization of language / eds. by Peter Auer, Aldo Di Luzio. John Benjamins Publishing Company, 1992. P. 55-76.
Eckert P. Variation and the indexical field // Journal of Sociolinguistics. 2008. Vol. 12, № 4. P. 453-476.
Levinson S. C. Pragmatics. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 1983.
Brown R., Gilman A. The Pronouns of Power and Solidarity // Style in Language / ed. by T.A. Sebeok. Cambridge, Mass. : MIT Press, 1960. P. 253-276.
Silverstein M. Language structure and linguistic ideology // The elements: A parasession on linguistic units and levels / ed. by P.R. Clyne, W.F. Hanks, C.L. Hofbauer. Chicago : Chicago Linguistic Society, 1979. P. 193-247.
Agha A. Voice, footing, enregisterment // Journal of Linguistic Anthropology. 2005. Vol. 15, № 1. P. 38-59.
Verschueren J. Notes on the role of metapragmatic awareness in language use // Pragmatics. 2000. Vol. 10, № 4. P. 439-456.
Coupland N. Style: Language variation and identity. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 2007. 209 p.
Чернявская В.Е. Метапрагматика коммуникации: когда автор приносит свое значение, а адресат свой контекст // Вестник Санкт-Петербургского университета. Язык и литература. 2020. № 1 (17). C. 135-147.
Jenkins R. Social identity. London ; New York : Routledge, 2004. 218 p.
Tajfel H. Social identity and intergroup behaviour // Social Science Information/sur les sciences sociales. 1974. Vol. 13, № 2. P. 65-93.
Кара-Мурза Е.С. Лингвистическая экспертиза информационного обеспечения выборов (на материале президентской кампании 2018 г.) // Медиалингвистика. 2019. Т. 6, № 2. С. 148-163.
Verschueren J. Understanding pragmatics // Understanding pragmatics. London : Edward Arnold, 1999.
Ventola E. Problems of modelling and applied issues within the framework of genre // WORD. 1989. Vol. 40, № 1-2. P. 129-161.
Кожина М.Н. Речевой акт и речевой жанр (некоторые аспекты проблемы) // Жанры речи. Саратов, 1999. С. 52-61.
Devitt A.J. Generalizing about Genre: New Conceptions of an Old Concept // College Composition and Communication. National Council of Teachers of English, 1993. Vol. 44, № 4. P. 573-586.
Devitt A.J. Re-fusing form in genre study // Genres in the internet: Issues in the theory of genre / ed. by J. Giltrow, D. Stein. Amsterdam ; Philadelphia : John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2009. P. 27-48.
Devitt A.J. Genre performances: John Swales’ Genre Analysis and rhetorical-linguistic genre studies // Journal of English for Academic Purposes. 2015. Vol. 19. P. 44-51.
Askehave I., Swales J.M. Genre identification and communicative purpose: A problem and a possible solution // Applied Linguistics. 2001. Vol. 22, № 2. P. 195-212.
Bhatia V.K. Analysing genre: Language use in professional settings. London ; New York : Longman, 1993.
Swales J.M. Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. 3rd ed. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 1990.
Bhatia V.K. Critical genre analysis: Theoretical preliminaries // HERMES - Journal of Language and Communication in Business. 2015. Vol. 27, № 54. P. 9-20.
Moreno A.I., Swales J.M. Strengthening move analysis methodology towards bridging the function-form gap // English for Specific Purposes. 2018. Vol. 50. P. 40-63.
Swales J.M. Genre and engagement // Revue belge de philologie et d’histoire. 1993. Vol. 71, № 3. P. 687-698.
Blommaert J., Smits L., Yacoubi N. Context and its complications // Tilburg Papers in Culture Studies. Vol. 208. Tiburg : Tilburg University, 2018. URL: https://www.resear-chgate.net/publication/325347012_Context_and_its_complications (accessed: 09.07.2020).
Martin P. Genre and discourse community // ES: Revista de filologm inglesa. 2003. Vol. 25, № 25. P. 153-166.
Skalicky S. Was this analysis helpful? A genre analysis of the Amazon.com discourse community and its “most helpful” product reviews // Discourse, Context & Media. 2013. Vol. 2, № 2. P. 84-93.
Szabla M., Blommaert J. Does context really collapse in social media interaction? // Applied Linguistics Review. 2018. Vol. 9, № 2.
Hyland K. Persuasion, interaction and the construction of knowledge: Representing self and others in research writing // International Journal of English Studies. 2008. Vol. 8, № 2. P. 1-23.
