Modern psychology: difficult parting with methodological illusions | Sibirskiy Psikhologicheskiy Zhurnal – Siberian Journal of Psychology. 2004. № 20.

Modern psychology: difficult parting with methodological illusions

The problem of «paradigmal shift» as one of the most important characteristics of modem scientific psychology is studied in the article. Objectivation of the main point in this shift requires realization of methodological aims which are rejected by science and those which replace them. It is affirmed that supposed transformation goes in the most fundamental, basic, world outlook layer which ensures professional unity of the people working with psychology. It is the very reason of the psychological strain in scientific community which is able to realize illusiveness of some starting methodological premises, but this community has not had time to assume new methodological conditions as paradigmal (generally accepted) aims.

Download file
Counter downloads: 157

Keywords

paradigmal shift, methodological illusions, objective tendencies in science development, levels of theoretical thinking, методологические иллюзии, парадигмальный сдвиг, уровни теоретического мышления, объективные тенденции развития науки

Authors

NameOrganizationE-mail
Klochko Vitaly E.Tomsk State University
Всего: 1

References

Хомская Е.Д. О методологических проблемах современной психологии // Вопросы психологии. 1997. № 3. С. 112-125.
Зинченко В.П. Исторический или психологический кризис? // Вопросы психологии. 2004. № 3.
Агафонов А.Ю. Человек как смысловая модель мира. М.: Бахрах. 2000. 334 с.
Сурмава А.В. Психологический смысл исторического кризиса (опыт исторического психоанализа) // Вопросы психологии. 2004. № 3.
Гегель Г. Сочинения. Т. 3. М. 1956.
 Modern psychology: difficult parting with methodological illusions | Sibirskiy Psikhologicheskiy Zhurnal – Siberian Journal of Psychology. 2004. № 20.

Modern psychology: difficult parting with methodological illusions | Sibirskiy Psikhologicheskiy Zhurnal – Siberian Journal of Psychology. 2004. № 20.