NEW MINIMALLY INVASIVE TECHNIQUE OF TREATING PATIENTS WITH CARPAL TUNNEL SYNDROME | Issues of reconstructive and plastic surgery. 2020. № 3 (74). DOI: 10.17223/1814147/74/05

NEW MINIMALLY INVASIVE TECHNIQUE OF TREATING PATIENTS WITH CARPAL TUNNEL SYNDROME

Objective. Carpal Tunnel Syndrome (CTS) is a compression-ischemic neuropathy of the median nerve at the level of the wrist. Between 3.7 to 5.0% of the human population suffers from this condition. This makes it the most widely spread tunnel syndrome of the upper limb. This illness leads to sudden deterioration of the upper limb function, work-decrement and significant decrease in the quality of life. Both conservative and surgical treatments can be used in order to treat CTS. Surgical treatment includes classical release through the longitudinal access as well as multiple minimally invasive procedures. There exist multiple miniinvasive techniques. However, they are not widespread amongst professionals because of difficulties in performing these procedures and the high prices of the expendable materials. The goal of this research was to improve the results and to shorten the terms of treatment of patients with carpal tunnel syndrome by creating and introducing a new, cheap and easily reproducible minimally invasive procedure. Material and methods. The research consisted of two parts - anatomical and clinical. In the anatomical part of the research (12 upper extremities of 6 unfixed corpses) safe accesses to the carpal tunnel were proposed and the anatomic peculiarities of this area for procedure applied to the minimally invasive decompression of the nerve were studied. In the clinical part of the work the results of the treatment of 46 people aged 28 to 89 with the II stage of the CTS by Szabo's scale were analysed. All patients received minimally invasive ligamentotomy of the transverse ligament of the wrist in the outpatient setting under local anaesthesia. A new technique, the “carpal hook” was used (56 surgeries). Average length of the operation was from 5 to 15 minutes. The wounds averagely healed within 7 days after the surgery. No stitches were used. Results. The observation period lasted for 6 to 18 months. Before the surgical treatment functioning of the hand of all patients was assessed by the Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire and by VAS and qDASH scales in order to evaluate the results of the treatment in dynamics. The assessment of scar tissues was conducted by Vancouver Scar Scale suggested by T. Sullivan 6 months after the operation. All patients got good and excellent clinical and esthetical results after treatment. Conclusion. Received data illustrates the high efficiency of the usage of minimally invasive ligamentotomy of the palmar ligament of the wrist with the help of a new tool. One of the major merits of this technique is the minimal damage to the superficial tissues. This allows for a reduction of the rehabilitation period and it improves the quality of the scar tissue. Another positive factor of the operation is the lower cost of treatment, the duration of the operation is shorter and the absence of hospitalization. There is no need for expensive equipment in order to use "carpal hook". The only equipment which is needed is an ultrasonic apparatus. Minimally invasive ligamentotomy of the palmar ligament of the wrist with the help of a new tool can be used in the practice of the hand surgeons and neurosurgeons that have the experience with the conduction of open operations and the basic skills of ultrasonic diagnostics.

Download file
Counter downloads: 165

Keywords

neuropathy, tunnel syndrome, «carpal hook», Carpal Tunnel Syndrome, median nerve, decompression

Authors

NameOrganizationE-mail
Zhigalo A.V.International Medical Center “SOGAZ”handcenter@mail.ru
Pochtenko V.V.International Medical Center “SOGAZ”
Morozov V.V.International Medical Center “SOGAZ”
Berezin P.A.Northern State Medical University
Ermolaeva M.M.St. Petersburg Institute of Emergency Care named after I.I. Dzhanelidze
Всего: 5