Maswana S., Kanamaru T., Tajino A. Move analysis of research articles across five engineering fields: What they share and what they do not // Ampersand. 2015. Vol. 2. P. 1-11.
Swales J.M., Rogers P. Discourse and the projection of corporate culture: The mission statement // Discourse & Society. 1995. Vol. 6, № 2. P. 223-242.
Boyd M.S. (New) participatory framework on YouTube? Commenter interaction in US political speeches // Journal of Pragmatics. 2014. Vol. 72. P. 46-58.
Lehti L. et al. Linguistic analysis of online conflicts: A case study of flaming in Smokahontas comment thread in YouTube // WiderScreen. 2016. № 1-2. URL: http://widerscreen.fi/numerot/2016-1-2/linguistic-anaead-on-youtube (accessed: 09.07.2020).
Talbot M.M. Media discourse: Representation and interaction. Edinburgh : Edinburgh University Press, 2007.
Andersen T.H., van Leeuwen T.J. Genre crash: The case of online shopping // Discourse, Context & Media. 2017. Vol. 20. P. 191-203.
Ordinary lifestyles: Popular media, consumption and taste / ed. by D. Bell, J. Hollows. Maidenhead : Open University Press, 2005.
Historicizing lifestyle: Mediating taste, consumption and identity from the 1900s to 1970s / ed. by D. Bell, J. Hollows. London ; New York : Routledge, 2006.
Machin D., van Leeuwen T. Language style and lifestyle: The case of a global magazine // Media, Culture & Society. 2005. Vol. 27, № 4. P. 577-600.
Machin D., van Leeuwen T. Global media discourse: A critical introduction. London : Routledge, 2007.
Raisborough J. Lifestyle media and the formation of the self. Houndmills : Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2011.
Martin J.R. The Discourse Semantics of Attitudinal Relations: Continuing the Study of Lexis // RJL. 2017. Vol. 21, № 1. P. 22-47.
Martin J.R., White P.R. R. The language of evaluation. London : Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2005.
White P.R.R. Exploring the axiological workings of ‘reporter voice’ news stories - Attribution and attitudinal positioning // Discourse, Context & Media. 2012. Vol. 1, № 2. P. 57-67.
White P.R.R. Taking Bakhtin Seriously: Dialogic effects in written, mass communicative discourse, Japanese Journal of Pragmatics, V.12 // Japanese Journal of Pragmatics. 2010. Vol. 12. P. 37-53.
Wood M.K. What makes a vlog a vlog? // Diggit Magazine. 2019. URL: https://www.diggitmagazine.com/academic-papers/what-makes-vlog-vlog (accessed: 05.07.2020).
Лущиков В.А., ТерскихМ.В. Жанрово-тематические и языковые особенности видеоблогов // Вестник Тамбовского университета. Серия: Общественные науки. 2018. Т. 4, № 14. С. 57-75.
Текутьева И.А. Жанрово-тематическая классификация видеоблогинга // Медиасреда. 2016. № 11. С. 107-113.
Bhatia V.K. Generic patterns in promotional discourse // Persuasion across genres: A linguistic approach / ed. by H. Halmari, T. Virtanen. Amsterdam ; Philadelphia : John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2005. P. 213-225.
Cook G. The discourse of advertising. 2nd ed. London ; New York : Routledge, 2001.
Дементьев В.В. Заголовки с цифрами в интернет-медиа: лингвистические и прагматические характеристики // Вестник Томского государственного университета. Филология. 2020. № 63. С. 5-27.
Serrano M.J., Ау'ут O.M.A. Discourse objectivization, social variation and style of Spanish second-person singular tu. 2014. Vol. 48. P. 225.
Bauman R., Briggs C.L. Poetics and performance as critical perspectives on language and social life // Annual Review of Anthropology. 1990. Vol. 19. P. 59-88.
Bateman J.A. Triangulating transmediality: A multimodal semiotic framework relating media, modes and genres // Discourse, Context & Media. 2017. Vol. 20. P. 160-174.
Купрещенко О.Ф. Учебный лонгрид как мультимодальный текст: к вопросу о специфике жанра // Общество. Коммуникация. Образование. 2020. Т. 11, № 2. С. 69-77.
 Integrating metapragmatics into genre analysis: Does the analytical toolkit need an upgrade in the digital era? | Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Filologiya – Tomsk State University Journal of Philology. 2022. № 75. DOI: 10.17223/19986645/75/4

Integrating metapragmatics into genre analysis: Does the analytical toolkit need an upgrade in the digital era? | Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Filologiya – Tomsk State University Journal of Philology. 2022. № 75. DOI: 10.17223/19986645/75/4

Download full-text version
Counter downloads: 196