ANALYSIS OF USING OF VARIOUS DONOR ZONES IN SURGICAL TREATMENT OF PATIENTS WITH MUSCULOSKELETAL TUMORS OF DIFFERENT ORIGIN | Issues of reconstructive and plastic surgery. 2019. № 4 (71). DOI: 10.17223/1814147/71/02

ANALYSIS OF USING OF VARIOUS DONOR ZONES IN SURGICAL TREATMENT OF PATIENTS WITH MUSCULOSKELETAL TUMORS OF DIFFERENT ORIGIN

The experience of using of various donor zones in surgical treatment of bone tumors is presented in the original study. A solid data of the treatment of 500 patients with tumors who were underwent surgical resection of bone and further bone plasty is presented. The process of bone restoration in the early and late postoperative period located in the graft harvesting zone, the “donor site morbidity” are documented. From the results obtained, conclusions are drawn on the optimal selection of the donor zone and its use.

Download file
Counter downloads: 54

Keywords

опухоль, аутотрансплантат, болезни донорской зоны, tumor, autograft, donor site morbidity

Authors

NameOrganizationE-mail
Kotelnikov G.P.Samara State Medical University
Ivanov V.V.Samara State Medical University; Samara Regional Oncologic Clinical Hospitalviktor_travm@bk.ru
Ivanova O.F.Samara State Medical Universitydoc_olga@bk.ru
Nikolaenko A.N.Samara State Medical Universitynikolaenko.83@inbox.ru
Doroganov S.O.Samara State Medical Universitysvdor95@gmail.com
Platonov P.V.Samara State Medical Universitypavelp163@gmail.com
Всего: 6

References

Котельников Г.П., Миронов С.П., Мирошниченко В.Ф. Травматология и ортопедия: учебник. М.: ГЭОТАР-Медиа, 2009:400 с.
Lesensky J., Nemec K., Kofranek I., Matejovsky Z. Autologous structural iliac bone grafts in reconstructions of short bone defects in the hand and foot after primary bone tumor resections: a single-institution retrospective study. European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology, 2017;27(6):797-804. https://doi.org /10.1007/s00590-017-1990-0
Давыдов М.И., Чиссов В.И. Национальное руководство по онкологии. М.: ГЭОТАР-Медиа, 2012:863-866
Нейштадт Э.Л., Маркочев А.Б. Опухоли и опухолеподобные заболевания костей. Практическое руководство. СПб.: Фолиант, 2007:233-237
Ryu J.J., Kim W., Lee J.S., Kim Y.K., Lee H.S., Seo S.G. Combined Autograft and Bone Cement for Painful Chondroblastoma: A Case Report. The Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery, 2017;57(2):396-400. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jfas.2017.08.019 № 4 (71) декабрь’ 2019 Вопросы реконструктивной и пластической хирургии Пластическая хирургия / Plastic surgery 15
Косулин А.В., Елякин Д.В. Болезни донорской зоны как проблема хирургической вертебрологии: систематический обзор. Научно-практический журнал «Хирургия позвоночника», 2016;13(2):45-51
Lenze U., Kasal S., Hefti F., Krieg A. H. Non-vascularised fibula grafts for reconstruction of segmental and hemicortical bone defects following meta-/diaphyseal tumour resection at the extremities. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 2017;18:289. https://doi.org /10.1186/s12891-017-1640-z
Shin S.R., Tornetta P. Donor Site Morbidity After Anterior Iliac Bone Graft Harvesting. Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma, 2016;30(6):340-343. https://doi.org /10.1097/BOT.0000000000000551
Alireza Ghassemi et al. Comparison of Donor-Site Engraftment After Harvesting Vascularied and Nonvascularized Iliac Bone Grafts. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 2009 Aug;67(8):1589-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2009.04.013
Котельников Г.П., Терсков А.Ю., Иванов В.В. Устройство для забора костной ткани: патент РФ на полезную модель № 125835 от 20.03.2013
Иванов В.В., Николаенко А.Н., Платонов П.В., Дороганов С.О. Устройство для забора трансплантата из подвздошной кости: патент РФ на полезную модель № 180686 от 21.06.2018
 ANALYSIS OF USING OF VARIOUS DONOR ZONES IN SURGICAL TREATMENT OF PATIENTS WITH MUSCULOSKELETAL TUMORS OF DIFFERENT ORIGIN | Issues of reconstructive and plastic surgery. 2019. № 4 (71). DOI: 10.17223/1814147/71/02

ANALYSIS OF USING OF VARIOUS DONOR ZONES IN SURGICAL TREATMENT OF PATIENTS WITH MUSCULOSKELETAL TUMORS OF DIFFERENT ORIGIN | Issues of reconstructive and plastic surgery. 2019. № 4 (71). DOI: 10.17223/1814147/71/02

Download full-text version
Counter downloads: 722