References

Keith M.W., Masear V, Chung K. et al. Diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2009;17(6):389-396.
Atroshi I., Gummesson C., Johnsson R. et al. Prevalence of carpal tunnel syndrome in a general population. JAMA. 1999;282(2):153-158.
Papanicolaou G.D., McCabe S.J., Firrell J. The prevalence and characteristics of nerve compression symptoms in the general population. J Hand Surg. Am. 2001;26(3):460-466.
Bongers F.J., Schellevis F.G., van den Bosch W.J., van der Zee J. Carpal tunnel syndrome in general practice (1981 and 2001): incidence and role of occupational and non-occupational factors. Br J Gen Pract. 2007;57(534):36-39.
Zhang S., Vora M., Harris A.H.S, Baker L., Curtin C, Kamal R.N. Cost-Minimization Analysis of Open and Endoscopic Carpal Tunnel Release. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 2016;98-A(23):1970-1977.
Fajardo M., Kim S.H., Szabo R.M. Incidence of carpal tunnel release trends and implications within the United States ambulatory care setting. J Hand Surg Am. 2012;37(8):1599-1605.
Daniell W.E., Fulton-Kehoe D., Franklin G.M. Work-related carpal tunnel syndrome in Washington State workers’ compensation: utilization of surgery and the duration of lost work. Am J Ind Med. 2009;52(12):931-942.
Mackinnon S.E., Novak C.B. Compression Neuropathies. In: Green’s Operative hand surgery. 6th ed. N.Y., Churchill Livingstone. 2010:1423-1478.
Davidge K.M., Sammer D.M. Median nerve entrapment and injury. In: Nerve Surgery. N.Y., Thieme. 2015:207- 250.
Kim D.H., Hudson A.R., Kline D.G. Atlas of peripheral nerve surgery. 2th ed. Elsevier. 2013:139-153.
Atroshi I., Larsson G., Ornstein E. et al. Outcomes of endoscopic surgery compared with open surgery for carpal tunnel syndrome among employed patients: randomized controlled trial. BMJ. 2006;332(7556):1473-1480.
Байтингер А.В. Эндоскопическая декомпрессия срединного нерва при первичном синдроме карпального канала: автореф. дис. … канд. мед. наук. Красноярск, 2019;23 с.
Boeckstyns M.E., Sшrensen A.I. Does endoscopic carpal tunnel release have a higher rate of complications than open carpal tunnel release? An analysis of published series. J Hand Surg Br. 1999;24(1):9-15.
Chow J.C.Y., Hantes M.E. Endoscopic carpal tunnel release: thirteen years’ experience with the Chow tech- nique. J Hand Surg. 2002;27(6):1011-1018.
Pajardi G., Pegoli L., Pivato G. et al. Endoscopic carpal tunnel release: our experience with 12,702 cases. Hand Surg. 2008;13(1):21-26.
Benson L.S., Bare A.A, Nagle D.J. et al. Complications of endoscopic and open carpal tunnel release. Arthro- scopy. 2006;22(9):919-924.
Cellocco P., Rossi S., Bizzarri F. et al. Mini-open blind procedure versus limited open technique for carpal tunnel release: a 30-month follow-up study. J Hand Surg Am. 2005;30(3):493-499.
Jugovac I., Burgic N., Micovic V. et al. Carpal tunnel release by limited palmar incision vs traditional open technique: randomized controlled trial. Croat Med J. 2002;43(1):33-36.
Nakamichi K., Tachibana S., Yamamoto S., Ida M. Percutaneous carpal tunnel release compared with mini-open release using ultrasonographic guidance for both techniques. J Hand Surg Am. 2010;35(3):437-445.
Nakamichi K., Tachibana S. Ultrasonographically assisted carpal tunnel release. J Hand Surg Am. 1997;22(5):853-862.
Bhattacharya R., Birdsall P.D., Finn P., Stothard J. A randomized controlled trial of knifelight and open carpal tunnel release. J Hand Surg Br. 2004;29(2):113-115.
Helm R.H., Vaziri S. Evaluation of carpal tunnel release using the knifelight instrument. J Hand Surg Br. 2003;28(3):251-254.
Hamed A.R, Makki D., Chari R., Packer G. Double-versus single-incision technique for open carpal tunnel release. Orthopedics. 2009;32(10):318-323.
Rojo-Manaute J.M., Capa-Grasa A., Rodrнguez-Maruri G.E. et al. Ultra minimally invasive sonographically guided carpal tunnel release: anatomic study of a new technique. J Ultrasound Med. 2013;32(1):131-142.
Szabo R.M., Madison M. Carpal tunnel syndrome. Orthop Clin North Am. 1992; 23(1):103-109.
Fowler J.R., Gaughan J.P., Ilyas A.M. The sensitivity and specificity of ultrasound for the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome: a meta-analysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011; 469(4):1089-1094.
Sullivan T., Smith J., Kermode J. et al. Rating the burn scar. J Burn Care Rehabil. 1990; 11(3):256-260.
Meems M., Truijens S., Spek V. et al. Prevalence, course and determinants of carpal tunnel syndrome symptoms during pregnancy: a prospective study. BJOG. 2015;122(8):1112-1118.
 NEW MINIMALLY INVASIVE TECHNIQUE OF TREATING PATIENTS WITH CARPAL TUNNEL SYNDROME | Issues of reconstructive and plastic surgery. 2020. № 3 (74). DOI: 10.17223/1814147/74/05

NEW MINIMALLY INVASIVE TECHNIQUE OF TREATING PATIENTS WITH CARPAL TUNNEL SYNDROME | Issues of reconstructive and plastic surgery. 2020. № 3 (74). DOI: 10.17223/1814147/74/05

Download full-text version
Counter downloads: 802