SKIN SENSITIVE OF POTENTIAL DONOR AREAS USED IN MAMMOPLASTIC RECONSTRUCTION | Issues of reconstructive and plastic surgery. 2014. № 3 (50).

SKIN SENSITIVE OF POTENTIAL DONOR AREAS USED IN MAMMOPLASTIC RECONSTRUCTION

The paper presents the results of a study of skin sensitivity potential donor areas (the back, the anterior abdominal wall, buttocks, inner thighs), which are used in modern reconstructive mammoplasty. Using the threshold test monofilament, test temperature sensitivity, tests for the study of pain and tactile sensitivity, twopoint discrimination test Weber, in 50 healthy women aged 20-59, were conducted studies of skin sensitivity intact breast and skin potential donor areas used for reconstructive mammoplasty. It has been proven that their parameters of skin sensitivity skin hypogastrium the anterior abdominal wall are most close to the corresponding parameters of the skin intact breast.

Download file

Counter downloads: 471

Keywords

reconstructive mammoplasty, donor area, afferent innervation, words: restoration of sensitivity, реконструктивная маммопластика, афферентная иннервация, донорские зоны, восстановление чувствительности

Authors

Name	Organization	E-mail
Fedorov Ye. V.
Silkina K. A.		silkinakristina@gmail.com

Всего: 2

References

Bickley, Lynn S. Bates’ Guide to Physical Examination and History Taking (9th ed.). Lippincott Williams &Wilkins, 2007, pp. 123-129.

Shulgovsky V. V. Fundamentals of neurophysiology. Moscow, Aspect Press Publ., 2000. 277 p. (in Russian).

Moberg. E. Objective methods for determining the functional value of sensibility in the hand // J Bone Jt Surg,1958, vol. 40B, pp. 454-476.

Weber E. H. Ueber den Tastsinn // Arch Anat Physiol, 1835, S. 152-159.

Gelberman R.H., Szabo R.M., Williamson R.V., Dimick M.P. Sensibility testing in peripheral nerve compressionsyndromes // J Bone Jt Surg, 1983, vol. 65A, pp. 632-638.

BellKrotoskiJ., Tomancik T. The repeatability of testing with SemmesWeinsteinmonofilaments // J HandSurg, 1987, vol. 12A, pp. 155-161.

Berger K., Bostwick J. III., Jones G. A woman’s decision: surgical options for autologous breast reconstruction.Qual. Med. Publ. Inc., St. Louis, Misouri, 2012.

Jaume Masia. TBAR:Total Breast Anatomy Restoration / Jaume Masia // Current Challenges in Total BreastReconstruction II. Сollection exhibition of Participants of the International forum “Barcelona Breast Meeting”(Barcelona, 13-15 March, 2013), Barcelona, 2013.

Bickley, Lynn S. Bates’ Guide to Physical Examination and History Taking (9th ed.) // Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. - 2007. - P. 123-129.

Moberg. E. Objective methods for determining the functional value of sensibility in the hand // J. Bone Jt. Surg. - 1958 - V. 40B. - P. 454-476.

Weber E. H. Ueber den Tastsinn // Arch. Anat. Physiol. - 1835. - S. 152-159.

Шульговский В. В. Основы нейрофизиологии. - М.: Аспект Пресс - 2000. - 277 с.

Gelberman R.H., Szabo R.M., Williamson R.V., Dimick M.P. Sensibility testing in peripheral nerve compression syndromes // J. Bone Jt. Surg. -1983. - V. 65A. - P. 632-638.

BellKrotoski J., Tomancik T. The repeatability of testing with SemmesWeinstein monofilaments // J. Hand Surg. -1987. - V. 12A. - P. 155-161.

Berger K., Bostwick J. III., Jones G. A woman’s decision: surgical options for autologous breast reconstruction. Qual. Med. Publ. Inc., St. Louis, Misouri, 2012.

Jaume Masia. TBAR: Total Breast Anatomy Restoration / Jaume Masia // Current Challenges in Total Breast Reconstruction II: сб. выст. Участников Международного форума «Barcelona Breast Meeting» (Барселона, 13-15 марта 2013 г.) - Барселона, 2013.