Correlation of propensity to pedagogical improvisation and subjective and professional experience of pre-service teachers | Sibirskiy Psikhologicheskiy Zhurnal – Siberian Journal of Psychology. 2016. № 61.

Correlation of propensity to pedagogical improvisation and subjective and professional experience of pre-service teachers

The aim of the present study was to test how the level of a pre-service teacher's professional experience auto-evaluation of self-rated student's professional field experience and his subjective pedagogical experience are related to the propensity to pedagogical improvisation and his efficiency in solving different pedagogical tasks. The theoretical background of the study is a hypothesis of pedagogical improvisation understood as a teacher's creative activity. In the quality of creative activity pedagogical improvisation should correlate to subjective experience, because it is the experience of our own autonomous and initiative activity, directed on some field (in this case, teaching). Our previous studies show that pre-service teachers are able to demonstrate quite a high level of propensity to pedagogical improvisation, but their level of professional experience is low. This fact provokes a question, whether propensity to pedagogical improvisation is correlated to subjective experience and professional efficiency. Method. We have conducted two series of empirical research. Both in the first and in the second series we used the scale "Auto-evaluation of pedagogical thinking" (Savin, 2012) for estimating the propensity to pedagogical improvisation and the level of professional experience development. In the first series (N = 74) the indicator characterizing the emotional relation to field practice - the degree of its saturation by positive emotions - was used to estimate the subjective experience of teaching. In the second series (N = 48) we used the author's scale that allows estimating the degree of person's perception of himself as the agent of pedagogical activity (he estimates himself as activity's initiator, estimates his own activity as autonomous and as leading to changes in himself and his pupils). Also in second series we used the technique of solving pedagogical tasks and estimated productivity and confidence in it. Results. Positive correlations (Spearman's coefficient) of subjective and professional experience were found both in the first (rs = 0,27, p = 0,012), and in the second series (rs = 0,38, p = 0,009). Propensity to pedagogical improvisation doesn't correlate with professional experience in both series, correlates negatively with subjective experience in first series (rs = -0,29, p = 0,008), and doesn't correlate with subjective experience in the second series. These results indicate that there are two forms of pedagogical improvisation among pre-service teachers: the improvisation that is not based on experience (subjective or professional) and the improvisation based on experience. Only the second form is creative, because it associates with the experience of one's own autonomous and initiative activity in teaching. At the same time, there is no difference between two forms of improvisation by reference to efficiency and confidence in solving pedagogical tasks.

Download file
Counter downloads: 291

Keywords

педагогическая импровизация, профессиональный опыт, субъектный опыт, студент-педагог, pedagogical improvisation, professional experience, subjective experience, pre-service teacher

Authors

NameOrganizationE-mail
Savin Evgeny Yu.Tsiolkovsky Kaluga State Universitysey71@yandex.ru
Всего: 1

References

Харькин В.Н. Педагогическая импровизация: теория и методика. М. : NB Магистр, 1992. 159 с.
Маркова А.К., Никонова А.Я. Психологические особенности индивидуального стиля деятельности учителя // Вопросы психологии. 1987. № 5. С. 40-48.
Borko H., Livingston C. Cognition and Improvisation: Differences in Mathematics Instruc tion by Expert and Novice Teachers // American Educational Research Journal. 1989. Vol. 26, № 4. P. 473-498.
Кан-Калик В.А., Никандров Н.Д. Педагогическое творчество. М. : Педагогика, 1990. 144 с.
Загвязинский В.И. Педагогическое творчество учителя. М. : Педагогика, 1987. 159 с.
Sawyer R.K. Creative teaching: collaborative discussion as disciplined improvisation // Educational Researcher. 2004. V. 33, № 2. P. 12-20.
Савин Е.Ю. Опыт и личностные характеристики как факторы педагогической импровизации у студентов-педагогов // Сибирский психологический журнал. 2011. № 42. С. 93-101.
Sawyer R.K. What Makes Good Teachers Great? The Artful Balance of Structure and Im provisation // Structure and Improvisation in Creative Teaching / ed. by R.K. Sawyer. Cambridge ; N.Y. : Cambridge University Press, 2011. P. 1-24.
Лактионов А.Н. Координаты индивидуального опыта. Харьков : Б.и., 2010. 368 с.
Знаков В.В. Экзистенциальный опыт субъекта как проблема психологии человеческого бытия // Субъектный подход в психологии / под ред. А. Л. Журавлева, В.В. Знакова, З.И. Рябикиной, Е.А. Сергиенко. М. : Институт психологии РАН, 2009. С. 211-225.
Сапогова Е.Е. Жизненный и экзистенциальный опыт в автобиографических нарративах личности // Вопросы психологии. 2014. № 1. С. 68-79.
Кибальченко И.А. Психологические основы организации учебно-познавательного опыта обучающихся / под ред. А.В. Непомнящего. М. : Кредо, 2010. 414 с.
Якиманская И.С. Личностно-ориентированное обучение в современной школе. М. : Сентябрь, 1996. 96 с.
Холодная М.А. Психология интеллекта. Парадоксы исследования. 2-е изд. СПб. : Питер, 2002. 272 с.
Кибальченко И.А. Взаимосвязь субъектного, ментального и познавательного опыта у лиц с разной успешностью деятельности // Психологический журнал. 2010. Т. 31, № 3. С. 33-45.
Савин Е.Ю. Понятийный и метакогнитивный опыт как основа интеллектуальной компетентности в научной деятельности // Психологический журнал. 2004. Т. 25, № 5. С. 50-59.
Холодная М.А., Берестнева О.Г., Кострикина И.С. Когнитивные и метакогнитивные предпосылки интеллектуальной компетентности в научно-технической деятельности // Психологический журнал. 2005. Т. 26, № 1. С. 29-37.
Савин Е.Ю. Опыт разработки семантического дифференциала для измерения эмоционального отношения студента к педагогической практике // Научные труды Калужского государственного университета им. К.Э. Циолковского. Серия: Психолого-педагогические науки. Калуга : КГУ им. К.Э. Циолковского, 2013. С. 237-241.
Савин Е.Ю. Методика изучения склонности к педагогической импровизации и самооценки опытности: конструирование и апробация // Психологическая наука и образование. 2012. № 1. С. 190-200. URL: http://www.psyedu.ru.
Абульханова К.А. Принцип субъекта в отечественной психологии // Психология. Журнал Высшей школы экономики. 2005. Т. 2, № 4. С. 3-21.
Брушлинский А.В. Проблемы психологии субъекта. М. : Институт психологии РАН, 1994.
Осницкий А.К. Проблемы исследования субъектной активности // Вопросы психологии. 1996. № 1. С. 5-19.
Сергиенко Е.А. Системно-субъектный подход: обоснование и перспектива // Психологический журнал. 2011. Т. 32, № 1. С. 120-132.
Немов Р.С. Психология : в 3 кн. М.: Просвещение: Владос, 1995. Кн. 3. 507 с.
 Correlation of propensity to pedagogical improvisation and subjective and professional experience of pre-service teachers | Sibirskiy Psikhologicheskiy Zhurnal – Siberian Journal of Psychology. 2016. № 61.

Correlation of propensity to pedagogical improvisation and subjective and professional experience of pre-service teachers | Sibirskiy Psikhologicheskiy Zhurnal – Siberian Journal of Psychology. 2016. № 61.

Download full-text version
Counter downloads: 1355